I noticed it in the beach scene where Cameron and Lesie start running after her. I couldn't help but notice how toned Cameron looked compared to Kate. Not to mention Kate's body shape is terrible. She has nice boobs though.
I rarely post on people's looks but I have to agree! I didn't know (still don't really) who Kate Upton was, just that I had heard a lot about how "beautiful" she supposedly is. Then I saw her especially in that swimsuit and I was like THAT'S who everyone is talking about?! Doesn't compute.
"If it doesn't make sense, it's not true." -- Judge Judy
Kate Upton has a flabby midsection and really doesn't look that great in a swim suit. And she is so much younger than Cameron Diaz, goes to show even when you're young, excercise is important. Kate needs to work on that waistline!
We know, you're in every thread about the subject that I've come across.
Let's all pretend we wouldn't bang Kate Upton if she let us.
If she "LET US?????"
She has a belly,
AND ZERO curves... AND chicken legs... AND a Hank Hill ass... AND a mustache... AND a derpy, gummy toddler grin with yellow teeth... AND the IQ of a walnut.
she's daughter to some corporate big guys
So you fancy yourself a gold-digging gigolo?
Whatever... I suppose every man has his price.
Me, you couldn't pay me enough to bang this turd...
On second thought, *MAYBE* I'd bang her *IF* she signed over 100% of her claims in Whirlpool Corp. (I'd have to be pretty damn wasted, though).
They say genius skips a generation. Mom's a genius, so I guess I'm a genius too reply share
she has without a doubt the weirdest stomach and the most unattractive not fat stomach I've ever seen, she needs to shed some weight from her stomach and then maybe her stomach wouldn't be as unattractive as it is.
Nah, they're not "disgusting." Clearly, they just didn't know about the new rules. So, for completeness, I'll quote from the Universal Code of Internet Conduct, Section IV, pt. 3:
"If you post disparaging comments about an actor/actresses' body, you are required to post a swimsuit picture of yourself. At that point, the entire planet will vote on your highly-toned, exquisite body. Should the communal verdict be that you look worse than the person you're criticizing, you are immediately banned from posting Ever Again." Addendum: "If the consensus is that you look MUCH worse, you are forbidden from using a computer Ever Again. Our people will be right over to requisition your machine, and smack you into blessed silence."
Endof.
Yer welcome.
"Personally I hope they make all the gods black and change it from Valhalla to Valholla!"
You should not be allowed to post comments online unless your IQ is above 80. That would eliminate all of you retarded Upton apologists!
See, the thing is. . .if this were true, all your posts would disappear, the sun would shine forth brightly, and the heavens would sing. People would be of good cheer, walking down the street arm in arm, singing Kumbaya.
Translation: Kill yourself. Do the universe a favor.
"Personally I hope they make all the gods black and change it from Valhalla to Valholla!" reply share
While I personally disagree with the people criticizing Kate Upton's looks, disagree with the way they express their opinion and feel that debating personal taste is a waste of time by default, I still would like to point out that I also disagree with you.
I hate this "If you can't do it better, do not criticize" line of argumentation. I am an engineer. I build charging systems for electric cars. Can you do that? Probably not. But if you buy a system from my company and it goes up in flames due to bad wiring, I think you have every right to criticize me. Why would this be any different for models who earn money with their looks or musicians who earn money with their music?
And btw:
"If you post disparaging comments about an actor/actresses' body, you are required to post a swimsuit picture of yourself. At that point, the entire planet will vote on your highly-toned, exquisite body. Should the communal verdict be that you look worse than the person you're criticizing, you are immediately banned from posting Ever Again."
How dare you being the voice of reason here!?! Don't you know that this is a place to rant, vent, insult, belittle and devalue while carefully avoiding any exchange of ideas and opinions? So please go away you, you, you level headed, reasonable person and take your sound arguments with you!!
Btw, love your tumblr blog, esp. the Rousey gifs. Wow, she's impressive.
While I personally disagree with the people criticizing Kate Upton's looks, disagree with the way they express their opinion and feel that debating personal taste is a waste of time by default
So you're saying you wouldn't take issue with some idiot who insisted that a Honda Element is a better looking car than an Audi R8? Just because some fetishist finds June Shannon gorgeous doesn't mean VS should start hiring land-whales for their Angels lineup.
And let's not lose sight of the fact that every single magazine that this misshapen turd appears in goes to great lengths to hide/camouflage/morph her body so that she gives the illusion of conforming to well-established standards for attractiveness:
Despite what many of you may want to believe, "beauty" standards (whether for organic or inorganic entities) are very much OBJECTIVE and therefore fair game for debate, "personal taste" be damned.
They say genius skips a generation. Mom's a genius, so I guess I'm a genius too reply share
You are wrong on every level of what you just said. There is nothing in there that would even make sense and I start to think that you are trolling because I refuse to believe anybody could be this dense.
First, although there are objective standards of beauty, they do not mean what you think they mean. The beauty standards that came out of studies show what society, on average, considers beautiful. So if you take an average person of the street and show them a picture of a woman who conforms to those standards and one who does not, they will, with a certain probability, find the one who conforms to those standards more attractive. However, those standards change over time. They always only reflect what is currently going on and they are changing rapidly at the moment. In the 50s a woman like Marylin Monroe was considered perfect in respect to the body. Yet today people in the fashion industry would call her a whale. In the 80s the super thin models were ruling the magazine covers and today models with (slightly) fuller figures are way more popular. Fitness with toned muscles has become more prevalent Who is to say that Kate Upton will not be the basis for your "objective standards" 10 years down the line? And on top of that the standards mean nothing for the individual. Nobody is wrong for having a different ideal.
Second, even if there was a right and wrong in regards to beauty, so what? Perception of beauty happens at the most basic level of the brain. You can not argue with it. You can scream "stranded whale" until you go blue in the face and you will not change the opinion of anybody. What could be more stupid than to engage in a debate where there is absolutely no chance to convince the other person. If somebody thinks June Shannon is gorgeous, I disagree. But I would not try to convince him that he is wrong because it would be pointless. What could I possibly accomplish arguing about it? Should VS hire her for the runway? In my opinion: no. But opinions are like a**holes. Everybody has one, most of them stink and if you are too interested in those of random strangers there is something wrong with you. If VS decided to hire her, I still would not argue. If enough people find her attractive than that is their choice.
And lastly, your whole argument is obviously wrong just based on the evidence from this thread. If there was a real standard that said that Kate Upton is unattractive, she would not be in that role, she would never have been on the VS runway, and you would not find almost half of the people in this thread defending her.
Personally, she is not my type. I think her body is nice but nothing to write home about. Her face is kinda boring with nothing to catch the eye and her mole is very unappealing. But just because I think so does not mean anybody has to agree. It's a sign of incredible arrogance to wish to dictate your taste to others. Look at it from the positive side: All the people who like Kate Upton's looks are removed from the competition for the girls you find attractive.
You are wrong on every level of what you just said.
No I'm not, skippy.
Who is to say that Kate Upton will not be the basis for your "objective standards" 10 years down the line?
Which Kate Upton are we talking about here? The REAL/misshapen one on the left, or the hyper-photoshopped-so-that-she-conforms-to-current-beauty-standards one on the right?:
Perception of beauty happens at the most basic level of the brain. You can not argue with it.
Which Kate Upton are you referring to when making these inane arguments?
(See pics above.)
If somebody thinks June Shannon is gorgeous, I disagree. But I would not try to convince him that he is wrong because it would be pointless. What could I possibly accomplish arguing about it?
But June Shannon isn't fraudulently hogging modeling gigs from other far more [physically] qualified models, is she.
But opinions are like a**holes. Everybody has one, most of them stink and if you are too interested in those of random strangers there is something wrong with you.
That's very cute, coming from someone who just wrote a 560 word reply to my "a**hole" opinions!
If there was a real standard that said that Kate Upton is unattractive, she would not be in that role
(SEE PICS ABOVE!)
and you would not find almost half of the people in this thread defending her.
Which Kate Upton are they defending?
(SEE PICS ABOVE!)
They say genius skips a generation. Mom's a genius, so I guess I'm a genius too reply share
I know you think you make sense and are very smart...but no to both.
I tried to explain to you that there is no point in arguing about taste. Why do you post pictures of her with and without photoshop? If person A thinks she looks great both ways, that is their taste, If person B thinks she looks good photoshopped but bad IRL, that is their taste. If person C thinks she looks good natural but bad when photoshopped, that is their taste. If person D thinks she looks bad in both, that is their taste. So what do your pictures matter?
I try to explain to you that even trying to argue about anybodies attractiveness is wrong by default and your counter is...trying to convince me Kate Upton is unattractive? Why?
You claim I defend Kate Upton. I don't. Never have. It's your opinion that she is unattractive and I could not care less. If somebody thinks she is the most beautiful being ever to grace the earth with her presence...I don't care either. I am not trying to convince you she is beautiful. In fact, I wrote in my last post that I don't think she is anything special. I am trying to explain to you why it is fundamentally stupid to argue about taste.
Btw, this is also not in disagreement with my view about opinions. I do not care about your opinion. Have it. Have fun with it. I care about behavior. And yours is arrogant, offensive, insulting and fundamentally stupid.
If somebody thinks chocolate icecream tastes better than vanilla, that is all right. But if he runs into an icecream parlor and starts screaming at people that they are wrong for ordering vanilla, that chocolate is better and that that is a fact...then you get up and ask him to leave. I am not trying to convince you that vanilla is better. I am telling you to get lost and let people enjoy what they like in piece. I am sure you can get something that is to your taste and enjoy that, too. And if you can only find pleasure by telling other people what to think and insulting others...maybe you need to seek professional help.
I tried to explain to you that there is no point in arguing about taste. Why do you post pictures of her with and without photoshop? If person A thinks she looks great both ways, that is their taste, If person B thinks she looks good photoshopped but bad IRL, that is their taste. If person C thinks she looks good natural but bad when photoshopped, that is their taste. If person D thinks she looks bad in both, that is their taste. So what do your pictures matter?
My pics "matter" in that the ones on the left represent REALITY, the others don't! My pics also "matter" because there are still a whole lot of her fans/supporters/apologists who remain clueless as to just how fug/deformed she looks without tons of photoshop!
You keep coming back to "taste" and "opinion"... Well guess what, it's IS possible for opinions to be flat out WRONG!!!... Especially when those tastes/opinions are based on false info/perceptions (hence why my pics matter!).
(Geez! And you say you're an engineer?!?!? God help us if all engineers share your *beep* reasoning process! )
It's your opinion that she is unattractive and I could not care less.
I do not care about your opinion.
Yep, that's amply evident from the two essays you've posted thus far.
I care about behavior. And yours is arrogant, offensive, insulting and fundamentally stupid.
It is fundamentally stupid to argue about the behavior of random strangers online.
If you are too interested in the behavior of random strangers there is something wrong with you.
If somebody thinks chocolate icecream tastes better than vanilla, that is all right.
But with Upton, her fans are being served tofu and rice cakes dressed up like a parfait, and that is NOT "all right"... Unless of course you think blatant misrepresentation and fraud are "all right."
maybe you need to seek professional help.
Not nearly as much as YOU need an IQ boost of about 50 points or so.
/plonked
They say genius skips a generation. Mom's a genius, so I guess I'm a genius too reply share
But with Upton, her fans are being served tofu and rice cakes dressed up like a parfait, and that is NOT "all right"
If people like tofu and rice cakes dressed up as parfait, then that is indeed alright.
The fact that you are obsessed with telling other people what they personally find attractive is not alright is just a sad commentary on your own lack of intelligence. You telling somebody else they need an IQ boost when you yourself show your stupidity time and time again is hilarious.
Boy, you got me confused with a man who repeats himself- Omar Little
reply share
I really hope most of you realize that if you have BOOBS you're going to have a real body. She has a great body - not gross thin, healthy thin, and you know what? She's going to have a stomach, not perfect abs. Maybe she doesn't want to conform to all of that.
Second, the broad has a really weird case of central obesity: Her body fat distribution (and consequently her waist-to-hip ratio) are WAY off. There's absolutely NOTHING "healthy" about that:
Oh dear, I didn't know my words were going to be picked apart. No, of course I did not mean that women who have a/b/c cups won't have real bodies; I just meant people are used to seeing women with plastic surgery (boobs) with skinny bodies. I just meant her real boobs may come with a real body and with a real body you will have imperfections. THAT is what I meant. Calm down
Bodies come in all shapes and sized and I just think the lot of you are picking apart her body because it is one we haven't really seen before. Her stomach is fine - she may have an odd shape. It is central obesity - that is ridiculous.
You all really have way too much time on your hands.
I agree about her odd shape. I was wondering why Cameron felt so jealous. Sure Cameron's stomach was a bit wrinkly but that isn't necessarily due to age as it is to sun exposure.
But even though, I wouldn't mind Kate's butt even though it's a little wiggly it still looks good. Cameron's is better though. imo
I wouldn't mind having her body, but Cameron Diaz is a lot more toned and fit. In that one picture in the black and purple bikini Kate does not look good at all. She has rolls of fat under her arm, a belly and slouchy posture. That's fine for a normal person but not when you're famous for having this amazing body.
I think she's very cute and appealing, but I can see your point.
uh did you see the third pic? such luscious tits, her boobs are huge and her boobs are to die for! how can you not love her when you see her amazing boobs?
My definition of a REAL body entails there will be imperfections since you all are making assumptions and then freaking out on something I didn't say...
It is staggering how many people are picking her apart. She's 21, still growing, and leave the woman alone. It isn't healthy being this cruel toward a woman's body.
I disagree, she has clearly entered this film for a role which requires her to be "very attractive and have a sexy body" if that is the role description perhaps she should of worked harder on that. I am sure you women would be speaking up if tom cruise stripped off his top playing a hunk and had no muscles and a huge beer belly. Same principle here.
I disagree, she has clearly entered this film for a role which requires her to be "very attractive and have a sexy body" if that is the role description perhaps she should of worked harder on that
Exactly, YOUR definition. I think she looked like a real person who would STILL attract many men. The fake women you are referring to are very rare and probably wouldn't even go for this guy. Unless they were gold diggers which her character was not.
Always be yourself... Unless you can be Batcatt
reply share
I read the threads and looked at the photos and I agree that in a swimsuit she does not look great. She doesn't look horrible thought. Losing weight probably would not help her--she does not have a a great natural figure. According to stats online she was born in 1992 and that would make her 24. IMO she doesn't look great for her age. There are many women in their early twenties that are younger and better looking. I didn't see the movie--may go see it today but she looks 10-20 years older than that in the photos.
Lol huh? She's only 24! You speak like she's now an old lady or something. Objectively (as in I don't know two sh*ts about her so I'm not a fan or a hater), she doesn't have an ideal shape (by traditional standards). I think the photos that one poster keeps posting, especially the side by side with Katy Perry, are very damning and really show how out of shape this Upton lady is.
I liken this Upton hoopla to the Julia Roberts phenomenon. Mainstream media kept pushing her as a great "beauty" and people in my area were truly perplexed. We just didn't know what the hell they were talking about! lol We were like Say What again? That remains a truly confusing phenomenon for me. Just strange some of the people the media decide to hype up.
"If it doesn't make sense, it's not true." -- Judge Judy
she doesn't have an ideal shape (by traditional standards). I think the photos that one poster keeps posting, especially the side by side with Katy Perry, are very damning and really show how out of shape this Upton lady is.
Some might say it's not really fair to use a specimen like Perry for comparison... But then, Upton's the one passing herself off as a "model," not Perry. (Perry's also 8 years older, you'll note.)
ETA: Well, it looks like the pro-Upton mods deleted yet another vs. Perry thread. (Man, that Whirlpool Corp. payola fund sure runs deep!)
Isn't it interesting they deleted a thread that doesn't violate any TOS rules whereas they choose to keep one up that features blatant nudity:
I liken this Upton hoopla to the Julia Roberts phenomenon. Mainstream media kept pushing her as a great "beauty" and people in my area were truly perplexed.
I suppose it's part the intrigue... That this many sheeple can so easily be brainwashed into chomping on tofu and thinking it's tenderloin.
Funny thing is, if this broad weren't famous and these same sheeple saw her walking on the beach they'd be saying the same things I am.
They say genius skips a generation. Mom's a genius, so I guess I'm a genius too reply share
I've met Katy Perry a couple of times; I've never met Kate Upton because she doesn't allow it (too stuck up), but I've been within a few feet of her. And I must write that Katy is infinitely more sexy-- inside and out.