So you are now against organ donation, but you said, after seeing the film, that nothing could drive you further TO A YES on your driver's license. Well, which is it? Are you now against it, or are you being driven further to a YES on your license?
Yes, I realize you meant that nothing could drive your further FROM, not TO, a YES on your license, but I couldn't resist. LOL.
On a serious note, I think it's a little odd that you would allow a fictitious film to change your outlook on saving someone's life. Or, even many people's lives. It's not like you are going to need the organs when you are dead. When you are dead, you are nothing more than a slab of meat anyway, so why not let someone have life? If you are an atheist, like myself, then why would you care what organs you are missing while laying in the ground, rotting? If you are a religious person, do you think JC or Allah or Buddha or the six armed Indian dude would want you to be so superficially selfish?
I know that my opinion isn't going to change yours, but I still think it's a little odd that a fictional film would change a decision like this. Besides, what the people are doing in the film isn't voluntary...what we do is.
If the plural of mouse is mice, and the plural of goose is geese, why is the plural of moose not meese?
reply
share