MovieChat Forums > Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga (2024) Discussion > ‘Furiosa’ Inches Out ‘Garfield’ With $32...

‘Furiosa’ Inches Out ‘Garfield’ With $32M But No. 1 Race Still Close In Dullest Memorial Day Weekend


‘Furiosa’ Sees $3.5M In Previews As Memorial Day Weekend Box Office Begins
https://deadline.com/2024/05/box-office-furiosa-garfield-memorial-day-1235938017/

Friday AM: Warner Bros’ Geroge Miller prequel Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga did $3.5M at 3,400 locations that began previews at 3PM.

2015’s Max Max Fury Road posted previews of $3.7M back in May 2015 off showtimes that began at 7PM and went on to open to $45.4M, No. 2 that weekend. The movie legged out to a 3.3x multiple.

reply

FRIDAY PM: Ouch, it’s looking really bad. Warner Bros.’ Furiosa is possibly posting the lowest opening for a Memorial Day movie in 41 years with a 4-day between $31M-$35M. How the holy heck is that? If the George Miller-directed prequel comes in on the low end, the last time a No. 1 movie or Memorial Day opening title filed a 4-day gross take that was lower was back in 1983, when Return of the Jedi made $30.5M — and that was a lot of money back then.

Furiosa is seeing an estimated $11M for today (including previews) and around $27.5M for the 3-day at 3,804 theaters, and that includes Imax.

reply

‘Furiosa’ Up In Smoke With $31M-$33M, Possibly Lowest Memorial Day Opening In 41 Years, Might Get Clawed By ‘Garfield’

SATURDAY AM: This weekend at the Memorial Day box office, the film industry seems to be questioning its existence, ready to jump out of a window. How can a genius George Miller directed tentpole prequel with great reviews, 4 1/2 stars PostTrak exits to the multi-Oscar winning Mad Max: Fury Road not be working? The entire theatrical business is destined for streaming, oh, no! People will forever stay on their couches!

Furiosa is still on track to be the lowest Memorial Day opening in 41 years (at the high end), with a four-day between $31M-33M. And as we told you in our summer preview, Alcon/Sony’s Garfield could beat her with a similar 4-day haul. As great as anyone (including myself) might think Furiosa is, Mad Max is finite fanboy property, R-rated at that, and he’s always been. Ya know how many 13-17 year olds went to Furiosa yesterday? 2% per PostTrak. That’s a big boy quad that’s missing. Do you know how many women went yesterday? 29%. Adults over 55? 9%. Mad Max and Furiosa aren’t everyone movies.

reply

Now Hollyweird can stop pretending Anya Taylor Joy is a bankable star.

reply

She's not bad in what I've seen her in.

reply

On a budget of $168 millions

You know I was surprised when they announced spin-off back then. As people were disappointment and annoyed that movie pushed Mad Max to be supporting character in his own movie and made Furiosa lead. But movie was gorgeous and stunning visually and Charlize Theron was ok, so they eat that up.

And for some reason Hollywood decided that everyone liked Furiosa so much that they care about her origin story. Now those producers can see that no one cared. Not to mention other actress is playing.

Mad Max, apart from stunning visuals, has a STORY. They had to escape and were moving to place. It was a chase movie. It had Tom Hardy in his prime, Charlize Theron and Nickolas Hoult.

This movie has only c-lister tv actress Anya Taylor-Joy no one cares about. And movies premise is - young Furiosa looking sad and bored, and some generic bad guy. No wonder no one cared.

Real movie stars got old and cant carry a movie anymore. And all those new faces that Hollywood tries to make happen is not working. How many flops and lost money before Hollywood producers will understand that Austin Butler, Jacob Elordi, Paul Mescal, Glen Powell, Florence Pugh, Jenna Ortega, Sydney Sweeney, Anya Taylor-Joy, Zendaya are not movie stars. They can have occasional hit when it's part of franchise like Scream, Marvel or about Elvis. Or one low budget rom-com. But it doesn't mean they can carry and open 150 millions movie.

Imagine there were producers who thought that Anya Taylor-Joy can make 200 millions for their movie. When original Furiosa was Charlize Theron. Who people actually know. That Twisters movie with Glen Powell will probably flop too with some 40 millions opening. On a budget of 200 millions. And zero stars.

reply

Yeah 168 million is a lot of money like this movie isn't Barbie it's nowhere near as popular. In comparison Road Warrior and Thunder Dome cost 4 million and 10 million to make.
Shoe string budgets compared to 168 million for Furiosa. They're spending way to much money on these movies 310 million for Gladiator 2 really? I not sure if Gladiator 2 will be good or bad ,but 310 million is a bit excessive. Spending 200 million on twister is also a lot in comparison another tornado film called Into the Storm which came out 10 years ago cost 50 million to make ,and of course there's the Joker 2 which also cost 200 million to make when the first film cost like 55 million to make. I could see maybe twisters doing well overseas ,but the other movies I'm not sure about.

reply

Oh dear. I didn't know they spend 300 millions on Gladiator 2. Hollywood is going into bankruptcy.

How long before studios can't afford to lose 200 millions on movie few times a year. Before it was like - they can have big flop there and there. But some Titanic or Lord of the Rings juggernaut will come and make money to cover loses.

Now they have nothing. Only huge flops and loses with no juggernaut to over loses.

And they still pay those crazy salaries to actors. When none of them can carry movie and bring viewers on their name. I'm sure they payed like 20 millions to Denzel, 10 to Paul Mescal, 10 to Pedro Pascal, 15 to Ridley Scott. And then movie will open to 40-50 millions and end with 150.

reply

We know you hate hot, successful women. Just proves you are a bitter Incel!

reply

You talking to me or the other person? I don’t have any beef with the actress I haven’t really seen any of her movies.

I’m just saying that there spending too much money on a lot of movies and that a lot of them are too expensive. For example Gladiator 2 costing 310 million and Joker 2 costing 200 million.

reply

LOL. It's always nice to see 30 years old man-boys from moms basement, obsessed with boobs.

It's like - why on earth would I be specifically obsessed and bow in submission to "hot women"? I’m not 15 years old nerd acne boy from high school.

I don't bow to anyone and generally despise all Hollywood narcissist freaks. Who think they are so special and above all.

reply

Real movie stars got old and cant carry a movie anymore. And all those new faces that Hollywood tries to make happen is not working.


Wrong. There are no movie stars anymore at least 15 years ago! Do you know how many bombs those old movie stars made? Ever heard of Babylon? Black Adam? The Mummy? Do you think what made Top Gun 2 a hit was because Tom Cruise? No, The reason was F-18 and F-14.

reply

Well we sure as hell ain't getting a belated sequel to Dredd now!

This film was always an odd choice to tentpole for Memorial Day Weekend. The genre is very niche.

reply

A sequel to Dredd probably would've made more than Furiosa 😄

reply

Would have cost half as much to make too.

reply

‘Garfield’ In Dead Heat With ‘Furiosa’ At Weakened Memorial Day Weekend Box Office
https://deadline.com/2024/05/box-office-garfield-furiosa-1235941424/

SUNDAY AM UPDATE: The 4-day fight between Warner Bros‘ Furiosa and Alcon/Sony‘s The Garfield Movie will drag out into Monday, both titles currently in a dead heat, eyeing $31M over 4-days, $25M over 3-days.

There are those showing the 48-year old comic strip feline eating the one-armed desert renegade’s lunch with $31M to $30.96M, but it’s too close to call right now. In regards to Garfield upsetting Furiosa, we told you this was in the cards.

Whether Garfield or Furiosa wins, it will be the lowest opening for a Memorial Day weekend No. 1 title in 29 years, the last being 1995’s Casper at $22M.

After beating Furiosa on Saturday, $8.3M to $8M, Garfield looks to have the edge over it on Sunday and Monday. Garfield is booked at 4,035 boosted by some PLFS. Furiosa is in play at 3,804 juiced by 400 Imax auditoriums, Dolby, 4DX, D-box, etc.

reply

Furiosa had a much bigger drop off over the weekend:
Fri: 10.3M
Sat: 8.3M -20%
Sun: 7M -15%

Garfield had a much smaller drop off:
Fri: 8.5M
Sat: 8.2M
Sun: 8.2M

reply

MONDAY AM: Warner Bros.’ Furiosa had an edge over The Garfield Movie on Sunday, $7.6M to $7.4M, which is putting her ahead on the four-day estimates of the orange cat, $32M to $31.1M.

Everyone who thinks that this past Memorial Day weekend was some sort of doomsday at the box office has to get a grip as it all boils down to product: Female-led action movies, outside of franchise pics Captain Marvel and Wonder Woman, have always been challenged as a sub-genre at the box office, and Furiosa‘s 3-day ($26.3M) and 4-day are in the realm of such pics as the 2018 Alicia Vikander Tomb Raider ($23.6M 3-day), and even 2019’s Alita ($28.5M 3-day, $37.2M 4-day). Hope for a better summer resides in the first day presales for Disney/Marvel Studios’ Deadpool and Wolverine which are the best for an R-rated movie at $8M+; that Shawn Levy directed threequel opening on July 26.

reply