MovieChat Forums > Midsommar (2019) Discussion > People Still Don't Realize Midsommar Is ...

People Still Don't Realize Midsommar Is About White Supremacy!


https://collider.com/midsommar-ari-aster-white-supremacy/

In the years since Midsommar, much has been written about the movie’s portrait of grief and community. Ari Aster’s second feature is also rightfully celebrated as one of the best horror movies ever, and it’s impossible to watch it and remain indifferent to the nightmarish wonders Aster conjured on the silver screen. However, while Midsommar is a layered work of art that invites multiple readings, many people still fail to see the most obvious one. That’s because, at its core, Midsommar is a cautionary tale about the ability of white supremacist groups to increase their ranks with promises of support and comfort.

reply

I thought it was about the danger of cults and how they take advantage of people with mental illness to get new recruits.

reply

It is. ‘Satan’ is just trying to deceive you with some woke-ass Collider article.

reply

I got that first paragraph from Imdb News, but just read the full article now. I doubt Aster agrees with this woke Latino's interpretation of his movie. Collider should classify it as "Opinion".

It is true that pagan tribes are often "racially" pure, but that's just a result of not mixing with foreigners. Also northern people are white unless they get too much sun.

reply

From the article:

"In Aster’s words, the Hårga were designed as racists and represent “a part of Swedish history and European history.” And when they look outside their conservative community for “new blood” they can recruit or use for breeding purposes, they are exclusively searching for white people."

What kind of quote is this? They're quoting him, but insert their own preface. lmao.

The movie isn't about specifically racism. It's about cults. Whether that be religions, gangs, terrorist org's what have you. That's what it is about. Cult mentality reaches into all of these things and creates a ton of problems as you can learn from watching any documentary on the subject.

People NEED to stop making everything about race. It's okay to have discussions about race, but the way the internet handles it is your cult right there.

reply

IMHO it's a mistake to categorize the Vikings and their religion as "racist", considering the number of white people they murdered, enslaved, and raped.

reply

Yeah, but they had more fun when they were doing it to black folks.

Screw you, Erik the Red, ya damn racist!

reply

The movie makes perfect sense now! A lonely woman who lost her family gains a new one from white supremacists who use the sense of belonging to a close-knit community in order to recruit new members. That's how it's done in real life, too!

"Aster, a filmmaker coming from a Jewish family, chose to use Nordic elements to represent this all-white community. It’s not news that Nationalist movements in Europe looked back at an idealized version of Viking culture to justify their racist ideals.

White supremacy groups have not been gaining strength in the last decade by spitting out threats. Their most powerful weapon is a sense of community. In a world ravaged by an everlasting economic crisis and the irreparable destruction of nature, it’s only natural people feel lost and helpless. And while minorities have been banding together to celebrate their culture and fight for equal rights, the average white person doesn’t have the same kind of community to turn to. That’s how white supremacists attract people, with empathy and an open heart. Just like the Hårga.

Pelle wants to show Dani she doesn’t have to be alone, as the Hårga can become a family to her, too.

And the fact people still didn’t realize Midsommar is about white supremacy shows how successfully Aster showed the world even the most despicable communities can still recruit new members if they distract you with empathy."

Scary stuff! I've heard former white supremacists explain how they were recruited by a "friendly group" because they felt isolated and alone. Similar story with other domestic terrorist groups and street gangs.

reply

Yes. It was almost on the nose, really. The community is all white. They have a planned policy of breeding and even inbreeding. The choice this time falls on a white male called Christian. The non-whites are all eliminated: the couple from London and Josh. Mark, who I think is gay, is also disposed of.

reply

Admittedly, it's curious that the first couple to be eliminated were minorities, so, on that basis, perhaps you were onto something, but Mark wasn't gay. He was an ultra-priapic straight guy who wanted to get laid. He was seduced by one of the female cult members and taken away from the rest of the group by said young woman, and ended up being killed as a result of this temptation.

reply

I agree that Mark wasn't supposed to be gay, IMHO he was supposed to be a sexist douche straight man, the kind of guy who tells his bro to put his woman in her place.

reply

He was pesky, definitely a substandard brreeding candidate

reply

Pesky isn't hereditary, but ugly is.

reply

Midsommar isn"t Hereditary, but it's still pretty good. See what I did here?

reply

Is it possible that he was a latent homosexual who was ultimately rejected and killed because he couldn't get it up for a woman?

That's not really the impression I got. He genuinely seemed to be a 'pussy-hound' to use the type of parlance once might expect from a man like Mark, but I'm trying to reconcile this thread's thesis and the idea that 'inferior breeders' were knocked off, with Mark's early exit/fate.

Suggesting he was 'ugly' is a bit cruel, and the actor, Will Poulter has been cast as the de facto 'hunk' in other shows/films (make of that what you will), but I suppose that *would* account for 'inferior genes'.

reply

Agreed, which is why I'm partly sceptical as to the OP's 'white supremacist' contention.

I'm not saying that the Scandinavian cult was a 'good thing' (it was certainly sinister), but ultimately I took the message of the movie to be about Dani's liberation as a woman, with the implication that careless Christian, dudebro Mark and even uptight Josh were jerks who needed to be punished for their various trangressions/sins.

It's intriguing that Dani didn't defeat the cult but was instead ultimately seduced and subsumed by it, but as with most 'monster' movies/horrors, it's usually the jerks who are the first to be punished, and the Final Girl tends to be spared on account of her superior virtue.

reply

To have "White Supremacy" you need non-Whites for the Whites to lord over. An all White Community utterly disinterested in brown people is the opposite of White Supremacy.

reply

Hmm, I thought it was about the dangers of easily influenced, needy little bitches who are desperate for attention.

reply

I enjoyed this film, but is it was supposed to be an analogy for white supremacy, it failed.

The film almost seems to be celebrating the fates of Dani's companions. Their deaths are so lurid and almost comical, and they are presented as such flawed, petty, feckless characters, that whilst their fates are undoubtedly disturbing, there's a sense of 'karma' to them, as if we're meant to believe they've been righteously punished.

I doubt Ari Aster would want us to feel that way if his intent was to present the cult as white supremacists, UNLESS he is a white supremacist himself. 🤷‍♂️

Once again, this seems like another example of the type of shallow, superficial criticism one sadly now expects in today's post-Trump society (i.e. 'people do bad things therefore they must be the villains', in other words, judging a film's characters, solely on the basis of their actions, rather than picking up on nuances, character details, and the way a film's mood and tone directs us to feel a certain way about various characters).

reply

The film is a celebration of European Identity and tradition. A certain type of people would obviously call that "white supremacy" as the OP does, but that is their own personal flaw and not a flaw of the film.

reply

Okay! I don't think it's a film about white supremacy, even though the characters are undoubtedly racist, and I also don't think it's a story about cults specifically.

I think it's a story about the highest level of psychological torture, the kind that completely breaks the victim, to the point that the victim becomes completely dependent on the torturer because their selfhood has been destroyed. And that's what the final choice was about, they singled one person out for this kind of psychological abuse and the rest for death, they first seduced her with inclusion and joy, but at the end they destroyed her by making her choose who would die. That made her feel complicit in their crimes, and the resulting flood of guild and self-recrimination finished the job of destroying her self-image, destroyed the person she had been and left nothing behind. I think a person can resist abuse as long as they believe they're in the right, that they're the good person, but once that was gone... there was absolutely nothing left at that final moment but the catharsis of the sacrifice. She was theirs from then on.

reply

Interesting. 👍🏼

I like your thesis, and psychologically, it's spot-on (i.e. it comes down to cognitive dissonance and gaslighting, and thus trapping someone, in either an abusive relationship, or in this case a cult, by making them complicit in their crimes), but emotionally, it's not the sense I got from the film. The ending of the film seemed to imply that Dani gained some sort of strength and power, rather than grief, guilt or even emptiness, from being absorbed into the cult (although that arguably elaborates on the idea of cognitive dissonance, and the rationalisation of bad behaviour; at the film's end, Dani is fully onboard with the cult, and has been gaslit to believe it's a force of good). It was a sinister and intentionally transgressive, rather than an editorialising/po-faced, ending that almost treated Dani's elevation within the cult as an act of triumph, at least from her own perspective.

reply