"Is just a small movie speaking about a system which doesn’t work. Is real and disturbing? Yes, it is!. But not too real and not too disturbing! Is too common. Is not something new or different! We are too used in doing things without a finality. Is the purpose of this movie the shock? Well, for the western viewers, probably it will work. Not for me. But except shocking there is something else? No, I don’t think so! For example, Noe’ “Irreversible” or Miike’ “Audition” where shocking and disturbing also, but at least those movies had a purpose. This one does not!"
Forgive the interjection of a foreigner, but though I am British, my speciality is Romanian history (and thereto, its culture of course).
I have to tell you that I have seen films of Romania in the 1930s, and what you say, is unfortunately true of films then too.
Interesting, yes. Well-acted, certainly. Original? No.
Only in the vein of animated cartoons has the Romanian soul allowed itself to expand from, and to conquer its visual confines. That has been true since the 1920s (something shared with other E. European cultures, as everyone knows).
But this is the tortured part of Romanian culture I simply do not like:
You don't rate MDL because it is too common in theme.
Perhaps it is.
But then so was one of the greatest films ever made, De Sica's "Umberto D.", which I just recommended to IMDB for those who like The Death of Mr. Lazarescu.
That story was the ageless tale of a lonely, impoverished ex-civil servant, who clings with all his might to the few shreds of dignity and honour he has available to him, in a world which dismisses the aged, the poor, and the lonely.
His only companion is his dog, Flike:
A figure which stands for everything Umberto D. needs -- companionship, dependence, duty to something other than the self (one which keeps him wanting to live). The parallels to the cats of Mr. Lazarescu are immediately visible.
This is a modest tale, but its truthful pathos packs the biggest wallop any film has ever shown on celluloid.
It is the quintessential Neo-Realism film.
(And it comes from Italy during the post-bellum period, which was as dark as anything experience by Romanians)
Earlier someone took exception to the dismissive comments about this film, by another commenter. He said that person might think if it wasn't "Hollywood American=good", some people might dismiss MDL.
I am not a basher of Hollywood, nor an apologist, but I believe what people like about Hollywood is the professionalism, the quality, and even the diversity of ideas that continues to propel and compel people to watch its products.
That is possibly what Romanians want in their films -- not just the quality of storyline, but the cinematic professionalism that other cultures take for granted.
That comes with time.
Moarte Domnului Lazarescu, in the meantime, is a great story, with good acting, and if perhaps not terribly polished, is a film which can appeal to a wide audience.
Don't sell it short just because it's a simple story.
reply
share