80s mandatory sex scene


What happened to them? Where have they been in the past decades?
They were great!

I hated them as a kid, they were cringeworthy, out of place, exploitative.
They were ubiquitus in movies that had little to do with love or sex, like action or horror flicks.

In reality they added an extra element to the experience, making it more human and mature, and also more female friendly and maybe more juvenile. I guess American puritanism prevailed, so idiotic moms feel safer now that their kid watches 2 hours of shooting but God forbid he takes a glance of a pair of tits for 2 seconds. It's been a bigot virtuewashing for the worse.

I miss them, enough neutered cartoons for dickless boys, Hollywood bring em back!

reply

Don't you know that heterosexual love scenes are a tool of the oppressive hetero-normative misogynistic racist regime? What are you, a Trump voter, or maybe one of those free thinkers?

reply

Good response. Remember, though, the close-minded actually think THEY are the free thinkers, so they would never equate Trump voters with free thinkers (remember, they act like they're in a cult, and accuse Trump voters of being in a cult; they claim they are anti-fascist while being complete fascists, and they claim they are anti-racist when they are the biggest racists on the planet).

reply

Yeah, I just threw that in at the end to make my sarcasm obvious. Good observations.

reply

Oh, my fault.

reply

nah, no worries. I appreciate the response.

reply

It is funny. Them having sex is central to the plot. Most sex scenes in movies aren't though. Like James Bond movies for instance. Actually that would be a messed up but funny way to end the series. If I were a billionaire I would so produce a James Bond movie where at the very end Bond is making out with some woman he had saved in the movie and they haven't started sex yet. Then suddenly a bunch of teenage boys and girls barge in claiming to be all his sons and daughters that he's had over the years with the women he's had sex with. And demanding he be apart of their lives. And then the love interest gets all mad at finding this out and leaves. Then he's sitting there going, "What in God's name have I done!?"

reply

Sex scenes are as central as ANY other action. Why do we need to see every detail of a car chase, fight or shootout? We can just cut to the end, or to the next scene (like the bad guy apprehended, or a funeral).

Anyway, your scene is funny, but with all that fucking + his training wouldnt Bond know how to avoid accidents?

reply

Probably. I was just thinking him simply having sex with a woman only for the next movie to not even mention said woman makes it always feel pointless to me.

reply

Pointless? That's the whole point there, he's a dick with a gun, he shoots then runs.
He's banging the hot chick to celebrate his victory, not because he's in it for the long term.
He's not gonna stick around any longer to raise a family or spend some quality time together, he's as serious as Austin Powers. Only less honest.

reply

Yeah. I get you but that's why I am a bit biased against the series. I like it a bit but even aside from that they rarely mention anything that happened the previous movie. It's not as much fun as other movie series.

reply

I know, but they had a formula and it's the most successful series in movie history, so I think they did something right. Having little connections to previous titles allows them to be free and the viewer to be less invested. You just need to know who's Bond, M, and Q.
And that they are the good guys.
That's why the bond girls are good enough for one movie only: the character is the same, and he's single and ready to mingle. It would be weird (and certainly more interesting, but this is a series not for the brightest ones) if Bond had a steady GF or a wife and he had to fuck some Russian spy for work. Or if they had to explain every time what happened to his previously banged bond girl.
Mission Impossible keeps a semblance of storyline. Isn't that even stupider, with the stupid explainations of Ethan's private life they give us?

reply

Ehhh, it depends.

In romance films, the sex is oftentimes shown as a way of these characters culminating their emotions into something physically intimate after having established an intellectual, emotional, or physically bond. When done right, it feels like a pay off or reward for investing in the characters' relationship.

For action films, the name says it all. We're there to witness the actions take place. Oftentimes wanting to see how characters resolve situations and get in and out of scenarios using said actions. The sex is oftentimes there as a gratuity, since it usually doesn't serve a purpose other than titillation (except in Terminator's case, since it was a vital plot point and a payoff as well to the previously established story elements). We see the car chases because we need to know if someone lives or dies, the same with a fight scene. If it just cuts to the end then we're left asking "How did such and such die? Why is such and such still alive?" In an action film, the actions help explain what the outcome of the story will be.

This isn't to say sex scenes have no place in action films, in the same way that it isn't to say that action scenes have no place in dramas. It's all about context, execution, and whether the scenes are there to entertain, inform, or enlighten. If the sex scene isn't really entertaining, then maybe it's there to inform, or to enlighten (like in the film The Sessions). If it can't accomplish any of the three and doesn't really move the plot along, then it makes sense why it shouldn't appear.

Most sex scenes in 1980s action films were at least entertaining and the women were really hot back then, so it had a multi-fold payoff. A lot of chicks these days cast in Hollywood flicks aren't all that hot, and it's rare that many of them are worth seeing in the buff the way actresses were back in the day. Of course, this mostly applies to heterosexual sex scenes as Hollyweird has an agenda for going above par the Rainbow Reich

reply

pppl had more fun in the 80s

reply

They certainly did compared to 2020.....

reply

speak for yourself.
i'm getting a lot more action than teenage me did in the 80s! :)

reply

Yeah, all that sweet covid action! mmmmm, you are da man!

reply

Yeah. Nobody is ever going to replace Stallone and Schwarzenegger.

reply

Feminism is the reason. It is the new puritanism. Only female oriented and gay sex is allowed now.

Also, the cinema became more about making movies for kids (cartoons, CGI tests, comic book movies and such).

But back to terminator, isn't the sex seen important? It's what makes Kyle Reese into John Connor's father...

reply

Yes it's important.
Like many other sex scenes, shown in the movie or not.
If it came out today, they would just cut to the next day after the first kiss.
Still John's father. Sex scene is not in the movie.

I'm saying it's shit that NOWADAYS they ALWAYS leave the sex scene out.

reply

I'm glad they're (mostly) gone. Boring, added nothing to the plot, usually uncomfortable if watched in company, or embarrassing (for the movie) if watched alone.

reply

That was my take when I was a kid too, and they were very common.

Now that everything is disney, I can see how it's worse, not better.
Imagine if that giant turd ironman rised its childish tone with an appropriate sex scene with Pepper. God forbid!

reply

"added nothing to the plot", eh depends on the movie. The original Hellraiser has a very strong sex scene which was vital to the plot because the story wouldn't lead to where it was going without it. The sex scenes in The Fly(1986) were important to the ending of the film as well.

reply

Fifty Shades of Grey trilogy had a lot of sex scenes in them and those are very recent but granted those aren't horror/sci fi films. One of the Twilight films had a sex scene as well.

reply

The sex scene actually had some bearing on the plot so it wasn't unnecessary.

reply

My god the amount of repressed prudes in this thread is laughable.

reply

Yeah, it's mind boggling.
Not only that, most people here try to "justify" the sex scenes by saying "it was part of the plot, HENCE it's ok. Otherwise it is no no". Wtf...

I'm arguing that these scenes were about sex, showing as much as possible for the sake of a good, hot sexy minute, and that that was good, as it added a layer to these movies. A layer that is sorely lacking from the neutered, infantile, prudish, bigot disney crap from this century.

reply