Do you like Reg?


He was inept and was seemingly immune to being relived of his duties. But I can't deny that you could always trust him to not stab anyone in the back.

reply

Trouble was Reg wasn't inept. He showed that he could do his job and could actually be quite good at it. He just had personality flaws and lack of confidence that made him second guess everything and kept him from excelling.

For the record: Definitely preferred Dwight Schultz as Murdock over Reg.

reply

A lack of confidence could mean life of death on the Enterprise. Decisions needed to be made. I think he needed to work on his mental strength. He could have been someone worthy of the bridge.

reply

"life of [sic] death"

But the Enterprise isn't a military ship.

reply

Murdock is one of the all time great TV characters!

reply

I actually do like Reg, he's one of my favorite characters.

reply

He wasn’t inept. He just tended to get flustered.

reply

Yeah, maybe not inept. I think nerves just got the best of him. He was definitely a reliable guy.

reply

I really like Reg.

The actor who played him could be very funny and likable in a nerdy way, and personally I always thought that he was there as a bit of fan service - the show included someone like the nerdiest fans. Okay, maybe it was kind of backhanded fan service, because I was never sure if the character was a homage to the nerdiest fans, or a satire of them...

reply

Have you seen how he looks now? The dude hasn't aged that much.

reply

I like Reg. His episodes are some of my favorites.

reply

You obviously don't, samoanjoes, and are just looking for others to agree with your misjudged assessment of him.

I like him, as I would probably also be nervous like that. And the actor played frickin' Murdock in the A-Team, for crying out loud!! What's not to like?

reply

I'm not looking for anyone to agree with me. My last sentence was giving him credit.

reply

"But I can't deny that you could always trust him to not stab anyone in the back."

Credit? No Starfleet officer would do that, so that's a bit of a stretch, don't you think?

reply

But also his honesty and his work ethic. He always tried to better himself.

reply

He served his purpose on the show (a man of rare low confidence in a world of high status competence).

reply

That was one of the things I liked most about him, TNG tends to be far too utopian and in general the relationships on shipboard are a bit too smooth and the people are a bit too flawless to be believable, so it was nice that they included someone who was blatantly flawed. Reg's presence cut through the utopianism stickiness and made the show a bit more believable, they should have included him in more episodes.

reply

Well said but once per season was enough for him the way he was written. They needed a George Costanza type character but with fewer ethical issues.

reply

Certainly the show didn't need that many Reg-centric episodes, even if some of his episodes are among my favorites. No, I'd just liked to have seen him around more, being a supporting character, doing his job competently, and providing some laugh lines. That show SO needed more laughs!

reply

The producers decided that they definitely did not want a light edge to the show. It has been said that issue was taken with TOS efforts such as The Trouble With Tribbles and A Piece Of The Action in that respect. That they did not want characters basically doing jokes such in The Apple when at the end Spock was compared to Satan. Not that they always avoided jokes and light humor such as when Laxwanna Troi appeared or a Ferengi based episode but the tone was different. But the bottom line was they did not want characters doing lines like a 1970's sitcom. Nor that they wanted "vital" characters to be done as send ups such as Scotty drinking the Kelvin under the table in By Any Other Name.

reply

That was a bad decision! One of the things I love about TOS was that it's all over the place, from the tightest suspense to the most farcical comedy, and with bits of comedy thrown into suspenseful situations. Which BTW is true to life, when people work in incredibly stressful situations, like having to save the Federation or the entire universe every damn week, they use humor as a coping mechanism, usually dark and inappropriate humor.

So IMHO the show's lack of humor not only made it less fun to watch, and made the characters a bit less likeable and less people I could identify with, but it also took the edge off of some of the more suspenseful situations, made everyone just a bit less human and believable. Now I don't mean I wished Picard was cracking jokes, Picard's lack of humor is totally believable and acceptable, he's the captain who never lets himself unclench for a single solitary moment. But Riker being the only person in the large ensemble cast who had a sense of humor? That just isn't believable!

And that's one of the many reasons I liked Reg, he brought some laughs.

reply

For Dwight Shultz to appear the producers probably had to have a very substantial story ready to get his commitment. If he indicated that he would appear for a few minutes in a half dozen episodes each per season I don't doubt that the producers would readily agree to that. I would imagine that story approval mattered to get actors such as James Sloyan and Malachi Throne to appear. We as fans tend to think that an actor's career is entirely based on television and film but the reality is quite a number devote time to the stage plus theater and enjoy it. That the craft comes first and the money second.

reply

He was a real ladies man with Deanna.

reply