MovieChat Forums > Higher Learning (1995) Discussion > Wait! THAT WAS RAPE? Nah, sorry, but i...

Wait! THAT WAS RAPE? Nah, sorry, but it wasn't.

posted 17 years ago by trompos
79 replies | jump to latest

I don't really blame the fictional character for feeling she was raped, I blame the bad writers for making the transition from ecstasy to screams of violation so abrupt.

The couple goes upstairs to have sex. The guy pulls the girl's panties down to the sounds of her wanting moans. They begin to have actual intercourse with no problem, until the question of a condom comes to light. The guy continues to get his groove on (wrong wrong wrong on his part) the girl screams for him to get a condom and suddenly it's rape. Not only is this girl really disturbed, but the guy is a moron. DUDE THE CHICK WANTS YOU, stop get a rubber slip it on and you're gravy. No, instead the writers made the guy a moron who goes deaf when he has sex, and the girl an over-reactor who goes from wanting it to calling it rape because the guy goes raw dogs. If the movie wanted to be powerful and show a rape scene, SHOW A RAPE SCENE. This is an insult to women who have actually been raped.

If you love Jesus Christ and are 100% proud of it, copy this and make it your signature!

[–] 11 years ago

[deleted]

[–] kairingler 11 years ago

yea I agree, that wasn't rape at all,, she spread her legs wide open,,,
are you going to bark all day little doggie,, or are you going to bite

[–] activista 11 years ago

@kairingler

Oh, so beacuse she "spread her legs open" that justified any damn thing he wanted to do to her? Get the *beep* out of here with that bull****,seriously. And,hell,yeah, it was rape. What a stupid,idiot troll you are.

[–] Citation_Needed 11 years ago

Someone should make you a judge. I will write the president and try to get you on the supreme court but I don't think they see many rape cases.

[–] 11 years ago

[deleted]

[–] gabby_bm 10 years ago

And then when he couldn;t produce a condom, she said "no" and put a stop to it before she got AIDS, herpes or pregnant. It was then that her invitation was rescinded with a very clear "no". He ignored that.

And then he raped her.

He was a dumbass.
If he were smart he would have just played around with her without the sex and, with any luck, eventually gotten her so horny she would say "what the hell" and have sex with him anyway (or at least gotten a hand-job or blow-job for his caring and understanding)
But no. The guy was an idiot.

And a rapist.

**WARNING: MY POSTS MAY CONTAIN SPOILERS**
.

[–] HOKfilms 10 years ago

It was clearly rape and anybody that thinks any different, is a fvckin idiot.

I <3 Emily Blunt

[–] ecaftnucuoykcuf 10 years ago

She said no and he forced himself upon her. This isn't rocket science. Common sense says it's rape and the law says it's rape. Try a little harder to get your head out of your rectum.