I like superhero movies; I like high-school dramas. I'm down with the found footage technique, though I think it's over-rated. I watched this film with a friend who has similar tastes. We kept cringing, and around the beer pong scene, were actually curling up on the couch in physical suffering over how much this movie sucked. I really feel like I'm close enough to the target demographic...although apparently I'm just getting out of touch.
It's like the screenwriters designed the characters--emo loser, philosophical type, and popular jock--and then hired whoever wrote the MTV remake of Skins to write all three of them. All three characters talked the same way, all the time. Matt's character in particular was the mostly poorly written "philosophical type" I've ever seen in a High School movie; he had no insights and could rarely form an articulate sentence. Andrew's character arc had some promise; his home life was genuinely disturbing, but having it end with him hurling school buses and patrol cars through the air was the ultimate cop-out to generic action, strangely anti-climactic amidst all of the effects.
In-as-much as the movie has a "message," it seems to be that if you're an abused, disturbed teenager, letting out your anger by killing hundreds of people doesn't make you a bad person because after all, you're an abused and disturbed teenager. Imagine this: a movie about one of the Columbine killers which ends with one of their friends in Tibet saying, "you're not a bad person. I'll do better. I'll help people..." Of course he's a bad person, and so is Andrew. The script is so under-baked when it comes to morality and motivation that it rams down our throats the idea that Andrew's actions are somehow inevitable and more his friends fault than his own, since they didn't love him in the way that he wanted.
Two scenes I liked: playing at the store with their powers (the shopping cart, etc.), and when Andrew beats up the bullies, there's a the moment when he's twirling their inert bodes, possible their corpses, around on the pavement, almost using their hair as paintbrushes to smear the blood on the street. Now THAT was compelling sh-t, most disturbing image in the movie by far.
I dunno...I guess the point of this post is to ask a simple question: Did anyone else just really basically hate the movie, mostly because of how annoying and one dimensional the characters were? Or am I just completely missing something?
Yes. I agree this is probably one of the worst movies i have ever watched. the whole thing was a giant cluster F*(K! gave it one star. and yes i did watch, really wanted to like it, but it was just bad. bad acting, bad story...just not. I lost faith about imdb scores a long time ago. people gave the us version of girl with dragon tattoo an 8. ugh. just no.
I wanted to like it too but there were just too many incredibly stupid things on screen that were taking me out of it. This movie had inconsistent everything all the way into the end! AARRGH!!! EFF THIS MOVIE!!!
I am so glad to see this thread. Because I HATED HATED HATED this movie. I mean, it was ridiculous. Yet, Roger Ebert gave it 3 1/2 stars and it has a 7.1 on IMDb. I'm like, Wha??? Have I fallen into an alternate universe where bad is good, Like a Mirror, Darkly?
It got so few bad reviews, it's simply shocking. I think the filmmakers successfully included some kind of voodoo mojo to trick the audience or something. I was able to find one review that mostly summed it up for me, though: http://www.fatguysatthemovies.com/2012/02/fat-guy-5-five-reasons-why-c hronicle-sucks-ass/.
"5. The Whole Found Footage Thing Is Getting Old
I know it’s an economic boon for Hollywood to produce (or cheaply acquire) films shot on a shoestring budget rather than hundreds of millions of dollars. And yes, The Blair Witch Project, [REC] and the Paranormal Activity movies were neat. But the format has severe limitations. From each film starting with a rumbling camera and someone saying the equivalent of “Is we on?” or “I’m going to shoot everything” to the capturing of inane, improvised dialogue, this format only works as a novelty. And considering that Chronicle had to remind the audience every five minutes that it was recording, as well as making wild plot excuses to justify it, the getting-old format got even more old.
4. Terrible Visual Effects
The superhero movie has become the gold standard for visual effects. Unfortunately, the people who made Chronicle didn’t get that memo. The found footage format is supposed to make things look more real, and that works in films like (the beginning of) District 9. However, Chronicle was full of terrible and fuzzy green screen work, harnesses under coats, goofy CGI Pringles and juggling that looked worse than Naomi Watts’ vaudeville shtick in King Kong
3. Everyone in the Movie is an *beep*
From the clueless jock Steve to the bland Matt to the would-be psychopath in Andrew, every character in this movie was an *beep* And dealing with the burden of bullies at school and an abusive father doesn’t excuse any of this. Self-centered, narcissistic teenagers may be a common thing, but we don’t like to see movies about them.
2. Terrible Storytelling
For as much praise as Chronicle is getting for its “realistic” found footage presentation, the plot often makes no realistic sense. You have eighteen-year-old kids who don’t know the definition of “telekinesis” (which is as silly as them not knowing what a Tyrannosaurs rex is). There’s a smoking hot female blogger who (surprise, surprise!) also videotapes everything, stuck in the story for no other reason than to get reverse angles and pad the plot out. Let’s not get into the minutia of air pressure and the dangers of flying without an oxygen mask 20,000 feet in the air. Let’s talk about the floating camera at the funeral scene that not a damn person notices.
1. Wildly Unrealistic Characters
It’s not unrealistic to expect these characters to use their new-found powers for personal gain. It is unrealistic, however, for them to not once consider the pop culture ideas that come along with them. We were all teenage boys, and if we got telekinesis and the ability to fly, we’d at least mention Superman, or maybe The Force. We understand how the jock might not think of this, but the loner nerd who plays video games certainly would. These aren’t realistic eighteen-year-old boys. They’re poorly built, two-dimensional idiots that are out of place even in a comic book."
And I added the following comment:
I know I'm late, but just watched this on demand. To preface my thoughts, I originally wanted to see the film in the theaters but caught wind of lukewarm reviews and decided against it. Then my 15-year old daughter tried watching it as we flew overseas. She told me it wasn't good.
So I wasn't in a big hurry to say the least. But I did decide to catch it On Demand to satisfy my curiosity (as a sci-fi and x-men lover).
What my daughter didn't tell me is how God awful it was. As far as I am concerned, this is almost SyFy/Asylum bad. I was really surprised at how horrible and neverending this 80 minute film was. Even more shocking - the pretty good reviews among critics and fans alike. Maybe, just maybe watching it in the theater gave audiences a false sense of entertainment value. I dunno.
But I’d like to add two more reasons to your five.
6. The characters are idiots.
I’m sorry, but if I had telekinesis, I could come up with a number of successful, stealthy, and non-lethal ways to steal $50 (OR MORE) in order to save my mother’s life. And those ways would not involve at least a couple of hours wasted finding and putting on a stupid firefighter getup.
And…if I had the ability to fly and had previously used that ability quite often – the last thing I would ask my girlfriend during a major, major emergency situation, is for the keys to her car.
And I literally could barely take the fact that dozens of police officers on foot, in cars, and in the air, who are getting killed or maimed left and right, didn’t fire a single shot and kept approaching in waves like mindless video game minions. Over and over and over.
7. The acting is atrocious.
Sometimes badly written dialogue can still come across as believable in the hands of a talented actor. I mean, it happens all of the time. But this was literally like a daytime soap opera with Degrassi-high characters and a Super 8 setting. And the over the top dramatics were relentless, literally 80 minutes of BAD acting without any breaks. "OMG you're my BFF, bro, I love you man!"
AND...someone had made a good argument about regarding the film based on the fact that it's a bunch of first-timers on a $15M budget.
Low budget doesn't mean you get a pass. Moon (2009) was both a debut AND only cost $5M to make. This film is ten thousand times better than Chronicle and had a third the budget.
I don't *hate* bad films normally, I mean not all films can be good. But I do hate it when a bad film is being passed off as good like this one OR when the filmmakers simply knew better and had all of the resources in the world yet dropped the ball (The Last Airbender).
And guess what? The Terminator cost $6.5M to make in early 80s money. Which according to the inflation calculator is $13.6M in 2011 dollars.
What about Napoleon Dynamite? It cost less than a million and had mostly unknown/new actors.
I actually enjoy watching really bad movies that are recognized as such - and have come to realize that all of the worst movies are the result of unchecked egos combined with a lack of talent (morons with money, if you will). The project advocates insist on directing, writing and even starring in their abominations. With a $15M budget which really is more than plenty, why didn't the creators of Chronicle hire someone good to improve on their story and dialogue? Writers are literally a dime a dozen (and I say that as a writer). If the characters and everything else had been the real deal, I think that most people would have easily forgiven any of the special effects cheapness.
So much truth. I can't believe they had 15million on this movie! Where the hell did all that money go!? I still can't believe this is John Landis' kid. That hurts so much.
Excellent response queenshan....completely agree...especially with the writing. I can sum this movie up in 2 words: "Andrew stop!" In fact, I think that was the only think spoken the last 20 minutes of the movie...until the sappy "I love you, man" ending. It scares me that the narcissism in this film is a reflection of our modern society....and it scares me more that so many viewers empathize with Andrew. Imagine what a different film could have been made if they spent a little less time with the Jacka** pranks and maybe had Andrew attempt to heal his mother with his new found powers -- if he can pull out teeth...couldn't he at least ease her pain? Or was he just too damn selfish and self-centered?
You are not alone and you obviously didn't miss anything. I gave it a 5/10 because I really didn't HATE this film, but I'll never need to watch it again. The movie is a mess.
Not at all alone. It just felt like a cheap movie. The style of filming and the way it looked like the kids were hanging from cables, minus the cables. The flying and floating bits were really poorly done.
If your nose runs and your feet smell, you were built upside down.
((this is longer than I wanted but w.e. w.e, I urge you to skip it. My general rating is 1/10))
what in the world? 'emoloverboy' (what a mature handle) why are you so hung up on defending this? NOBODY is trolling, they are people's OPINIONS. The database has nothing against any sort of critique, no body is damn trolling jesus.
The post is about dislike of the movie, you are stating your feelings towards it, you are not leaving any valid points as to why the movie is good or bad and honestly, you are about as irritating as the movie. --
haha WHY buy a camera for a couple hundred when your mom needs the money, seriously. seriously. oh btw, he was always mad at his friends when they were trying to be there for him. If they really didnt give a sh*t they wouldnt be there in the first place.
Anyways, they were young like the majority watching this movie, feeling amazed by it. I really would have liked to see more understanding of what and how and why their powers were the way they were. How they seemed linked and the nose bleeds.. I didnt expect Matt to be the last surviving one either..
-Far as the acting goes, they all played the characters they were meant to play, nothing more, nothing less. It wasnt meant to have stellar performances, just enough to tell whatever message they wanted to convey out there. It was like a sci fi project x if anything idk
-I also wouldve liked the movie to be filmed regularly, I know it added to the story and I'm sure everyone has their own ideas of how they might make the movie, but personally, I think it might have been taken more seriously.. then again, they were trying to use cinematography in a different way and I can respect that.
I feel like alot of people were probably like "okay whos holding the camera now?"
"bengrimms" is spot on about a good amount of the crowd watching this film and being captured by it
// unfortunately this movie conveys a sad reality about what someone might do with powers if they suddenly had them. Where they are no way prepared for it, let alone whatever responsibility might come with it.
I did find it cheesy and I very much ignored the link between akira and this. Akira was different and I can see where someone might come to that point but I had to ignore it.. but its on something I just said about gaining powers that we as humans might fascinate over but never know what to do if we actually have it.
And as realistic as they wanted to make this movie, I found it laughable in so many moments because how unrealistic it seemed to me. I was waiting for it to be over and give me some kindof insight but most of it seemed filmed like a college riot and I couldnt get much out of that really, other than the obvious.
Comment on a scene: That part where Andrew talks to the camera, trying out at philosophy about crushing a bug and feeling nothing and for hollywood purposes, crushes the car while glaring at you? So comedic, I could not stop laughing.. loll (most of the movie seemed like an action/comedy to me with a "teen adult" element).
and I know this is just my personal opinion, but I never thought telekinesis was such a great power to have.. one of the lesser to choose from.. and most people when asked about "powers" they'd love to have, you rarely get the answer of telekinesis. It has its advantages but I feel like I could easily do without it..
And no you are not alone, I had a good chunk of friends telling me how agitating they found it to be.
Andrew was the precursor to a megalomaniacal super villain.. he was obviously aware of his presence on video and that's why he did silly *beep* like monologuing and crushing a car to demonstrate his power
I'm not sure you're supposed to like the guy.. you might feel sorry for him in the beginning, but its clear he's too far gone to give anyone else in the world a chance. He lashes out at those who clearly love him.. He's basically a POS by the end of it, but that doesn't make the move less enjoyable..
Unless one felt tricked.. betrayed, thought they were supposed to like him, and couldn't reconcile it?
"We kept cringing, and around the beer pong scene, were actually curling up on the couch in physical suffering over how much this movie sucked."
Exaggerate much?
The movie isn't bad at all. It might not be your thing, but apparently quite a few people liked it or it wouldn't be rated so high on movie sites.
I'm not really sure what you mean by the "message" in the movie. I don't even see a clear message. To me, it's just an entertaining movie. Did Spaceballs have a "message"? What about Jurassic Park? Don't clone dinosaurs? It's all perception from the viewer. You can perceive the movie however you'd like to, but it doesn't mean everyone perceives it the same way or that it was even intended to be that way by the director/producer.
"It's hard to say no to Yoo-Hoo. The name literally beckons."