MovieChat Forums > Stratego > Replies
Stratego's Replies
Wow, the first two deleted comments were made 47 years ago! I didn't know IMDb was that old!
Courtney Cox became rather anorexic in later seasons.
Man, didn't we have enough threads like this back on IMDb?
Good to hear!
He sounds like an asshole. Don't printers (and clicking computer mice and tapping keyboards for that matter) also make a lot of noise? If he wanted quiet, he should've gone to a different part of the library.
Where the hell did I say you should let negativity change your excitement? Are YOU joking? All I'm saying is that you might end up not liking the movie at all, so you're getting upset over nothing.
Well, you just got to learn how to deal with that. I'm not going to be positive just for your sake. You know how many people talk negatively about the things I like? And you don't even know yet if you're going to like this movie!
"I may not be Hollywood, but I know more about the film's production than you can possibly fathom."
And on what do you base that assumption about me? Appearances???
Your supposed knowledge about the film's production has nothing to do with my right to express my negative opinion about this movie.
Great if you have faith in them, I don't. They already went wrong with the casting of Emma Watson.
Good god, are you Hollywood or something? People can make up their own mind. It isn't fair either if positive opinions like that of lisafordeay encourages people to see this movie.
How the hell do I ruin it for others by giving my honest opinion?
So every time we "see" a movie, we can only judge it based on its appearance? It's not like I can spend some time with it and learn all about its interests and hobbies...
Who says that all I saw was "appearances"?
Then why are you so upset? I think it has more to do with the director admitting the movie has a gay agenda than there being a gay character. And since when do Frozen and Finding Dory have gay characters???
From what I've seen, this movie looks like crap. And I dislike Emma Watson very much, she's a bad actress with a bad attitude.
Come on, post on the Sliders board!
Well, that must mean all the men in the village are gay...
What? I actually thought they made a backdoor pilot about Earnest!
I think he could've been on the show as a recurring character, like one of those friends of Jessica solving murders together with her.
Like many others, I think they're too dark and depressing, too modernized with too many changes and I actually think the newer episodes look pretty cheap, like just putting a filter over it automatically gives it a good look. The earlier episodes may look a bit grainy for today's standards, but they're much more atmospheric with a great Art Deco look, even in the details. That clean, slick look is what I dislike about a lot of today's shows. I also prefer Hastings and Miss Lemon as side characters. And I'm not sure if it's the acting, writing, editing or perhaps all three, but I also think the newer episodes are boring.
Models Inc., a ridiculous prime time soap that lasted only one season.
I can't name any serious shows, because I honestly feel that most, if not all, shows went on long enough or even too long. I don't need to see new episodes.
1. I saw reruns of the earliers seasons as a teen in the mid/late 90s. I love murder mysteries and also the period the show's set in. I just love the Art Deco style.
2. MOTOE is enjoyable up to a point, but I dislike Finney's portrayal of Poirot. I enjoyed Ustinov's DOTN better, but every subsequent movie became worse. The 90s episodes of Suchet's Poirot are much better, but I don't like the later seasons at all. I think that even the worst of those theatrical movies are better. Suchet is the ultimate Poirot, though.
3. I've read the novels from The Mysterious Affair at Styles all the way through to Five Little Pigs.
Where did they say that? On the movie's commentary? I've never seen anyone mention it on IMDb.