Charlize up for LGBT remake
Don't worry its not happening. yet
https://wegotthiscovered.com/movies/charlize-theron-star-femaledriven-die-hard-remake/
Don't worry its not happening. yet
https://wegotthiscovered.com/movies/charlize-theron-star-femaledriven-die-hard-remake/
Die Hard has been remade numerous times starring the likes of Steven Seagal, Dwayne Johnson, Harrison Ford, Kurt Russel (w Seagal! again), Anna Nicole Smith (probably the closest to the original), etc.
If they remade this movie and called it anything but Die Hard, nobody would care. People might even be interested based on Theron's star power. Call it Die Hard though and certain populations are sure to lose their mind.
Instead of remaking Die Hard maybe they could instead re-adapt the original novel Die Hard was based on I.E. Nothing Lasts Forever by Roderick Thorpe.
That way they could remake Die Hard without…..remaking Die Hard.
I read the book.
It was pretty good, the cop was a father trying to save his daughter.
Surprisingly the novel includes the scene where the cop jumps off the side of the building tied to the fire hose. I assumed that scene was only in the movie because it seemed like such a purely Hollywood manufactured action scene...
It's been years since I read the book, but the most fascinating difference to me -- spoiler alert, obviously-- is that after the Hans Gruber character dies (I think he's called Red Tony in the book?) the McClane character (also different name in the book) has by this point switched sides, and completes Tony's mission. To make it less confusing, I'll use the movie names.... Hans Gruber is not a thief, but a revolutionary, and he wants to rob Nakatomi Corp. and throw the money from the roof to the people. Initially McClane is out to stop him, but as he learns more about him, and about Nakatomi, he sides with Gruber, who he has killed, McClane gets the money and throws it from the roof.
I may be misremembering some aspects of this, but it's a fascinating book, and the changes made when adapting it turned it into something even better. One of those rare time the movie is better than the book; Jackie Brown comes to mind as another example.
Didn't they already do that and called it The Last Boy Scout?
shareThey could call it Lie Hard, especially if there's some tribbing in the film.
shareWhy would you be worried?
shareAnything to do with LGBT is immediately derided by keyboard warriors as woke sjw garbage or similar. The internet has regressed twenty years in the last four years.
shareThat's not really it. Remaking this movie with the main characters being Lesbians is just forced. Then again having a woman in her 50s play the John McClaine type character is kind of silly too. Why not get a younger actress? I also don't really want to see this movie remade. Then again with Disney owning the rights to it you can bet any new Die Hard movie is going to be PG-13. So will any new Predator or Alien movie.
share"Remaking this movie with the main characters being Lesbians is just forced."
So does this mean that females only exist so that you can have sex with them when they ask you for it?
Of course not. But you know it's only being done that way for political reasons. Personally, I am not for a remake at all.
shareTo be fair it usually is garbage because for some reason they start with "let's take an existing story and put LGBT in it" when it's always better that start fresh and organically develop a new story around such things.
Basically it's corporates/producers trying to ride the current trend to extract money from supporters of a cause they wouldn't even look twice at if it wasn't potentially profitable.
I agree with you, Triplea.
share"i've always been partial to annie oakley"
shareSome version of it already happened: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt6222118/
shareI'm surprised that no one has made a Dyke Hard joke.
shareThis is the remake we need because the weakest part of the original was the lack of lesbian representation.
share