awful


easily worst of 3

reply

What, you didn't like Doc shouting all his dialog the entire film either, ha.

reply

[deleted]

The second film is worse. Not like it matters, both sequels pale in comparison to the first film. Back to the Future is a masterpiece while the sequels are simply decent movies

reply

[deleted]

The lesser two are still pretty enjoyable and decent films in their own right.

The first is the perfect film and hard to come close to that magic but the other two are still pretty great.

All the performances are fantastic especially Marty, Doc and Biff.

reply

I thought it wrapped up the storyline very well.

reply

Yeah, we always found Part III the weakest. Not to mention Doc’s love interest is annoying! Also the whole desert setting takes you out of the film, because Hill Valley is not a desert location.

Part I and II go together really well, at least until ‘chicken’, as there’s absolutely no reference to Marty being affected by a ‘chicken’ remark in the first film.

reply

Fake Crispin Glover kinda sticks out like a sore thumb too. That said 2 is still infinitely better than 3.

reply

Also, Marty’s girlfriend was hotter in the first film. ;)

reply

Hotter and also a better actress.

reply

I had no issue with the desert environment of Hill Valley. A large part of southern California is desert. That we have, in the 20th and 21st centuries mitigated these conditions in many areas doesn't negate that in th 19th most of the area would be desert.

reply

No, Clara is never annoying! She's awesome!

reply

I like better than II But the first film is still the best

reply

I always laugh at the end when he introduces is sons Jewels and Vern. Just the most ridiculous ending, lol.

reply

No, that would be Jules and Verne.

reply