MovieChat Forums > Jurassic Park (1993) Discussion > JURASSIC PARK vs JURASSIC WORLD: Which H...

JURASSIC PARK vs JURASSIC WORLD: Which Had The Better Trilogy

posted 5 months ago by BKB (9877)
9 replies | jump to latest

How about it?? We're heading into the 4th Installment of JURASSIC WORLD, so I thought by now, it's a fair question as to which had the Better Trilogy as far as Quality goes?? 🤔

[–] freefallin (37) 5 months ago

Jurassic Park by far. I didn't really like any of the Jurassic World movies; dumb characters, illogical behavior, far-fetched stories and plots, mostly CGI dinos now means less realistic looking – Jurassic Park 1 is still the best looking movie in the franchise which is just sad, not for Jurassic Park it still holds up today, but for the newer movies DECADES later.

That moronic girl releasing all the dinos into the world causing who knows how many deaths made me roll my eyes and not want to watch anymore Jurassic movies. Has she been arrested for crimes against humanity yet?

I think most people will agree Jurassic Park 1 is the best out of the entire franchise. Then after that it seems to be personal preference between the various JP and JW movies. I thought Lost World was boring and forgettable. Jurassic Park 3 is my second favorite out of the franchise. I know tons of people hate JP3 but I thought it was a fun, silly movie if you didn't take it seriously. I didn't find any of the JW movies fun.

[–] BKB (9877) 5 months ago

I'd say The LOST WORLD was the Darker, More Violent of the JURASSIC PARK movies 🤔

[–] Tam87 (1173) 5 months ago

Agreed 100%.

The first two JP's have Spielberg's touch. The Lost World might not have been popular but the scenes with the T-Rex & Raptors in it were fantastic set pieces. JPIII is a fun film, and works thanks to the return of Sam Neill.

[–] damocci (1514) 4 months ago

I hate the "dinosaur rights" focus of the new trilogy. It's stupid, unreasonable, unrealistic, and thus unrelatable. It's hard to imagine anyone would think the rights of these extinct, artificial creations are important enough to risk human life. The original trilogy is vastly superior.

[–] Melton (4435) 5 months ago

Is this a serious question?

Jurassic Park is a masterpiece, Lost World is a fantastic sequel, the rest is just cash-grab slop.

[–] BKB (9877) 5 months ago

Actually, yes.. It is a serious question because both franchises made alot of $$$$$$ so it's simply natural to inquire about it?? It's either this or we argue endlessly over Trump/Biden and Politics in general and I'm already drained from that 🤔

[–] rudeboymurray (3270) 4 months ago

Well the first trilogy had an actual good film in it so I guess, by default, it’s the winner here.

[–] samoanjoes (56640) 4 months ago

Original trilogy and it's not even close for me. Part 1 is amazing, part 2 is fine and has some memorable scenes, and part 3 is pretty weak. I thought that it wouldn't get any worse than part 3... and then I saw "Dominion". Terrible film and there isn't a good film in that trilogy.

[–] DancingintheDark (1608) 4 months ago

JP trilogy by far, and regardless of how good the subsequent sequels were they at least had had a heart, the JW trilogy is void of heart and is nothing more than a hollow cash cow.