MovieChat Forums > Wicked: Part I (2024) Discussion > How does the far-right reconcile the fil...

How does the far-right reconcile the film's tremendous critical and commercial success?


The highest-grossing musical-film adaptation of all time. 88% critical approval rating at RT.

I thought it was a surefire bomb, though? "Go woke go broke", eh?

reply

Why don't you define what YOU mean by "far-right"?

reply

Isn't that the trick the left gets accused of playing? "Define woke." "Define liberal."

How about going against the far-right grain and giving an honest answer?

reply

I could if I knew whether I was far-right or not.

reply

Anything right of Marx/Lenin/Mao is "far-right" according to the left.

THey'll eat their own of they aren't left enough.

reply

What is woke about this movie? I haven't seen it.

reply

Recasting the Wicked Witch of the West as just some poor misunderstood POC while the "Good Witch" is just some mean popular White Girl.

reply

[deleted]

What is your question? Who are the people you think need to reconcile something? A film version of one of the most successful musicals of all time did decent box office numbers.

One might expect this film to top a billion at the box office, but $700 million is still a good haul. Is it because the film is pushing a woke agenda that it underperformed? Maybe. Or maybe that's just the state of theaters in 2024.

Mostly it seems you've constructed a straw man to berate.

reply

Bullshit! If this movie bombed that would be posted all over this board. See go woke go broke! Now that it didn't not a damn word is said. Get the fuck out of here with your nonsense.

reply

It may "seem" that way to you if you haven't seen, or pretend not to have seen, the constant far-right attacks on this movie across social media.

And I'm not sure how it "underperformed", when its gross is sitting at $700 mil (almost five times its budget).

reply

I'm on social media, specifically film-related social media, regularly, and have seen no attacks on Wicked from the far right, or anyone else. I'm not saying it isn't out there on the fringes somewhere. You can find just about anything if you look hard enough.

I feel like the studio left a lot of money on the table by sending Wicked to streaming after only 39 days in theaters. In the past they used to wait 90 days to do that, and lately even 60 days is considered a quick turnaround, so for a film that was doing the numbers Wicked was doing, it seemed like a mistake. The fact that it has still eked out another $50 million since it hit streaming platform reinforces this belief.

reply

This is a "social media" site, moron. I see five far-right troll attacks on this title page!

reply

This is a pretty fringe site. In addition to those of us here to talk about films, the site attracts people like you who come to espouse fringe politics, and berate other users. Using this site as a bellweather for social media is going to offer flawed conclusions.

reply

Are there any bigger post-IMDb sites than this one? I like moviechat just fine, but if I can get even more engagement elsewhere, that’d be appreciated.

reply

This site isn't very good in terms of fostering discussion between movie-lovers, but I don't know of anything better. It seems like at least half the discussions here, if not far more, are pointless back-and-forth political arguments from the same handful of users. What discussion of film that does take place tends to only be about very recent or very well-known films, and rarely is it more than "I loved it"or "I hated it" or "rank your favorites."

Twitter has a solid film community, but the nature of the site prevents much in the way of long-form discussion.

Reddit is the worst of them all.

If there is a site where people interact in a friendly manner and engage in intelligent discussion of film, I don't know about it. Maybe someone should create an invite-only Discord channel for a handful of film-lovers?

reply

moving the goal post, are you?

reply

What goal post? Or are you just throwing out a generic reply you see people make a lot online?

reply

Box office goal post. It's a hit no matter how you slice it.

reply

That's what I've said all along. It was a very successful film.

reply

They don't reconcile. Like a conspiracy theorist they do one of two things. A they ignore it, heads hung low and just move onto the next target, or B they will change the definition so that this doesn't fit the narrative. In other words move the goal post. These incels I have nothing but contempt for. They are human garbage.

reply

Leftists are the masters of changing the definitions of words. They're also the masters of projection.

reply

Really? Ok so then define woke for me. Give me the actual definition.

reply

I don't care because I know there's only one Wizard of Oz.

reply

Frank Baum has 170 writer credits! Let us know how book adaptations you find. https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000875/

reply

Who cares what the far right think about it? Or the left.

I miss the 90s when you could enjoy and discuss a film without turning it into a political football.

reply

I haven’t seen any far-right boogeymen attack this movie.

I have seen normal people criticize the lead actress for overreacting to a fan-made poster, especially when the fan poster improved the movie’s version where she had dead eyes.

reply