MovieChat Forums > Dark Places (2015) Discussion > Chloe Grace Moretz is wrong for Diondra

Chloe Grace Moretz is wrong for Diondra


She's a good actress, but I always pictured Diondra as being more midwestern husky.
Very pretty, but country chunky and a deeper voice.

I'm thinking more like teenaged Christine McGlade from You Can't Do That on Television.

reply

I agree. Chloe's going to have to work hard to pull off a believable young Diondra, who was both emotionally and physically abusive to Ben. Diondra never came across as a slip of a waif in the novel. Flynn goes into detail about Diondra being emotionally overtaxing, physically aggressive, and even that she wore men's designer dress shoes (even her feet were emasculating to poor Ben).

reply

Although I think Moretz did a capable job in this role, I understand the point many are making. Sometimes movie casting thinks they can completely forget the part that physical appearance, especially in size, which plays a part in characterization.

Not having even read the book, I can believe that the character was intended to be a kind of mid-western stock that read husky. Big more like the actress who played Simone in Season 2 of Fargo. Chloe reads waif physically. I think waif-like fit Libby more and it's my understanding that the novel said the character was really short.

Ben seemed to be someone who was submissive and could easily dominated by physically big and aggressive woman.

reply

have you seen her 30 rock episodes because she is more than fit for the part?

reply

[deleted]

So no, you haven't seen them.

reply

Agreed, I just don't see it at. all.

reply

She's perfect. See her 30 rock episodes for proof

reply

Proof of her over acting and "I'm trying to seem badass by squinting my eyes and pouting my lips a lot, and talking in this weird breathy voice" demeanour? I see that. She's a great person I'm sure, and everyone's new "it" girl, but not believable in this role (TO ME).

reply

You're imagining things. She was fierce, manipulative and devious, not to mention completely convincing in her part.
That's also the show that got her role in Dark Places, just more proof of how believable she was.


reply

Nope, I'm not imagining things...I'm developing my own opinion based on her acting and my preferences. Glad we can agree to disagree.

reply

When you're talking about squinting and pouting it sounds to me like you have a pretty distorted view.

reply

Chloe has pulled off every role that I've seen her do, so I'm looking forward to seeing her in this movie. I haven't read the book - if that's what you people are talking about - but I've never seen her fail a performance, and that's after having seen more than twelve movies of hers, as well as the numerous guest appearances she's had on TV shows.

reply

I think she's going to do a good job acting as demented as Diondra was. I have faith in her for this role.

reply

SPOILER:

the only thing i don't like about CGM getting cast as Diondra is that she plays a killer IN 90% of her projects: Kick Ass, Hick, Carrie, Let Me In. So I feel like when people who didn't read the book watch the movie they'll jokingly think she's the killer and ruin that shock of an ending when you find out Diondra killed Michelle.

reply

I was actually picturing CGM when I read the book a few months ago. Then I came on here and was shocked to find that she's playing Diondra.

"Seems most IMDb users believe their own opinions are fact and all others' are wrong." ~Me

reply

[deleted]

Chloe is gonna kill it with her performance in this film. She's a brilliant talent, can't wait to see her do her thing.

reply

yea, i can't see it at all. don't get me wrong, CGM is a great actress...she's just too cute to play the Diondra character. that is one crazy bitch! i hope she does pull it off because if she doesn't that might bring the movie down. that is a very important character to the whole vibe of the story.

reply

She's played crazy bitches before (Hit-Girl, Abby in 'Let Me In'). But, granted, if the character is close to the book version, this should be a meaty role for her unlike anything she's done before. This is the movie of her's I'm most anticipating. I think she'll nail it but we'll have to wait to find out.

reply

I think Chloe will do a great job, but when I was reading the book, I kept picturing Liana Liberato, Hailee Steinfeld or Sasha Pieterse as Diondra. But Chloe is hardly unforgivable casting. Charlize Theron on the other hand... As much as I love Charlize Theron and consider her one of the greatest actresses of her generation, shes just so far from Libby physically, her casting just does not make sense at all. Maybe I've just been spoiled with how perfectly cast every single person was in Gone Girl, but unless Charlize pulls off a Monster/North Country level performance, I just won't be able to see past the fact shes about a foot taller than she should be.

I like pigs. Dogs look up to you, cats down on you. Pigs treat you as equals.

reply

She's played crazy bitches before

That's ALL SHE DOES!

This is the movie of her's I'm most anticipating. I think she'll nail it but we'll have to wait to find out.

That's what EVERYBODY *ALWAYS* says when hearing about what movie and what role she's going to be in. I'm sick of it. Quit putting so much stock into this overrated little brat!

reply

...and of course you make an appearance in every thread possible to gripe about her.

reply

You got it, buster.

reply

Because he's a pathetic perverted loser freak

reply

Ah, Explorer. I see you've decided to poke your head around this forum.

reply