Typical of Netflix to have homosexual relationship before a heterosexual relationship is shown.
I have not seen every Star trek, I have seen some of it, as far as I am aware sexual relationships were at the minimum and definitely not the focus of the show.
To even have to show homosexual relationship is shocking, to show it before even a normal heterosexual relationship is shocking and takes away from the story of the show and is a great disservice to all the actors and everyone involved.
What next a transexual Klingon? Get the fuck out of here with your cultural Marxism bullshit.
What's wrong with showing a homosexual couple in a sci-do series? Is it that big of an issue? In reality, no. Homosexual couples exists, and in the future they will still exist, and this show is about the future. Have an issue with it? Don't watch the show, and move on.
a) sexual relationships, whether about anal sex or not. Was not significant part of the star trek story, ever.
b) they had not even shown a hetrosexual relationship yet. So a gay relationships which is like 1% of the population must be shown but a normal fucking relationship is not shown.
It is just typical of netflix. I am just waiting for the transexual Klingon and the normalise paedophile story line. Why not add in some sex with an alien, just to make the show as fucking edgy and hip as possible. Because everyone needs a bit of weird ass anal sex with an alien's arm pit.
The show is ruined now and fuck you if you call me a anti gay, i don't care if you want to fuck each other in the ass.
If two people brushing their teeth is too sexual for you, or there is a priority order of relationship types that you need your programming to follow, then I agree with MichaelPacino. This just isn't a show for you to watch. Also, from what I understand, Netflix had nothing to do with this show's content. They put up money for streaming rights but the show was directly produced by CBS.
At this point I have to ask... did you even WATCH the original Trek? Kirk was a NOTORIOUS womanizer, and his escapades with the sexy "babe of the week" were legendary. And yes, that included sex with aliens (green Orion slave girls) and other alien species who may have been humanoid... but not human. Spock was the product of a Vulcan and Human marriage... again, a human female having sex with an alien. B'Elanna Torres (from Voyager) was the product of a human and Klingon marriage. Kirk was strongly getting it on with some shape-shifter of unknown form in "Star Trek" The Undiscovered Country".
Several classic episodes were based around relationships and the conflicts that arise from lust and longing. The TOS episode "Is there no truth in beauty" involved the strong reaction one human male felt when the woman he loved was more in love with a Medusan. Kirk used sexual attraction to turn Shahna to his side in "The Gamesters of Triskelion". The conflicted feelings between sexual love and paternal love led to the death of the android Rayna in "Requiem for Methuselah". I could go on and on...
So, your whole point about sex, sexual relationships, and sex with aliens has been with us since the advent of Star Trek.
To your bullet points, as well:
a) Not all homosexual relationships between men involves anal sex... that is a gross generalization made by people who have no real understanding of relationships and use the "well, it's anal and gross, so that's why gays are bad" excuse. Just because two men enjoy a sexual relationship does not mean it involves anal, any more so than a heterosexual relationship (and trust me, there are plenty of straight men who DO love anal sex... just with a woman).
b) Actually, 4% of the US population identifies as LBGTQ... which equates to roughly 12 million people. I was also not aware that love and relationships were races, and we had to quantify the order in which they were presented.
Your rantings here are totally unwarranted and show that you are simply espousing your agenda of hate, without any basis in fact. The very fact that you have no understanding of the history of Star Trek itself, how it has always pushed cultural boundaries, and how SEX, yes, SEX, was always popping up in the show somewhere, shows you aren't really speaking as an informed fan of the series. For crying out loud... we're talking about the show that had an episode banned for years in the south because it had the audacity, in the 1960's, to show a white man kissing a black woman. Star Trek has ALWAYS been about pushing preconceived notions of what constitutes "normal".
Your comments, on the other hand, are just hate, pure and simple.
>> I have to ask... did you even WATCH the original Trek? <<
I certainly did. Kirk had sex twice during the entire run of the show, and one of those times, he was suffering from amnesia and thought he was a native american named "Kirok", so he wasn't himself in that episode.
The "Kirk banged green skinned girls every episode" is the one of the most inaccurate myths about Star Trek.
I take you do not live in the US. I hope you understand that Netflix did not create the show they are just showing it outside the US. CBS, I believe, is the company that produces the show so if you are going to be mad at anyone it should not be Netflix.
Why is showing a homesexual relationship shocking in and of itself? For it to be shocking it would have to be unprecedented and there are plenty of shows with homosexual relationships. You can say that it is unprecedented for Star Trek but the last Star Trek series was over 10 years ago and story lines have expanded since then.
"definitely not the focus of the show. " Well it is a good thing then as it is far from being the focus of the show. FYI, do not watch The Orville. You have been warned.
I personally would prefer it not be a story point but I would also prefer for there to be no romantic relationships at all.
I think the introduction was handled poorly. These two should have had a similar scene at the start to establish the relationship so we would have been more in tune with them. The way it was done was to create shock value (note I say the way it was done was to create shock value and not that the relationship itself is shocking to me) and once we get past the "they are gay ... OOOOOOO" type of story telling and just have it be easily established two same gender type are together in a more subtle way things will pass smoother.
What do you expect from Hollywood DORAMA and DRIVEL? They just love pushing agendas and boundaries by trying to raise awareness or rather annoyances to the mass public about minorities and diverseness while ignoring good plot and action. Same reason they loved Harvey Weinstein or rather kept a hush hush cause of money or business ethics.
"Infinite Diversity in Infinite Combinations"
- the basis of Vulcan philosophy
Star Trek was always a progressive program with a diverse cast while addressing social issues. I'm surprised by how many conservatives are unaware of Trek's history.
The Orville which is more popular with Trek fans has a more unique way of showing a same sex couple. Moclus is a planet that is at least 99.99% male so they have a male couple on the ship who just had a baby girl (rare) and fought to give her a gender change to male.
Discovery's homosexual couple seems dull in comparison.
At least with Orville, each new episode is allowing us to learn more about the different crew members. That episode told volumes about the attitudes, culture, personalities, and marriage of Bortus and Klyden.
Character-driven sci-fi with original stories to tell instead of mindless space battles. A bridge crew that watches episodes of Seinfeld on their viewscreen is alright by me. Down-to-earth, laidback, funny and fun.
Nothing more dull than Star Trek:Dreary and their stick up the ***** crew.
Continue to watch Star Trek:Discovery. Mindless and dumb. It should be relatable to you.
You'll want the last word, so be my guest. Don't swallow to much dirt. R.I.P. as you dig further in your little hole.
The Orville is horribly written. The last episode had the MacFarlane and Grimes acting like they were is a wacky comedy and everyone else acting as if they were in a serious sci-fi show.
The episode with the gender change. The security officer is brought into the trial to show that a female is not weak but she is only stronger than men because of her planet's gravity. This is brought up by the prosecutor also saying that "I am sure the males on her planet are stronger than her" to which the defence replies "We do not know that so lets ignore that" And the prosecutor drops that line of questioning,
THAT is poorly written because the prosecutor should actually bring up the fact that the security officer's specialties is IRRELEVANT because the rule applies to Moclans.
The episode with the big ship and the space traveling colony: They never follow up on Liam Neeson's character. They just left him in the building where he was torturing the ex-wife and then just acted as if telling the rebels the secret would solve EVERYTHING!!! Seriously, learn how to close of plotlines.
"They never follow up on Liam Neeson's character. "
What's to follow up? His character has been dead for centuries and has been worshipped as a God by his people. The writing is fine. Your comprehension is low.
"THAT is poorly written because the prosecutor should actually bring up the fact that the security officer's specialties is IRRELEVANT because the rule applies to Moclans. "
Again, you miss the point. The trail was always irrelevant because it was never going to be a fair since the Moclans are heavily biased against females. The trial outcome was going to be in favor of a sex change no matter what evidence was brought. I suggest you look up the term "kangeroo court".
MacFarlane uses physical and social stereotypes to define gender. He uses female as a euphemism for sterile, weak, and passive. Male is a euphemism for strong, fertile, and dominant. This is supposed to be progressive social commentary on gender.
I hope you are aware that you are watching a fiction therefore the writers can create any reality that they want. In their reality, two male Moclans can reproduce. If watching fiction brings such distress, then I recommend you stop watching and stick to PBS documentaries.
BTW, human hermaphrodites are sterile. Why don't people on this site know anything about basic human sexuality?
I am aware I am watching fiction but that does not mean that nothing needs to make sense. It is still a story where they base the story on things we understand.
In their reality, two male Moclans can reproduce.
This is not necessarily the case. Perhaps they are asexual and only one of the two produces young but their society has come to the conclusion that two parents are better than 1.
reply share
In the episode they reproduce sexually by spawning. One lays an egg, another fertilizes it. Asexual reproduction is not discussed but is a possibility since each individual is both male and female biologically. Male and female in the story are used to describe a social distinction between fertile and sterile. Basically it's just really sexist and bigoted writing posing as social commentary.
"I have not seen every Star trek, I have seen some of it, as far as I am aware sexual relationships were at the minimum and definitely not the focus of the show."
It's not the focus of the show. You're just being silly and hysterical.
"To even have to show homosexual relationship is shocking. . ."
Only to cultural neanderthals whose minds are stuck in the past.
Six Feet Under is one of my all-time favourite TV dramas. One of the main characters is gay and his love life is a very big part of the show, and none of it bothered me one bit. But on Star Trek I don't like it. There is no reason for having a gay couple other than to fill the gay quota.
The problem with pointing this out is some people are so determined to protect their point of view that they don't see your point here. Some see you being homophobic and will just sidestep your past non issue with gay relationships.
This was my concern for this show, there was this big kick about diversity for a series of shows that have already been diverse, hell the show in the 60s had a key black female cast member, another that was Asian male.
Is what we see on screen now a Star Trek show or some groups personal agenda being pushed on people in the skin of Star Trek? Is the gay relationship here because it was part of the natural writing process of the characters or because someone was checking of a diversity card like they did with Sulu's character that was so tacky the original actor for Sulu who is gay called them out on it?
I am still going to reserve judgement until I can really sit down and watch it. I am hoping it will make it to Netflix in some form once the season has completed.
in Six Feet Under Michael C. Hall acted as a gay man, where here both actors are gay.
Any way I dont see a problem, would love to see one of the crew and an androian getting it on.