There are without the smallest doubt scenes of cp in this movie. Thos scenes are already described everywhere an even are avail on social platforms. So if someone is defending that cp trash by standing "Its okay to avoid cp by forcing children into cp scenes" is simply, again without any doubt, a pedo pervert.
So its abvious that all lefties are pedo pervies!
There is no child pornography in this film and watching it or defending it doesn’t make someone a pedo.
shareThis topic is over. Its proven. There are scenes of cp in this movie.
shareYou are incorrect. You are imagining things. Perhaps you have a problem with seeing child porn everywhere. Do you think Huggies commercials are child porn? Do you think a baby in the bath is child porn? Are kids underwear commercials pornographic to you?
shareAgain: Thos scenes are published and its proven. So stop excusing for being a pedo. Instead start some therapy!
shareI've seen the film. There is no child porn in it. Now, answer my questions please. According to your definition of child porn are any of the following child porn:
-diaper commercials
-babies in the bath
-kids in underwear
Except that clips are now on pornhub for pedos to masturbate with.
You are trash.
I haven't seen this movie in it's entirety yet but I've seen the twerking scene on youtube. And I wouldn't call it porn but it is quite provocative.
Although the reaction we're seeing from it does remind me of all the negative publicity that movie Hounddog (2007) got. And it too turned out to be much less erogenous than the naysayers were all claiming. Besides this, I seriously doubt pedos are watching films like this anyways.
If they really wanted to be titillated by movies they would watch that Italian film called Little Lips (1978). Now 'that' is a shocking film, beautiful but yeah, very shocking. And the more recent American film called The Tale (2018) is even more controversial than Little Lips. But they do use a body double for the sex scenes in this one, thank god.... ugggg.....