MovieChat Forums > Underdog_73 > Replies
Underdog_73's Replies
I can only hope you're joking.
I'm still waiting to hear how it hasn't aged well. All you've shown here is it's SOCIETY that hasn't aged well.
Truth be told, there are the same amount of psychos that are offended by everything. The problem is the internet. It's given them a voice, and the moronic powers that be, listen to that unstable voice of the minority. One freak complains about something moronic and everyone takes action.
So yeah....it's society that hasn't aged well.
Seriously, just type out the word "would". How lazy can a person be??? How much time are you saving by typing 2 less characters? Not enough to warrant the nonsensical impression.
Simple....the zombie virus augments the strength of the jaw muscles 10 fold. Problem solved!
There are actual real problems that I'm still reeling about. Such as the magical possibility of germ warfare using walker innards. It's not possible based on the history of the show. Period. This is one of the worst copouts these idiot writers have ever moronically attempted.
I'm not certain, but it looked like a Ballistic case.
I have to admit, I agree with everything you said, and the Episode III reference is more than fitting.
So, I accuse you of seeking attention via your duplicate thread creations, and you accuse me of being an attention whore? Can you think for yourself? All you did was say the same thing back to me, just much more childishly? Wow. The rubber/glue defense. Grade school memories. Are you an adult? These replies are simply sad. So very, very sad. You sound like an 8 year old, but I'm betting you're more like a 60 year old intellectually and emotionally stunted loser.
Your maturity and intellect is astounding. Why bother replying when you continue to make yourself look the fool?
See what I mean, attention seeker? You had to reply to me twice. And nice mouth??? What does that even mean? Are you actually too dumb to know the meaning of that phrase? It's used in response to vulgar language you brainless twit. None of which occurred. Please, can you embarrass yourself further? Your "bite me" reply is a good start.....
So I guess that proves it. I was right. You're not getting the motherly attention you crave. And maybe you should learn what a troll actually is, before you continue to idiotically throw the term around incorrectly. You're the troll, fool. You create the same thread over and over for attention. Once is fine. Multiple times makes you a moron, a troll, and an attention seeker. All in all you have the mentality and intellect of a toddler. Your tantrum supports that.
Are you not getting enough attention from your mommy? You have to seek it out on internet forums? One thread like this is pathetic enough, but to start a second one, just to get reactions from people, goes way beyond sad. You already sought attention this way 10 months ago...
[url]https://moviechat.org/tt0098904/Seinfeld/590f57f4d3f1ed0011d5d001/Why-do-people-think-this-show-is-funny[/url]
I was already watching on a delay, and FFing through the commercials and still couldn't take it.
It didn't help that I was already soured by that pathetically overhyped "deleted" scene from the mid season finale. They advertised that like it was the Holy Grail of lost footage, and it was a complete and utter waste of time.
It's the CW, sexual orientation means nothing. Sooner or later every character turns gay, or if already gay, then bisexual. They've escalated their agenda into utter idiocy.
Ok. For argument's sake, let's say that's true. What does it say about a President, that would give someone like her, a job, in the White House, because he felt sorry for her? We're not talking about car dealership or a restaurant. We're talking about the White House.
So what does that make the "genius" who gave her a job, not only within the US government, but in the White House?
The lion tamer getting eaten would have made it a much better movie. It's amazing bullying animals was considered entertainment.
Erm, there was no joke or sarcasm there. Maybe you should look up the meaning of both.
And let me just say wow....let me say it again....wow....You weren't content with making a complete idiot out of yourself in the conversation that actually included you? You had to seriously go out of your way and follow me to another topic, just to reply to something I said to someone else. Does someone need to be the center of attention? That goes way beyond pathetic. Now you've proven you're a creepy loser. I won't be wasting anymore time on you. I'm actually embarrassed for you. The best thing you could do for yourself is to immediately shut up. Don't make it worse. Go find a friend. Good luck.
Ha! You're too funny....
You're clearly not a problem solver, nor can you think outside the box.
There most certainly is a solution. Yet you can't seem to grasp it. It's funny how the clueless always want to accuse someone else of that very same thing. Ironic. Maybe they (you) feel if they (you) accuse someone else of being as dumb as they are, it makes them less so? Sorry, the rubber/glue argument doesn't even work for children. Unlike you though, they're actually smart enough to know that.
And what exactly is a good excuse? Go back, read what you wrote. Maybe then you'll comprehend your utter lack of intellect? When writing, you actually have to write. We don't want to assume what's in that big empty head of yours.
The saddest part of all this? You're not even grasping this argument. The messy posts you provide have nothing to do with comprehension. I can understand a slurring drunk....that doesn't mean I want to converse with such a fool....
I've come to now expect horrible writing on the show, so I would have been fine with them saying Agnes was in danger, and either have Tom move away with her, to a secret location, or still kill Tom, and have Red find Agnes a home with a family no one knows about. With Liz's permission, for Agnes' safety. Sort of like witness protection. This way she'd be written off the show.