Daily Mail review gives it 1/5 stars
share
It is time for Rings of Dogshit to get the roasting it deserves.
I can't wait.
Damn, even legacy media is throwing it under the bus.
shareWhat a deeply racist review. Disgusting.
shareAnd here is AckbarsRevenge, a TROLL. Get back under your bridge, loser!
Lol kid, what's wrong? Playing movie chat Blockwart?
shareOh no! Someone isn't taking internet message boards seriously? Is there someone to report him to so that these boards can get closed down like IMDb did because of all the thin-skinned pussies who reported anonymous people on the internet for being mean.
shareReally? Now I gotta read it
shareI didn't find the racist part. bait and switch
sharePathetic trolling! The majority are 3/4* or higher. Highest:
https://www.thedailybeast.com/obsessed/amazons-lord-of-the-rings-series-the-rings-of-power-puts-house-of-the-dragon-to-shame
Thats strange. Many of the reviews I've seen were not favorable.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/tv/2022/08/31/lord-rings-tv-show-review/
https://ew.com/tv/tv-reviews/lord-of-the-rings-rings-of-power-amazon/
https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/31/entertainment/the-lord-of-the-rings-review/index.html
https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20220830-rings-of-power-review-a-visually-staggering-but-flawed-epic
Daily beast is the shittiest publication ever created - try again
share"Pathetic trolling!"
I agree but you shouldn't be so harsh on yourself due to your massive retardation.
1. That rag has no credibility.
2. The reviewer repeatedly complains about the budget. Jealous much?
It's a conservative paper, not really a rag, in the UK that means tabloids, like the sun, mirror etc.
The leftists hate the Mail, so it's got some credibility.
It's a crap paper with no credibility:
Detailed Report
Questionable Reasoning: Right, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Some Fake News, Numerous Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: RIGHT
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: United Kingdom
Press Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Newspaper
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/daily-mail/
The Daily Mail is the best FREE source of news in the world. There are probably better sources BUT they are locked behind a paywall. The Daily Mail is also a digest so the articles can be quickly read. Some publications have infromative twenty page articles that the DM will cover in two or three pages. I read the DM every damn day. These media bias websites only look at ten articles to come up with their rating. Due to my time spent reading Daily Mail, I have been able to discuss events all over the globe with foreigners and I have even alerted them to events in their own country.
While the Daily Mail was founded in 1896, Media Bias Fact Check has only been around since 2015. Additionally, the MBFC founder has ZERO media experience. He has a few volunteers BUT it doesn't look like he has a qualified staff. I could start up my website and make ratings BUT I am able to determine the reliability of a source after monitoring the news for close to FORTY years. Ad Fontes Media came out with a chart and they put the DM in the middle of the chart.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/about/ * MBFC don't know JACK! *
https://adfontesmedia.com/static-mbc/?utm_source=HomePage_StaticMBC_Image&utm_medium=OnWebSite_Link
* Ad Fontes Media Chart - Daily Mail looks good - Suck it Leftist Wacko! *
It's still a crap paper. Enjoy reading it, but don't take it as the gospel truth. Btw, a movie/series review is only a personal opinion. This show has mixed reviews.
My turnoff re: his review was his unending whining about the expensive budget. Who cares? He reminded me of another reviewer who hated a movie because she didn't like the actor's new haircut. (That was Brad Pitt in the movie Seven).
Credible conservative broadsheet is The Telegraph. Unlike you, I don't have a problem with reading different viewpoints. But don't mistake crap for the truth.
The hostile critic is angry probably because he has a low salary.
Of course Keeliar is the leading expert on credibility, having none whatsoever himself.
Telegraph gave the series 3 out of 5.
The leftists hate the Mail, so it's got some credibility.
great logic.
The paper is a shitstain that sells pages by telling far right white people that immgrants are getting free houses,
and other things to be "outraged" at
'far right' lol. Do you really think England is overrun by the actual far right? Fucking clown.
share[deleted]
Entertainment Weekly said it was terrible too.
https://ew.com/tv/tv-reviews/lord-of-the-rings-rings-of-power-amazon/
Bigoted right wing arrogance, ostrich like behaviour and paranoia.
No cred. Just boring old racist farts
[deleted]
Lol, CNN didn't like it. Are they right wing bigots?
https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/31/entertainment/the-lord-of-the-rings-review/index.html
It's difficult to say which is worse, the show or the "newspaper". I'd give both 1 star, if that.
share