MovieChat Forums > Wicked Little Letters (2024) Discussion > Another 'Diverse' Historical Film

Another 'Diverse' Historical Film


I don't get it.

Is pretending that Britain was always a multicultural, multiracial society meant to make everyone embrace it today or something?

What's the thinking here? What are they doing? Why?

Can't we embrace multiculturalism whilst simultaneously acknowledging that this isn't how things were in the 1920s?

reply

I couldn't agree more.The casting of black actors as people who were white in real life was the only thing wrong with the film for me; it was hilarious.
Spoiler -I suspect that jail was an improvement on Edith's life with her father!

reply

I agree. Were there black judges then?

reply

There were people of color in England back then!

reply

Of course there were, but very few and they were living on the margins of society. There were no Indian policewomen in the 1920s. The first white policewoman only appeared in 1915.

reply

It's not a documentary. Just reinterpreting the past to make it more relatable to modern audiences.

reply

Relatable to what? The demographic in question hardly watches these type of films and really doesn’t care who is in the cast. So staying historically correct isn’t wrong.

reply

Just reinterpreting the past to make it more relatable to modern audiences.


It's more like they're shit scared of being accused of racism by having an all white cast.

reply

🤣

reply

Yeah, i like to call this type of casting “Minorities in inexplicable places”.

Please keep fantasy in fantasy films.

reply

Why do you focus in on that? Even back in Shakespeare’s day, men would play women and pasty British white guys got to play Othello.

I watched a talented group of actors tell an interesting story. I like the movement against typecasting. It allows talent to rise and actors to develop their craft. I am a big fan of community theater where ensembles of diverse actors put on great plays. It’s impressive to see actors show such range.

reply

Even back in Shakespeare’s day, men would play women and pasty British white guys got to play Othello


A pasty British white guy wrote Othello, so it's not a big deal.

reply

I especially hated that they changed Rose from English to Irish. England = bad, Ireland= good.

reply


How does Rose , whoever she is, being changed from an English person to an Irish person equate to
"England = bad, Ireland= good." ??

They changed the olympics this year, France are hosting it instead of like 2012 when England did.
Does that mean the olympics hate England?

reply

That's exactly why they made that change.

Good lord, that Olympics analogy is a typical bokers example from our equally bonkers resident troll.🍆

reply


1920 in Littlehampton, and it's totally and utterly woked out to fuck. Wokery garbage right from the off, and I knew this would be the case with it when I saw FILM 4 in the opening credits.





Deckard B26354, I'm filed and monitored, and I retire wokies.

reply

I love colourblind casting mainly because of how it triggers snowflakes like you.

reply


LMAO, is that your best! Troll off cockhead.

reply

Arbogast just loves black cock.

Our resident troll is a moron. Even with dozens of sock puppets he still fails at his purpose.

reply

I like it better when they do multicultural casting in a setting where it makes sense. It doesn't sound like it in this situation. What makes it particularly annoying, is they put black people in positions of power or wealth (in a time when nobody would have given them the time of day), and have them take up half the cast, when in fact for a very long time, they were in the minority in England and were often poor.

reply