Why did this movie flop?


I am trying to understand why this movie flopped. I love this movie. I am 27 now, and it came out in my teens. I still can't get enough of this movie. It was fun, entertaining, great music, funny, good action, etc.... It was all those things when I was a teen, and it certainly is still all those things now. I know lots of people of enjoyed this movie. If you think about it, it isn't that far off from Pirates of the Caribbean, yet it did great. I just don't understand.

reply

A surfeit of bad acting and a rubbish script.
The only good actor in the whole film was the monkey.
Ands he/she worked for peanuts unlike the rest of the over paid untalented motley crew of( I hesitate to say) Actors.

reply

It flopped because it is a very bad movie. Not at problem with women pirates or Geena Davis. It was just bad plot, bad acting, and bad direction.
It's really too bad. I, and a lot of other people, really wanted it to be good. It was time for a revival of the pirate genre. But the really poor execution of this movie postponed that by eight years.

reply

how can people find out if a movie is bad if nobody chose to go see it????

good or bad, it doesn't explain why a $100 million blockbuster movie makes 0.5 in its opening weekend.

look at these movies, undeniably much much worse with and look how much they made.

BATMAN AND ROBIN 130 million!!!
Nutty Proffessor 2 125 million
Pearl Harbour 200 million
meet the fockers 280 million
Van Helsing 300 million
Alien vs Predator 170 million
avp2 140 million
Cutthroat island 10 million??????????

simple truth is Gena Davis and pirates didnt appeal to people. so they didnt even give it a chance.


i think this review says it better.

When Cutthroat Island was released in 1995, it was a monumental flop on the scale of Waterworld. Between casting woes, an overinflated budget, and MGM's refusal to spend any money on marketing, advance word of the film was sour, and Cutthroat Island sank out of sight after a mere week in U.S. theaters. The film recouped only about $10,000,000 of its massive $92,000,000 production costs, bankrupting Carolco Pictures and spelling doom for the box-office viability of future pirate flicks. Since then, the film has found a small cult following on home video, director Renny Harlin has become even more of a hack, and Disney has surprisingly resurrected the pirate genre with its hugely successful, Gore Verbinski-helmed trilogy. On the surface, Cutthroat Island and the Pirates of the Caribbean films have a lot in common—swashbuckling highjinks in tropical locales, massive action set pieces, and romance on the high seas—so why did Renny Harlin's ill-fated adventure fail while Disney went on to create a franchise? There are myriad reasons, I'm sure, but consider these names: Johnny Depp, Keira Knightley, and Orlando Bloom. That's a bankable trio. Matthew Modine, Geena Davis, and Frank Langella? Not so much. But it can't all come down to star power, can it?

Well, maybe. The story concerns female pirate Morgan Adams (Geena Davis), whose dying father has just commanded her to scalp him. You see, Harry Morgan has one third of a map to Cutthroat Island tattooed on his dome piece, and he wants his daughter to have it before he gets a locker next to Davy Jones. Morgan does some off-camera surgery, becomes the new captain of her father's ship, and sets sail for Port Royal, where she picks up William Shaw (Matthew Modine), a conniving thief who is just educated enough to translate the Latin on the map. After being spotted by Royal Navy redcoats, Morgan and her crew of scallywags narrowly escape and head to a brothel to retrieve the second portion of the map from Morgan's uncle Mordecai. With the location of the island now revealed, they cut through deadly seas toward their very own treasure island, pursued by nefarious pirate Dawg Brown (Frank Langella), Morgan's other uncle—sheesh, what's with this family—and possessor of the final third of the map. Once they make ground, Morgan and Shaw's tenuous alliance is strained by sexual tension and greed, but they have to work together if it means reaching the treasure and getting out alive.

Filmed in Malta and Thailand, Cutthroat Island is every bit as big as Pirates of the Caribbean. Renny Harlin clearly made the most of his nearly unlimited bankroll, turning every childhood pirate fantasy imaginable into wild, explosion-filled set pieces that are all the more impressive for being wholly unaided by CGI. There's one stunt in particular, where Geena Davis flips through a second-story glass window and down onto the seat of a rushing horse-drawn carriage, which will have you scratching your head for days. The film's pace rarely lets up, and we're drawn from one dizzying, death-defying encounter to the next, with only short character- building scenes for breathing space. Take a second to think of all the pirate movie clichés you've ever seen. Got 'em? Now, I guarantee you that every single one of them is present in Cutthroat Island. Does someone swing from a chandelier? Is there swordfight on top of the mainsail? Will a cute monkey provide endless comic relief? Yes, yes, and yes. It's as if someone told Renny Harlin, "Look, we're going to give you one hundred million dollars to make a pirate movie, but you've got to watch every swashbuckling tale since The Black Pirate with Douglas Fairbanks, write down everything that happens, and put it all in your film." There's a mutiny, a half-submerged treasure in a perilous cave, a thunderous maritime cannon battle, some sly double entendres, and more steel-on-steel action than you could, well, shake a sword at. The only thing missing is a pirate getting hit on the head by a coconut. And while there's nothing we haven't seen before, Cutthroat Island is at least consistently entertaining, even if the principle actors don't quite seem suited for their parts.

reply

This movie is awesome. I do not know how it could flop. sighs

reply

The script was dull, the action scenes were coma inducing and Davis was not at all hot in this film. Put in more jokes or blood and it’d become watchable.

Why do people so frequently get told to "read the book" on a movie database?

reply

This movie flopped cause i'm only just now even attempting to watch it. Geena Davis is massive turn off. Her brief stint as a somehow action star still makes me shudder.

http://www.movingimagesource.us/articles/the-middle-word-in-life-20100 406

reply

[deleted]

This movie was doomed as soon as Matthew Modine was cast. He couldn't possibly have been worse in this role.

Geena Davis is a fantastic actress, but she too was slightly miscast. Still how do you have any chemistry with an effeminate, boring leading man?

reply


They tried and failed to land Michael Douglas, the director was not very good and the script sucked.


Its that man again!!

reply

To OP: for me three things: cost ($98 million - ridiculous even in today's climate and made in return total $18,517,322) lack of star appeal and limited release.


My Voting history is secret;)

reply

this movie flopped because people just werent interested in pirate adventure movies at the time. only reason. if they had been, this film would have been a success despite its flaws which really arent that huge.

reply

Yeah, I don't get why people tear this film apart so badly. I'd never consider claiming it's a great movie, but I can think of TONS of movies that are a hell of a lot worse and yet make ten or twenty times more money. CutThroat Island was fun, it didn't take itself seriously, the stunts were spectacular (I still have no idea how they did the shot of Geena Davis smashing through a window, rolling off a roof and landing on a moving carriage) and the location shooting was beautiful.

OK, so some of the acting was kinda bad, but a lot of the acting in the Pirates of the Caribbean films is pretty crap, and yet people flock to watch them. Plus the action scenes were a lot more spectacular in CutThroat, and looked a lot better because they were mostly done practically. And MY GOD why were the second and third Pirates films so damn convoluted?! There's embellishing a movie with interesting plot twists, and then there's just forcing nonsensical plot twists every few minutes in some desperate attempt to recapture the double-dealing that made the first film so much fun. At least CutThroat was simple and straightforward. I'd take it over Dead Man's Chest/At World's End any day.

reply

Overall it's an ok movie.
Compared to the Pirates of the Carribean movies it had three mayor problems:
1) Star power. PotC had three well-known lead actors (Johnny Depp, Orlando Bloom, Geoffrey Rush), whose names could carry a movie on their own (even one of them would have been enough) and a female lead actress pretty much at the beginning of her carreer. CI had Geena Davis, whose previous three movies had flopped or barely made their money back, her only well-known role was Thelma in Thelma and Louise and whose Hollywood carreer was basically over.
2) Marketing. The marketing campaign for PotC was huge. The marketing for CI was not.
3) Timing. There had been somewhat successful movies featuring pirates in the 1990s (Hook was a success in 1991), but those were more fantasy-orientated children's movies, not somewhat realistic action flicks. If CI had been released ten or so years later, it would maybe have been a success (or not flopped as much as it did), the producers could have used the popularity PotC had to promote CI.

In my oppinion it didn't flop because of a female lead actress (there have been successful action movies with female leads before and after, for examlple Alien or Tomb Raider), but because of the problems I mentioned above.

reply

I saw it for the 1st time this past weekend. It was enjoyable, and was definitely better, IMHO, than any of the PotC flicks. Beautifully shot, to be sure.
Still, Geena came across as Geena Davis in command of a pirate ship, rather than Geena-Davis-playing-a-pirate in command of a pirate ship.

One thing's for sure: the bud who screened the film for me sure was with you in wondering why the film didn't do so well.
I'd say it was just before the country was ready for pirate flicks.
Plus, Gina's character wasn't as enjoyable was Johnny Depp's. Hell, if it weren't for Depp's character I doubt Disney would be able to bankroll 3 sequels to a slightly overbearing original film.

reply

Bad acting, Weak story etc.. etc..
I felt abused after watching this cringe worthy nonsense.

It did have nice sets and locations.

reply

[deleted]