Never Hillary!!


After watching this movie, I would think anyone that would vote for Hillary Clinton as the next president of the United States is crazy. Hillary Clinton is a disgrace to this country. I hope the brave men that died in Benghazi haunt Hillary for the rest of her days.

reply

I am from the UK and I urge all Americans to vote Trump. He is an A**hole, but so are most politicians. But he is exactly what America needs right now. Many parts of the UK has been took over by Migrants. It is like Afghanistan in some parts of England. Europe is infested with them. Look at what has been happening in Europe especially France. You need a leader who is not afraid to face this threat head on. Let him do the base work in the 5 years then elect someone else. But let Europe be a lesson to you. Vote Trump I'm serious.

reply

Well im not for Hillary im a Bernie voter. Will be voting Jill Stein. I did however have a neutral stance on Brexit and could understand it as it seemed off that almost all of the "yes" votes were concentrated in and around London where all the wealthy people are. That seemed odd to me, so maybe it was not helping the regular people, and benefiting the wealthy. More people, = more customers = more profits for the business owners and the wealthy. So they would be for it, while it leaves others without a job or really no benefit at all. I do not however think Trump is correct in that building a wall is not an answer here. Mexico will not pay for 100% of any "wall" and then keeping it maintained, staffed, and running would be extremely expensive as well and that border is like 10 times the size of the UK keep in mind. Then they can also just go above/below the wall as they do the current fence. But yes, I do believe there is an issue, but America does not need a giant wall, we are already limiting the amount of refugees being accepted to a certain %, so we don't even need that so I will not be voting for Trump. (nor Hillary) But yes, I agree there are some issues there, with mass migration which has been happening in Europe. I may have voted for Brexit if I was in the UK.

reply

Well im not for Hillary im a Bernie voter. Will be voting Jill Stein. I did however have a neutral stance on Brexit and could understand it as it seemed off that almost all of the "yes" votes were concentrated in and around London where all the wealthy people are. That seemed odd to me, so maybe it was not helping the regular people, and benefiting the wealthy. More people, = more customers = more profits for the business owners and the wealthy. So they would be for it, while it leaves others without a job or really no benefit at all. I do not however think Trump is correct in that building a wall is not an answer here. Mexico will not pay for 100% of any "wall" and then keeping it maintained, staffed, and running would be extremely expensive as well and that border is like 10 times the size of the UK keep in mind. Then they can also just go above/below the wall as they do the current fence. But yes, I do believe there is an issue, but America does not need a giant wall, we are already limiting the amount of refugees being accepted to a certain %, so we don't even need that so I will not be voting for Trump. (nor Hillary) But yes, I agree there are some issues there, with mass migration which has been happening in Europe. I may have voted for Brexit if I was in the UK.

reply

I do not however think Trump is correct in that building a wall is not an answer here. Mexico will not pay for 100% of any "wall" and then keeping it maintained, staffed, and running would be extremely expensive as well and that border is like 10 times the size of the UK keep in mind.


Like I've heard one US Politician say "you show me a 30 foot wall and I'll show a 31 foot ladder!". The US-Mexico border is a massive length of 1,989 miles (3,201 km) with the Rio Grande official river border measurement ranges from 889 miles (1,431 km) to 1,248 miles (2,008 km), depending on how the river is measured. The cost of a wall on the land not the Rio Grande river border would cost BILLIONS and BILLIONS:

If all of that infrastructure—the agents, the vehicles, the facilities—sounds big and expensive, it is. In fact, the border security complex today is almost mind-bogglingly expensive, more than the combined budgets of the Interior Department and the Commerce Department. Today, even as Trump bashes the Obama administration for a laissez-faire approach to the border, the U.S. spends more money each year on border and immigration enforcement than the combined budgets of the FBI, ATF, DEA, the Secret Service and the U.S. Marshals—plus the entire NYPD’s annual budget. Over the past 15 years, more than $100 billion has poured into border security, including more than 660 miles of fences and walls, and the Border Patrol has seen a transformative and dramatic growth spurt. The patrol, which doubled during Bill Clinton’s presidency to about 8,000 agents, surged again after 9/11, and doubled a second time in the final years of George W. Bush’s presidency. The Border Patrol’s parent agency, Customs and Border Protection, has grown now to more than 46,000 gun-carrying law enforcement officers and agents—the largest police force in the country—and DHS is trying to hire an additional 2,000 CBP officers right now.

Originally CBP Agents even when illegal immigrants or drug smugglers when trying to swim across the Rio Grande river were not allowed to engage to repel them until they actually were out of the water and on US Soil. That was until Border Patrol Chief said Agents can shoot even at rock throwers on the Mexican side of the border:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/mar/9/border-patrol-chief-agents-can-still-shoot-at-rock/

U.S. Border Patrol agents can still use deadly force to respond to rock-throwing attacks along the border, even though they must take care in assessing whether their lives are in danger, Border Patrol Chief Michael J. Fisher said in a new directive Friday.

The guidance comes at a time when Border Patrol agents are under scrutiny for their response to rock-throwing instances along the U.S.-Mexico border, which had resulted in several deaths when agents have fired back with their service firearms.

Critics have argued that there is no reason to shoot back at those throwing rocks, while agents and their defenders argue that the rocks are often small boulders that could kill or seriously injure someone.

Since 2010, the Border Patrol counted 1,713 instances where rocks were thrown at agents. The agents responded with deadly force in 43 cases, resulting in 10 deaths.

Since 2007, the Border Patrol said, there have been more than 6,000 assaults on agents, and three agents have been killed.




If you are not willing to give up everything, you have already lost

reply

Never indeed!

TE HE TE HETE HE

reply

They should be making a movies on the 19 embassy attacks that happend under Mr.WMDs watch and on 241 Marines that died in Beirut under Saint Ronnie's watch

reply

Threads like this are what happens when people get their news and history lessons from movies. 😒



(Response notification is off.)

reply

I'm still waiting for the movie about the 60 dead and 13 attacked embassies under Bush...

reply

I'm still waiting for the movie about the 60 dead and 13 attacked embassies under Bush...

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2014/may/12/john-garamendi/prior-benghazi-were-there-13-attacks-embassies-and/

reply

Yeah the embassy attack was part of zero dark thirty-the Tallywhackers shot at the embassy but the embassy guards responded. Then again...how long did those attacks last? Did Bush have a few hours to respond to it? We talking about the milisecond from the firing of the RPG round to the time it struck the building or the car bomb detonated? Did anybody spend hours calling for help & were told to F/k off? Did any of these attacks take place in a place where there was 'no law or security' from the government or did they take place in areas where local police/military handled it?

Please elaborate how Dubya should respond?






Why can't you wretched prey creatures understand that the Universe doesn't owe you anything!?

reply

How about a movie on the 236 people killed on Bill Clinton's watch.

reply

How about the movie about the 8 billion that will be killed on the Donald's watch. Maybe aliens can make that one.

For who would bear the whips and scorns of Hollywood... (;-p)

reply