This Page Needs to be Closed Down! - Ellen Page (2013) Discussion

[–] [deleted] 2 years ago

He was a woman at the time of the episode. He is not now. Do you understand now?

reply

[–] HarveyManFredSin (4877) 2 years ago

I think a lot of posters here are trolling by posting on this page rather than on Elliot Page's actual page. It's 'covert' transphobia by people who *think* they're being 'clever'.

reply

[–] [deleted] 2 years ago

It's not transphobia it's good old insecurity that makes them want to bully the weak.
And some have unresolved sexuality/gender issues themselves.

It's quite amusing to join them in the bullying, actually.

reply

[–] Corbell (11001) 2 years ago

I might be insecure about some things...

Which SEX I am, is not one of them. And I strongly suspect, not for very many people.

LOL!!

reply

[–] chilone (18316) 2 years ago

No. She's still a woman and always will be.

reply

[–] Kendricks (2241) 2 years ago

Cold facts.

reply

[–] ak47wong (639) 2 years ago

This page is about an episode of The Daily Show. The episodes are named after the person being interviewed or featured. This episode aired 20 May 2013 and was titled "Ellen Page" as that person was the guest at the time. Here's the IMDb entry for the episode: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2904886

How dare you! 👊🏿

Is that a threat of violence?

reply

[–] HarveyManFredSin (4877) 2 years ago

'A threat of violence'?

If that's what the emoji entails, perhaps you should take it up with the people who generate them.

No, it's 'figurative' violence. I don't believe in *actual* violence. It's just a quick/easy way of expressing my anger.

Besides, who would I be threatening violence against?

reply

[–] [deleted] 2 years ago

"Is that a threat of violence?"

Cut the bad faith bullshit. The first step to freeing people from the wokist cult is refusing to play their childish games with them. They pull this bad faith shit all the time. Be better than that.

reply

[–] ak47wong (639) 2 years ago

I don't know what you're talking about.

reply

[–] [deleted] 2 years ago

That doesn't surprise me.

reply

[–] Destinata (3564) 2 years ago

Dead naming. Okay. What about the people who regret the surgery? If s/he decides s/he wants to go back to where s/he was, then you'd have not given them the ability to do so. And yes, this happens a lot. One of my favorite follows on Twitter is @NotScottNewgent. It happens.

reply

[–] HarveyManFredSin (4877) 2 years ago

Has *HE* regretted any surgery, as far as you know?

We're talking about *Elliot* Page here. Not any other trans individual.

reply

[–] Destinata (3564) 2 years ago

I'm talking about "dead naming" and showing how it can change with how a person feels.

One doctor who did the surgery finally admitted, "We're treating feelings, here." Well, feelings change. The last you heard, "Elliot" hadn't changed her mind about her cosmetic surgery to make her physical self look a bit more like her feelings. Biologically, she will always be female down to the molecular level.

I don't know if you're old enough to remember that the Soviets used to do sex change operations on men so their "women" could win Olympic medals. But they got to the point where they'd do scrapings of the inside of their mouths to test and see if they were actually women or not. All they could do was change their outside appearance. Poor "Elliot" changed her outside appearance, but she's still a woman.

Whether "Elliot" regrets it or not, only she knows for sure. So far a you know, she doesn't. Then again, maybe -- in this political climate -- she does, and she's afraid to say.

reply

[–] seagal72 (2012) 2 years ago

She is a girl.
Always will be a girl.
No amount of bullshit rhetoric, medication nor surgery will ever alter that.

Now keep repeating what I've written (either to yourself or better yet, out loud) until it sinks in.

Thanks in advance.

reply

[–] [deleted] 2 years ago

All fetuses start out as female, sweetheart. According to your logic you are still a girl.
Go fuck yourself and quit being an INCEL.

reply

[–] seagal72 (2012) 2 years ago

[deleted]

[–] [deleted] 2 years ago

There is no need. You live in a prison-like social system already. It's not fair at all and you have my sympathies.

reply

[–] seagal72 (2012) 2 years ago

Shittest (apologist, compensatory) comeback ever

reply

[–] [deleted] 2 years ago

I agree. Yet you posted it anyway. Half a century of wasted opportunity.

reply

[–] HarveyManFredSin (4877) 2 years ago

Seeing as you appear to be roughly on the same side as me on this issue, I'm still perplexed as to why you criticised me for calling out this page, and the people who are posting here.

reply

[–] [deleted] 2 years ago

Sides? This is just friendly anonymous banter. We are how we treat each other in the flesh. Bashing or praising avatars is so people learn not to emotionally associate themselves with them.

reply

[–] HarveyManFredSin (4877) 2 years ago

Fair enough. I don't necessarily disagree, and I think this approach (separating anonymous online discourse, to how we treat one another in other contexts, particularly in the flesh) is a mature and psychologically healthy one, but I'm still curious as to why you criticised me earlier on. Not that I'm going to take offence/get massively upset about it. 🙂

reply

[–] Oskar (315) 2 years ago

She still identified as a woman at the time. Erasing herstory won't change it.

reply

[–] seagal72 (2012) 2 years ago

Neither will pointless 'pro-nouns' or surgery

reply

[–] [deleted] 2 years ago

[deleted]

[–] Oskar (315) 2 years ago

Not HIStory.

reply

[–] [deleted] 2 years ago

[deleted]

[–] MCguy (1346) 2 years ago

Please ask your coders for that upgrade. Your post is just an example of how AI bots (like yourself) really can't learn.

Episodes of TV show have entries in IMDB; this is an episode of a TV show. Moviechat is populated from IMDB boards. Even if the MC admins deleted it, it would come back when MC updates from IMDB.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2904886/?ref_=fn_tt_tt_1

reply

[–] Bloodworth79 (5737) 2 years ago

The other day in the dr office she was discussing what size hot dog she was going to sew on.
Dr said 5-6 inches was more suited for her body size.
She is pushing for a 12 incher.

reply

[–] queefqueen (49) 2 years ago

She wasn't attractive then, and she's extra nasty (and titless lol) now.

A future 41% club member, for sure!

reply

[–] [deleted] 2 years ago

Porn has already begun to lose its luster to you. Seek therapy for you'll end up in jail or dead like this.

reply

[–] queefqueen (49) 2 years ago

lol fag

reply

[–] [deleted] 2 years ago

lol fag

That's quite obvious with your username. Does not change the advice.

reply

[–] queefqueen (49) 2 years ago

glad we agree thats what you are lol! dilate harder.

but i can't take your kind's advice, the whole "cut off body parts because of mental iillness" thing steers me clear.

reply

[–] HarveyManFredSin (4877) 2 years ago

'Fag'?

What is this? The mid-1980s? Are we still mocking people for being gay in this day and age?

reply

[–] BeaSouth (3560) 2 years ago

On this site? I see so-called progressive posters routinely accusing people of being closeted gay as if it was an insult. They may talk “live and let live” but when they get in an angry exchange, they go right to emasculation and accusations of concealed homosexuality as if its the most effective ridicule

reply

[–] HarveyManFredSin (4877) 2 years ago

I'm pretty sure that queefqueen isn't a 'progressive', so the point doesn't really apply here, but to address your particular observation, I certainly don't agree with the hypocrisy you refer to either. Faux-liberal hypocrisy and fellow self-identifying progressives thinking they have a shield when it comes to displaying racist, misogynist and/or homophobic behaviour is a real bugbear of mine. I routinely call out such nonsense, but that doesn't mean that open and honest right-wing racist/misogynist/homophobic bigots get a pass either (other than to say that *at least* they're not hypocrites).

reply

[–] queefqueen (49) 2 years ago

Yep!

reply

[–] HarveyManFredSin (4877) 2 years ago

What does this body-shaming bullshit achieve, exactly? Does it make you feel better?

reply

[–] [deleted] 2 years ago

It's all they have, most likely. Who spends time here yet has a healthy social life?
Steers and queers and plenty have just the one horn.

reply