MovieChat Forums > Halloween 4: The Return of Michael Myers (1988) Discussion > Why on earth did we not get to see Kelly...

Why on earth did we not get to see Kelly Meeker's tits?

posted 3 years ago by Mister Babadook (2709)
20 replies | jump to latest

Jesus those tits in that bra looked fucking amazing, then right when she unsnaps it and is pulling it off it cuts away. I mean wtf? slasher movies always show tits, Halloween 1 and 2 both showed tits, yet we have a huge pair of tits that they're teasing us with here and it cuts away and we don't see shit.

Talk about one of the biggest cock teases in a slasher movie, what a fucking bullshit tease.

I mean we see Katheen Kinmont's tits in the movie Fraternity Vacation which was 3 years before this move and her tits aren't nearly as big or perfect looking as they are in H4, i would kill to see her tits in Halloween 4 after she got the bigger tits.

She also show's her tits in The Corporate Ladder which was 1997 like 9 years after H4 and her tits look nice but not as great as they looked in that bra in H4. Its like her tits was absolutely perfect looking around the time of Halloween 4 and its the one time she doesn't show her tits.... Its so weird shes showed her tits in alot of movies but never did they look like they did in Halloween 4 in that bra.

[–] MinorityRules15 (963) 3 years ago

If I understand your post correctly, it seems you really wanted to see her tits in this movie. Am I right?

[–] Mister Babadook (2709) 3 years ago

Thats a big 10 4 partner.

[–] agentalbert (3381) 3 years ago

That was disappointing. What little we glimpsed looked glorious.

[–] cyberbob (3488) 3 years ago

Only the first two Halloweens showed any nudity. Those and the Rob Zombie ones, but Zombie would sink to just about any depth for attention

Slashers don't actually always show tits. Friday the 13th franchise is famous for showing tits, but then again Friday the 13th is famous for being as low-brow as it gets. Nightmare on Elm Street showed tits only in a couple of them. Texas Chainsaw, Child's Play, Psycho, Saw, Scream, Candyman, Alien, etc. You don't actually get that much nudity throughout all of these movies

[–] [deleted] 3 years ago

And that is why Friday the 13th is the G.O.A.T slasher franchise. Unironically. Growing up watching these films as a young Teenager...there really was only one winner.

[–] [deleted] 3 years ago

I loved watching those too. A teenage boy couldn't ask for anything better back then. Watching Friday the 13th (any of them) was a guilty pleasure.

[–] TommyJarvis82 (2600) 3 years ago

There's also a little bit of nudity in Halloween 3 and 6.

Nudity is uneven in the big slasher franchises, but very common amongst the second-tier slasher franchises.

[–] Enigmaticocean77 (2490) 3 years ago

This is one of the most over explained, overly thought out, and overly frustrated posts (about not being able to see an actresses boobs) that I have ever read- and it's hysterically accurate too!

The reasoning behind not seeing said cleavage will go down as one of the greatest cinematic mysteries of all time. It may even be a greater mystery than if the missing spider scene from the original King King really existed!

[–] cyberbob (3488) 3 years ago

I have to agree. It's a great post about Kelly Meeker's tits that I never knew I needed

[–] [deleted] 3 years ago

[deleted]

[–] VanZan (932) 3 years ago

Dude I remember this film on television a school night many years ago. The very next day lads were saying even then exactly what you just posted.

That bra was positively heaving. Why were we denied the moment they were set free? Baffling as it couldn't have been because of concerns about the film's rating.

Maybe there's a workprint out there somewhere.

[–] TommyJarvis82 (2600) 3 years ago

According to the director on the audio commentary, the producer balked at it for some reason.

[–] agentalbert (3381) 2 years ago

I just watched the Joe Bob Briggs Last Drive in episode on this movie. Excellent, by the way. I probably liked it more than the movie. But Joe Bob says that when he first saw the movie, Kathleen Kinmont got topless and that somebody has been monkeying with the negative. Is this true? Was there a nude scene in the original theatrical edition that has been cut or swapped out for different footage in what is now available on blu-ray and streaming platforms?

[–] Mister Babadook (2709) 2 years ago

God i hope so.

[–] [deleted] 2 years ago

I think he was just making a joke.

If a topless scene existed it would be known about.