MovieChat Forums > Doctor Who (2006) Discussion > When did Doctor Who start to suck?

When did Doctor Who start to suck?


From just reading any online message board, there is overwhelming consensus that Doctor Who became completely unwatchable tripe by the time “Bill” showed up during the Calpaldi era.

We can discuss and debate whether or not the show will continue to be unwatchable tripe under Chris Chibnall’s watch (in my opinion, the jury is out and I will wait to gather more information before I pass judgement, though I consider it to be a monumental task to try and salvage NuWho at this point, given how utterly Moffat has destroyed any credibility the show has left and alienated the vast majority of long time viewers)

However, a topic that gets considerably LESS attention is when did Doctor Who BEGIN to suck? The current decline that has utterly decimated the show and lead the latest desperate “stunt casting” to try and create “buzz” and get people to check it out again had to START somewhere.

So Whoivans, when was the FIRST time you watched nuWho and had this feeling of uncertainty, going “hmmm… this just isn’t fun or satisfying like it used to be. Something is wrong…” ?

My best guesstimate is around the time of “A Good Man Goes to War”. The introduction of the awful “Paternoster Gang” and the BBC then pretending that fans loved these worthless one-dimensional SJW characters and were begging for more appearances from them was an ominous sign that the series had begun its downhill slide.

What say you, fellow Whovians?

reply

For me it was a shaky proposition from the start. Time War backstory, mundane companion profiles, wonky steampunk TARDIS, funky dude Doctor, atrocious opening theme music and graphics, heavyhanded dumbed-down stories, bad pacing and probably other problems. I had the distinct feeling that the show was trying to fit into the hyper "Reality TV" culture of the year 2000 onwards era.

They did attempt to ameliorate these issues under the direction of Steven Moffat but the plonking, lecturing Doctor and friends team ethic still remained as did the essentially basic approach to stories and characters.

It's worth pointing out that this miscalculation started out in the Peter Davidson era onwards before NuWho existed years later. The idea of making Doctor Who a product and a platform for pleasing special interests really got into gear around 1980. That entailed changes to a number of things about the show to "make it better". Radically changing the opening graphics and musical theme, pushing the Doctor as a commercial image with "question mark" regalia as part of his costume, and bland silly story ideas which eschewed the intelligent writing of the likes of Malcolm Hulke, Douglas Adams, Robert Holmes, Terrance Dicks, etc. were changes that didn't make the show more appealing and probably contributed to it being terminated by 1989. Essentially NuWho was/is a continuation of the production ideas and objectives of the 1980s era with the exception of more advanced graphics.

reply

Id say with the exception of the odd episode here and there nuwho sucked from the get go. I know Im in the minority in that, and thats fine. I just think it spend far too many episodes on earth. "where do you want to go? We can anywhere in time and space?" And yet they ended up in london or cardiff most of the time. RTD could be a bit OTT when it came to his social justice messages. It wasnt as bad as torchwood, but it was close. I hear that the new show runner also worked on torchwood so I have even less faith in the new era than I had in moffets.

reply

Matt Smith's last season is when the show hit the wall.

reply

Agreed.

That season what remained of Russell T Davies in the show finally vanished and the whole thing went to hell.

reply

I also agree. I liked Matt Smith but his last season was weak.

reply

Series 6

reply

As has been said from the Fifth Doctor on it got a bit pandering to the BBC marketing department which saw it's inevitable demise. NuWho really showed signs of being back to that in Series 5, Episode 3 Victory of the Daleks when they decided to bring in the different coloured "New Dalek Paradigm" all because the BBC and BBC America wanted new toys to sell and wanted the Daleks in different colours (so you had to collect them all).

From that point on it started to slide as they tried to write stories around what the BBC and BBC America wanted to happen. Plus to get American audiences involved, Rose and the Doctor was pure CW network type stuff, like they play with in Arrow and The Flash. It was then David Tennant also pretty much became a parody of himself which lead to that god awful long death scene of his that seemed like it was meant for a Family Guy piss-take.

Having said that I do believe they can come back from it, there have been really good episodes among it, if James Bond can come back from junk like Moonraker then Who can come back as well.

reply

At the time Tennant's death scene reminded me of the death of Amilyn in the 1992 Buffy The Vampire Slayer movie, to which I think may still be going on now 26 years later.

This one and after the black fade is where it was still going mid-credits: https://youtu.be/IHVh_S9NGIU

And yep the pandering to overseas interests made it lose something, the 1996 Doctor Who movie with Paul McGann in was a big foreshadowing of what it would be like (like the Doctor's first on-screen kiss was in it), McGann himself was a good Doctor choice just the script stunk.

Goodness knows what will happen after this kicks in properly that was signed in May last year:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/worldwide/2017/doctor-who-china



BBC Worldwide today announced a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with leading Chinese media company, Shanghai Media Group Pictures (SMG Pictures) that will see expansion of the Doctor Who brand in China.

The agreement will see BBC Worldwide working with SMG Pictures to increase the Doctor Who fan base in China, exploring future opportunities as well as exchanging expertise between the two teams. The MOU comes on the back of a content deal that BBC Worldwide also signed with SMG Pictures yesterday evening. The deal will see the entire catalogue of Doctor Who including spin-offs, Torchwood and Class available on popular TV channels and on-demand platforms all over China.

The deal not only covers Showrunners Russell T Davies and Steven Moffat’s Series 1- 10, but also incoming Showrunner Chris Chibnall’s yet-to-film Series 11, as well as a first look for Series 12-15.


Wouldn't be surprised if it already has though, as I wouldn't be surprised if the shooting with an anamorphic lens is thanks to China, after all it's how most of their movies are done, so given the money China are putting in more is likely to come.

reply

Can only speak for myself (obviously), but I know I really started to lose interest in the show with the onset of Matt Smith. Didn't like his performance, and it just grated on me more and more -- it seemed so calculatedly "zany", which has never appealed, and with his new companions having Gen-X firmly in their sights and speech I realised I wasn't being catered for (or even accommodated) any more.

That's fine, I guess it's the evolution of TV shows and so is Just What Happens. But I felt like a Doctor's Companion who has realised it's time to get on with his life and stop hanging around police call boxes. I think I've only watched maybe three Capaldi eps -- I do admire him as an actor, but not much in this -- and the business of the new "As a feminist I'm excited" Doctor has left me with my sails luffing.

Never mind. I've started rewatching the NuWho from the Advent of Eccleston on Netflix, and so far (halfway through series 4) am having a bloody good time with it. I'll see when/if I feel it starts to sour.

reply

I agree, I've completely lost interest in this last season, I can't think of one episode I've really enjoyed or which has even kept my attention. When they showed the flashbacks at the end, it made me really sad that the days when Doctor Who was fun and not just a dreary dirge are gone... I really hope the new Doctor sees a change in that but I'm not holding my breath as it seems to be more about the storylines than Peter Capaldi himself.

reply

>>>I agree, I've completely lost interest in this last season, I can't think of one episode I've really enjoyed or which has even kept my attention. When they showed the flashbacks at the end, it made me really sad that the days when Doctor Who was fun and not just a dreary dirge are gone... I really hope the new Doctor sees a change in that but I'm not holding my breath<<<

BINGO! You've nailed it. I actually feel story Capaldi's entire era was squandered by Moffat. It cannot compare to the good ol' days of THIS:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9kSf8w28Fs4

reply

I came to comment almost the exact same thing!

Matt Smith's forced 'cute/crazy' really turned me off, and I stopped watching somewhere before the Pond's left.
Not intentionally mind you, just got too busy and then just didn't care to start again.
And once Bill started (and I read all the fan hate) there wasn't really a driving force to change my opinion.

I grew up watching Classic Who with my Grandparent's, so maybe I'm too biased when it comes to NuWho, but it seems like it's just getting worse.

Currently rewatching Eccleston/Tennant (and loving it), and will most likely stop again when Smith starts.

reply

I think it's really unfair to put it on "Bill" (not sure why the quotes since it is her name) but yeah it did. I think Moffat just got fed up with it and fully intended to end his run (and possibly the show) with last year's Christmas Special. It's no coincidence River was there to give these two a "happily ever after", well as far as one night goes anyway.

Then BBC probably decided to give the show another series and got Moffat on board but he was done with the story and he didn't really feel like giving more to it.

I completely disagree on A Good Man Goes to War. And I wouldn't call casting a new doctor "stunt casting" but then I'm not a dude and I also have a woman so I guess I can't think quite like pitiful Whovian virgins who live in their parents basement and have mommy issues...

reply

>>> I think it's really unfair to put it on "Bill" (not sure why the quotes since it is her name) <<<

It is a fact that the show became COMPLETELY unwatchable once "Bill" showed up, and the ratings reflect that (over 1 million die hard Whovians STOPPED watching the show after they learned the Doctor's new companion would be "Bill", and I'm proud to say I'm among them)

The idiotic idea of a female companion having a male name rightfully deserves ridicule (there are female variations on "Bill", nobody would have objected if the companion was named Billie Jean or Williamina), and is in quotes she she cannot be taken seriously as an actual character. It was truly Doctor Who's jump the shark moment, just like it was idiotic on Happy Days to show Fonzie literally jumping a shark on water skies while wearing his leather jacket over his swimming trucks.

reply

And Fonzie jumped that shark in episode 3 season 5 and the show went on for 6 more seasons as the writer himself said:

http://articles.latimes.com/2010/sep/03/entertainment/la-et-jump-the-shark-20100903

There were no objections from the cast, the studio or the network concerning "Hollywood 3," as it came to be titled. It aired Sept. 20, 1977, and was a huge hit, ranking No. 3 for the week with a 50-plus share (unheard of today) and an audience of more than 30 million viewers.

All successful shows eventually start to decline, but this was not "Happy Days'" time. Consider: It was the 91st episode and the fifth season. If this was really the beginning of a downward spiral, why did the show stay on the air for six more seasons and shoot an additional 164 episodes? Why did we rank among the Top 25 in five of those six seasons?


If the saying was that TV show has been Great Gazooed then I may go along with it as that was the beginning of the end of The Flintstones when that little green martian came in. Though the Bill name has never bothered me as I have an Aunt we call Bill, so it is a normal thing, then there's the film Aunt Bill and Aunt Bill's brown candy, so yeah.

Like you say in the first post though, people were going before Bill turned up as per:

reply

Consolidated ratings still aren't in for WHO 2017 but yeah they're way down compared to pre 2015 and likely slightly down on 2015. 2015 averaged out at 6.7 mill mark on the whole season for final figures and this season if it tracks similar will be about 5.9 mill (800,000 less viewers).

http://www.doctorwhotv.co.uk/doctor-who-series-10-2017-uk-ratings-accumulator-84045.htm

2017 Ratings
The Pilot 4.64m (O) 6.68m (C) tbc (L+7) 83 (AI)
Smile 4.25m (O) 5.98m (C) tbc (L+7) 83 (AI)
Thin Ice 3.76m (O) 5.61m (C) tbc (L+7) 84 (AI)
Knock Knock 4.32m (O) 5.73m (C) tbc (L+7) 83 (AI)
Oxygen 3.57m (O) 5.27m (C) tbc (L+7) 83 (AI)
Extremis 4.16m (O) 5.53m (C) tbc (L+7) 82 (AI)
The Pyramid at the End of the World 4.01m (O) 5.79m (C) tbc (L+7) 82 (AI)
The Lie of the Land 3.01m (O) 4.82m (C) tbc (L+7) 82 (AI)
Empress of Mars 3.58m (O) 5.02m (C) tbc (L+7) 83 (AI)
The Eaters of Light 2.89m (O) 4.73m (C) tbc (L+7) 81 (AI)
World Enough and Time 3.37m (O) 5.0m (C) tbc (L+7) 85 (AI)
The Doctor Falls 3.75m (O) 5.29m (C) tbc (L+7) 83 (AI)

2015 ratings:
The Magician’s Apprentice 4.58m (O) 6.54m (C) 7.41m (L+7) 84 (AI)
The Witch’s Familiar 3.7m (O) 5.71m (C) 6.58m (L+7) 83 (AI)
Under the Lake 3.7m (O) 5.63m (C) 6.51m (L+7) 84 (AI)
Before the Flood 4.38m (O) 6.05m (final) 6.77m (L+7) 83 (AI)
The Girl Who Died 4.85m (O) 6.56m (C) 7.19m (L+7) 82 (AI)
The Woman Who Lived 4.34m (O) 6.11m (C) 6.73m (L+7) 81 (AI)
The Zygon Invasion 3.87m (O) 5.76m (C) 6.49m (L+7) 82 (AI)
The Zygon Inversion 4.13m (O) 6.03m (C) 6.48m (L+7) 84 (AI)
Sleep No More 4.0m (O) 5.61m (C) 6.09m (L+7) 78 (AI)
Face the Raven 4.42m (O) 6.05m (C) 6.55m (L+7) 84 (AI)
Heaven Sent 4.51m (O) 6.19m (C) 6.92m (L+7) 80 (AI)
Hell Bent 4.8m (O) 6.17m (C) 6.86m (L+7) 82 (AI)


2014 for interest sake averaged out at about 8.3 mill: http://www.doctorwhotv.co.uk/doctor-who-series-8-ratings-accumulator-66394.htm so basically at the end of 2014 1.6 million people didn't return to watch Capaladi in 2015 and that viewership drop continued in 2017 with as I said a likely 800,000 viewers gone.

Note: I took out the Christmas Special for 2014 as that makes it an even 12 episodes to 2015, as if I include the Christmas Special in 2014 and divide by 13 eps it makes 2014 ratings lower than 2015 at 6.3 mill. The real tell will come when the 2017 Christmas episode happens and the consolidated/final ratings are up. As it aired ratings shows a very similar loss of viewers 2014 4.7 ave, 2015 4.2 ave and 2017 3.7 ave., though a lot more people chose to watch later in 2015, as when you do (o) 2015 is at 6.2 mill (2 mill more) and 2017 is at 5.4 mill (1.7 mill more)

reply

ReelReviews:
Oh, come on----I actually knew a woman when I was a child named Michael. Who cares whether a woman has a man's name or not? That's a silly thing to complain about.

reply

In my opinion it was when Clara was introduced as the companion. When Capaldi replaced Smith as the Doctor the uncomfortable but developed relationship was lost. That reached it's height when we actually got to listen to Clara pout the Doctor wasn't hot enough for her anymore like she could do better. And once Bill was introduced it was as if the executives had interfered and decided to rewrite the show for children and just recycle the most unmemorable episodes.

reply

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And once Bill was introduced it was as if the executives had interfered and decided to rewrite the show for SJWs and just recycle the most unmemorable episodes.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Made a one word edit, and now your comment is 100% spot-on.

reply

Lol.

reply