I'm 25 now (18 when this came out) and I am not a fan of this movie. Though John Carpenter's original is my favorite movie, I love remakes and I went into this with an open mind. When I saw it in theaters, I forgave its many flaws because I liked bits and pieces. The scene where Michael beats his classmate to death with a tree branch? Ugh, that was unsettling.
A year later, I rented this movie to watch it with friends, and we got the unrated version. I didn't notice any real differences until it came to Michael's escape. In the theatrical version, he uses his massive size to overpower the guards and get away. In the unrated version, the guards abuse their power to rape a female inmate and Michael kills them for touching his masks, and then just decides to leave since his cell is unlocked. What the absolute *beep*? In the original, he escapes because he WANTS to escape, not because he has nothing better to do (for anyone who disagrees, remember that he escapes before he is supposed to be moved, not during his move). And I cannot understand why Rob Zombie made Michael love masks so much. Is there some symbolism I'm missing? It didn't seem like Michael hid a lot of his creepiness as a child, so he didn't have a figurative mask to don. He even killed a nurse while his mother was visiting.
After watching that wholly unnecessary change to an already flawed movie, I just grew to hate it. I could no longer find reasons to defend it. I disliked the atmosphere, the unnecessary amount of swearing, the unlovable characters, and the utterly ridiculous redneck Myers family.
On the other hand, my brother is nine years older than me and he loves this movie. He thinks the original is boring and predictable and finds it much scarier that Michael has a motive for killing. He also really enjoys the ultra-violence and shock value. Our opinions couldn't be more opposite.
If I have to be like them, I'd rather be no one.
reply
share