Way better than the original
I was surprised
shareYeah, it’s overall better than the original, but the first one had better side characters like Philip Seymour Hoffman
shareThis movie gave me wind.
shareNo the first was a lot better I have seen it many times being a 90s kid.
I saw this one last night in Clacton cinema it was ok though I gave it a 7/10
This ones good, I felt the first was better. Paxton and Hunt were both more engaging actors and the tornados themselves produced far more striking imagery than this one. That said, this is thrilling in its own right
If anyone's interested, I reviewed the movie on my youtube channel. Appreciate any feedback. Trying to improve -
https://youtu.be/5zZbDSgfmsU
No it isn’t. Wizard of Oz tornado was better. Love story is ridiculous. Scientific stuff is laughable. But, after all, it comes down to the tornado - a class F5 or F6. Visually that didn’t happen. First movie done years ago was better. I did like the music.
shareNo. Original was better. This is nothing but a cash grab.
shareI can't identify with a single character in this one. But I am sure that gen z with its lack of education and orientation in life prefers this one... 🤔
shareYeah I'd say so.
The original was decent but this took the premise and utilized superior modern filmmaking standards. It's faster paced with better photography. The actors were better too, Glen Powell and Daisy-Edgar Jones are talented.
So Bill Paxton and Philip Seymour Hoffman are chop liver to you.
shareNah, The entire time i was watching this. I was wishing i watching the original. The Characters where a lot more bland and the plot was super predictable. Even the Storm Visual Effects weren't as good. I don't think i saw single piece of debris the entire movie. Except when the bus hit that swimming pool.
share💯
share