Why does Justine lie?
At the end of the film when she is back in the US she lies and says the villagers are peaceful and that the loggers slaughtered them all. Why does she lie? To protect them? Why??
shareAt the end of the film when she is back in the US she lies and says the villagers are peaceful and that the loggers slaughtered them all. Why does she lie? To protect them? Why??
sharewould you kill all wild animals in amazon because they can eat a human? this is their natural life. if a tiger hunt a human nobody call it a killer. she noticed that and let them live there. this is nature rule.
shareMaybe she lied cause those freaks put some sort of weird curse or spell on her... Just a thought
shareOh, so you mean the people of this native tribe are just a bunch of wild animals, totally driven by instinct and incapable of rational thought like, say, a jaguar or a python?
In other words, they're not human, and can't help themselves; it's just their nature.
That's not even close to the same thing.
Human's are supposed to know better and be more evolved. Also it's not like they killed these guys in their sleep, they all had horrifying deaths. Especially the first guy. He had his eyes, tongue & everything until he eventually died. If I saw that, there's no way I would have lied when I got back.
Some people say that she did it to save the boy, but wouldnt he get killed for helping her in the first place anyway? i certainly wouldnt put it past them to kill a boy, seeing what they were capable of.
The tribe should be killed, even if it was their "nature" to kill and they were just "animals"; with that logic, its justifiable to kill them, because of Darwinist "survival of the fittest" - we have the guns, we take your land. After all, the tribe didnt think twice about using weapons against the prisoners.
And to say the others would have died for nothing if she gave up the tribe? If I was killed by cannibals I thought was worth protecting, I would definately want Justine to rat them out and get the wiped of the surface of the earth.
Because this movie is essentially a remake of Cannibal Ferox and the surviving character does the same thing at the end of that movie too.
shareIt seems that everybody else who responded either did not know why she lied or completely forgot the scene where Alejandro told them the truth. That scene was there specifically to pave the way for the twist ending.
Alejandro explained that they were not in fact saving the village at all, that they were there simply to make a public spectacle to delay one company from razing the village long enough to allow a competing company to beat them to it. The reason that he went along with it, knowing full-well that it was futile was not to save that village, but as a “photoshoot” as he said, to raise awareness and gain fame for the group so that they could make a difference with other causes for which they actually stand a chance.
She lied because she realized that if she told the truth, people would be less upset about a village of primitive, barbaric savages being wiped out, and things would go back to normal (and the group would probably even get ridiculed and discredited for trying to save them). However, if she made them out to be gentle recluses who saved her, then there would be a lot more outrage over the incident, and the group could continue to fight for other causes more effectively.
(Response notification is off.)
It's really simple actually. There's 3 reasons why she lies. In no particular order.
1. The boy saves her life, she owes him.
2. By lying she saves that section of the Amazon which is what the rest of the group gave their lives for.
3. If she tells the truth that also includes telling the truth about leaving that guy behind, making her look bad and possibly facing legal action from his family.
Why is this so difficult to understand?
3. If she tells the truth that also includes telling the truth about leaving that guy behind, making her look bad and possibly facing legal action from his family.I tried to rescue him but cannibals attacked me and I needed to save myself.
3. If she tells the truth that also includes telling the truth about leaving that guy behind, making her look bad and possibly facing legal action from his family.
It's really simple actually. There's 3 reasons why she lies. In no particular order.
1. The boy saves her life, she owes him.
2. By lying she saves that section of the Amazon which is what the rest of the group gave their lives for.
3. If she tells the truth that also includes telling the truth about leaving that guy behind, making her look bad and possibly facing legal action from his family.
Why is this so difficult to understand?
But that's what doesn't make sense. Why would anyone want to preserve a bunch of savage, bloodthirsty cannibals who indiscriminately and very cruelly slaughter anyone not of their tribe who crosses their path. Just what is it, exactly, about a culture like that that anyone would find worth preserving?
Within the context of the movie, this is shown to be a tribe of utter barbarians -- not natives who are just different, but bloodthirsty savages who seem to positively delight in causing human suffering. I repeat, just what is it, exactly, about a culture like that that anyone would find worth preserving?
And given that Alejandro's group turn out to be, not sincere environmentalists, but in reality nothing more than just a bunch of cynical mercenaries who lie and manipulate people, and take money from one exploiter to stage a spectacle that will actually benefit another, why would anyone want to save that group from being revealed for what it really is? That group won't "fight for other causes more effectively;" it will just go on pretending to fight for other causes while actually taking more blood money from one gang of thugs to act against another.
They weren't attacking them for no reason. The group of environmentalists were wearing the uniforms of the people cutting down the forest. They did that to infiltrate that group. So when the natives see them wearing the same uniforms, and no way to communicate their true intentions, they are mistaken for the people destroying their land.
shareWhich might give them a legitimate casus belli -- it does not give them a legitimate reason to practice torture and cannibalism, and to take clear, sadistic pleasure in the practicing.
shareIt also doesn't give them legitimate reason to start savagely murdering people right out of the gate. They didn't just take these college kids prisoner
Death Awaits (Horror forum)
http://w11.zetaboards.com/Death_Awaits/index/
They didn't know they were innocent college kids. The concept of college is not something they would even know. They saw some people wander onto their land wearing the uniforms of the people who were savagely destroying their land. That's all they knew, and they took their revenge. They're a primitive culture, it's going to have its flaws. We have no idea if they would have been welcoming and friendly if the kids didn't have those uniforms on.
shareEven so the natives could of just killed them if they saw them as a threat, Eating them had nothing to do with that fact. instead they made sure to torture them brutally and kill them after. They hunt and killed defenseless people for sport and ate them for fun because they had live stock so it’s not like they were starving and just decided to eat them. Not only did they have 5-8 dead bodies from the crash and Kara to eat they had live stock and still tortured, killed, and ate 4 people within 2 days. Which was not necessary as Alejandro said their friend (who was killed first) should have lasted about a week 2-3 days at least. Yet they finished both humans and were on the third body when they ingested the marijuana then ate the other man alive. With that being said that village was a set of man eating cannibalistic Natives who practices should not be continued and should not have been protected, lied for, or preserved. Cannibalism and hunting defenseless targets for sport is not a culture it is a crime and should be dealt with most villages aren’t like that and should be protected but not them the ultimate goal is to preserve the forest and save the jungle forget them man eating humans
shareI got the impression that it was because ultimately by lying she archived what she and the other's set out to archive , the reason I think this is because of the scene on the plane after the demonstration and Justine is pissed understandably and Jonah says to her too look out the window she looks down at the jungle and he then says you helped save it and she smiles , but that's my opinion
shareIt doesn't make any sense to lie when the truth is going to be revealed when they find the crash site and the dead bodies.
shareThat is an excellent point that I didn't think of. I assumed if the bulldozers were called off nobody would find the plane, and ultimately the truth, but the families of the victims would of course want the bodies recovered. She would have to craft some reason in the lie to discourage them from looking for the plane. Bottom of a lake, some scavenger type animals ate the remains, or something. But she apparently gets caught in the lie anyway so it don't matter.
shareI don't know Eli Roth's politics, but its like how some liberals support the "oppressed" people even after all their bad experiences. Like the social justice warrior who goes to Detroit to help the inner city but ends up being robbed by gangsters. There are Western liberal volunteers who have gone to Gaza to support the Palestinian and been killed by Muslim terrorists, yet they still support the Palestinian cause.
shareThis may sound weird, but in the end of Cannibal Ferox (a film that Roth has cited as an influence here), the female survivor of the ordeal lies about what happened to her. Maybe the ending of The Green Inferno is a tribute to that film. I don't know. I think the ending of Inferno was awful, and the "credits" twist was lame.
the ending of Ferox was more believable, perhaps because the actress playing the survivor of the carnage looked really beat down and sad by the whole thing at the end of the movie. The girl in Inferno doesn't show any signs of her ordeal.
Clearly she's in love with her saviour and wants to go back and play Jane to his Tarzan. If she hadn't lied hecould have been slaughtered as one of the monsters. The sequel will be similar to George of the jungle 2 or junglecto jungle...uhm hmm
share