Nihlistic letdown


After all the drama, courage, resilience of the main characters, we are left with a final scene where our two survivors venture out into a vast world. And they are promptly eaten alive by a polar bear. What kind of reward has the writer given its audience?

reply

Actually, facts don't care about your feelings.

reply

The facts made me very sad. Ed Harris should not have released them into the wild at that point.

reply

Agreed

reply

Did I miss something? Who says the survivors were eaten by a polar bear? I don't remember that at all.

reply

If it's brown lay down, if it's black fight back, if it's white say goodnight.

reply

Big ass polar bear on the hill and 2 fresh humans to eat.

reply

Nature, red in tooth and claw
--Tennyson

The natural world can be unfeeling. Perhaps the writer was aiming for reality more than uplift.

reply

The reward of FREEDOM?! What's nihilistic is actually your take on the ending.

reply

Ed Harris should have let them off somewhere warmer so they would have at least had a chance at survival.

reply

I thought the whole premise was that the whole earth was frozen. Not sure how much warmer it could've been.

reply

It gets warmer at the equator. Don't even know why the train didn't go there.

reply


The significance of that scene was to show that there was life on Earth, not that the only survivors were eaten.


reply

Not for long if you let them out in the arctic like he just did.

reply

The writer has rewarded you a short sharp shock about how life works

reply

They should have used the perpetual motion machine to heat the earth instead of circling it indefinitley

reply