Was the ending supposed to be shocking?
I generally avoid even attempting to guess how a film is going to end, preferring to just let them play out and enjoy the ride. However, I couldn't help but seeing the ending of this one coming from a mile away. (For the record, I'm completely unfamiliar with the source novel and earlier film.)
1.) The first scene with the original geek, I thought: "Hm, whoever that actor is playing the geek, he almost looks like a bearded, homeless version of Bradley Cooper. Wonder if there's anything to that.."
2.) A bit later, there's a full scene with Willem Dafoe explaining to Cooper how the circus "acquires" a geek--hooking desperate drunks, then slowly and deviously manipulating them into becoming full-time geeks. I'm thinking, "Okay, interesting scene, but there must be some significance to it. Why is he explaining the process in such detail? Why specifically to Cooper? It was a rather immoral, disturbing (and even illegal) process to be freely explaining (and admitting involvement in) to someone you've only recently met and are yet to fully trust.
3.) After being staunchly against alcohol the whole film, Cooper finally takes his first drink with Blanchett, toasting to their "success" (or something similar). At this point, I actually said aloud: "Oh, he's going to end up as one of those circus geeks from the beginning."
I didn't feel like I was making any bold prediction; it just seemed obvious.
However, since viewing the film, I've spoken to a few people who were apparently shocked by the ending. So I'm not trying to boast or claiming to be smarter than anyone else--I'm really just wondering whether or not del Toro actually intended this to be a "twist" or "surprise ending".
Does anyone know? Or share my own sentiments regarding the ending? Surely there are others who saw it coming as well.