Why do all of these major sci-fi/fantasy franchises ALWAYS have to have a PREQUEL series??
Surely, with the examples of Star Wars, LOTR and HP, we ALL KNOW THEY FUCKING SUCK!!
So WHY BOTHER???
Surely, with the examples of Star Wars, LOTR and HP, we ALL KNOW THEY FUCKING SUCK!!
So WHY BOTHER???
Short answer is "money" and "ratings". It's a great time to be a television viewer right now because there's so many different shows to choose from. There's tons of competition going on right now.
Personally, I prefer movies over TV shows but occasionally you'll come across one that's quite special like Game of Thrones. We'll see if this HOTD series is any good but that's another reason why we're seeing them, they're riding the coattails of the success GoT, LOTR, SW and trying to increase their number of subscribers now that Netflix is bombing.
But I'm sure you knew all this, right?
"occasionally you'll come across one that's quite special like Game of Thrones."
OMFG, I've just responded to a post of yours not three minutes ago about this! GAME OF THRONES WAS RUINED BY BAD FINAL SEASONS!! Why don't you get that, Stickman38??
Come on, you didn't like Khaleesi roasting King's Landing and everyone in it??
Lol... that was the best part of the whole show.
Okay okay... it wasn't the greatest ending. But the ending really wasn't that surprising, dragons have always been city roasters for like forever. You're not one of those Millennials that named their kid after Daenerys are you?
It was predictable beyond belief, having Dany burn King's Landing to the ground because her father, the Mad King, threatened to blow it up with that green stuff. It was actually quite boring.
I'm not even a millennial.
Yeah, it was predictable but the last one standing was quite surprising, especially when you consider he can't actually stand.
If it was up to me, I would have gone with either Tywin Lannister on the throne at the end or the white walkers kill everyone. lol...
How would you have ended it?
What happened on the show itself is pretty tame compared to stuff they talk about in history and lore.
shareI guess you're referring to dragons. Yes, they're always city destroyers.
Although, in eastern culture, dragons are seen as good creatures.
I was thinking that we might see a spin on dragons in GoT in which they turn out to be good lizards with Dany in control of them but nope, she is a "classic dragon". The ending made sense in this regards but it was a rather mundane ending. There was not much of a climactic battle, it was just a complete wipe-out. lol...
My guess... prequels have established characters or lore that can be mined with new and cheap faces. If you go forward sometimes you have to pay someone like Han Solo $20 million and build a new story from scratch off a story that has already ended.
shareInteresting because this one starts with a lot bigger names than GoT.
GoT had only Sean Bean. This one has bigger names.
Charles Dance and Peter Dinklage are well known actors. Jason Momoa is a pretty big star too.
shareMomoa was very episodic and wasn't THAT big at that moment. The only notable role before GoT was in SG: Atlantis. He become big after GoT started. I mean Conan was a failure so I wouldn't count it as a big role ...
Dinklage was a bit better but not by much, the only notable role of him that I can think of prior to 2011 was Death at a Funeral.
Charles Dance yes, had a few more roles under his belt prior to that but I can't say I knew him as a great actor before GoT.
I would consider Smith, Paddy Considine, Rhys Ifans, McTavish way bigger than Momoa was in 2011.
Not sure what country you're in, asom, but a lot people here in the states knew who Momoa, Dance and Dinklage were. But one thing that worked fairly well in GoT was the lack of star power. Using unknowns made it seem more believable in GoT. Not sure if they can pull this off for HOTD. The casting for GoT was damn good...
shareDoesn't matter where I live. Momoa before 2011 had only one big role in the TV - SG Atlantis and one in the movie industry: Conan. And Conan was ... meh.
I didn't say that they were unknown, but they weren't "stars" or big names.
Agree to disagree.
I honestly didn't recognize one person except for Matt Smith, and I barely know who he is. I don't watch a lot of British shows though.
In GOT I recognized quite a few of the actors from the first episode - Dinklage (The Station Agent and more), Headey (300), Mark Addy (Full Monty, Knight's Tale, Still Standing), and of course Sean Bean.
Yeah. The boring and wholly accurate answer is money.
There is another, more charitable answer though. You'll find even many relatively unsuccessful sci-fi/fantasy series follow the same patterns of having sequels, prequels and spin-offs. Even vanity published stuff in those genres. It's just part of the deal.
And it's because authors who world-build in this way enjoy playing around in the worlds they create and continue to furnish those worlds. Once you start creating a universe, it might be difficult to stop.
But, even with that in mind, the accurate answer is still very much: money.
Prequel is a way of saying 'I got no ideas left at this point moving forward, so I'm just gonna expand on some crap that was briefly mentioned in the original'.
And you are absolutely right - as far as track record is concerned, prequels appear to be even worse than the shitty (usually) sequels.
Money issues aside, it's actually easier to make a prequel than a sequel to some massive save-the-world Fantasy genre saga like this one. As with Tolkien's saga, all the magic is fading out of the world, there will be no more Others or Dragons or Giants, from now on it's only going to be humans acting like humans. So really, stories set in Westeros after the War of Five Kings and Two Queens are no longer going to be Fantasy genre stuff, in order to capture the Fantasy element the writers need to go to Westeros's past, when the world was full of magical/supernatural stuff.
And this is why the new "LOTR" show is a prequel as well, even Tolkien himself couldn't write a sequel to "LoTR". And this whole saga is massively influenced by Tolkien, everything GRRM wrote was either a copy of Tolkien, an attempt to be the Anti-Tolkien, or a parody of Tolkien.
Doing prequels isn't something new it's been in literature and film for a long time. It's just another way of making money of a successful story/product.
share