MovieChat Forums > Jaws (1975) Discussion > The forgotten death

The forgotten death


Tippet Pipit, the happy black Labrador Retriever.

Most people seem to get more upset by animal deaths than fellow humans. You yell "that shark ate some guy!" and people go "huh...wha?" You yell "that shark ate my dog!" and you've got a panic on your hands at the ASPCA and The Humane Society.

reply

I always thought the dog was called 'pippet' (perhaps I'm wrong?) But either way, I agree with your assessment.

reply

Yeah, I'm not sure exactly what the name was of that ill-fated hound. I was going by the subtitles on a copy I have, but those are often wildly off.

reply

Either way, it's owner (that day) should have re-named it 'Lunch'

reply

It was definitely called "Tippet(t?)". Named after the British composer Michael Tippett, perhaps? Maybe Spielberg asked John Williams to give the dog a name, and that is what he came up with. Or maybe just a coincidence, although that is a fairly odd name to give a dog.

reply

Exact spelling is Pipit per the dog's owner.

reply

I checked an online version of the script and it's indeed Pipit. I also read that the dog's owners were the "Potter" family. The amateur who played Pipit's stick chucker was Stephen Potter.

reply

Why does everyone believe that Pippet fell prey to the shark?

Animals have a keen sense of impending danger; for example, they get skittish before earthquakes and storms. A few years ago, an adult bear was spotted in the neighborhood where my friend and his wife lived. They personally didn't see the bear, but their two dogs were spooked and didn't want to go for their walks. After the police shot the bear, the dogs were back to their normal behavior.

After Pippet's owner tossed that stick into the ocean that last time, I can imagine Pippet thinking, "Uh-oh, there's something creepy in that water. See you later, stick; I'm outta here ..." I think it's quite plausible that Pippet just ran off somewhere, and later came out to join his (her?) owner when the danger was over.

The stick floating in the water while Pippet is no where around still effectively foreshadows the impending menace of the shark; only I would add that this menace was clear to Pippet in ways that humans can't intuit, thus causing him (her?) to take cover.

reply

It was the shark.

reply

[deleted]

Let's be honest here. That dog would have probably met its' demise by car or something if the shark hadn't got it. That owner just wasn't watching the dog.

reply

The stick floating was the very clear confirmation that the shark got him.

reply

No, it was the very clear confirmation of the sharkโ€™s impending arrival, causing Pippet to abandon the game of fetch.

The floating stick is no less a chilling foreboding of peril even if Pippet survives. Pippetโ€™s animal instincts kicked in, thus saving him/her. Unfortunately for us humans, we donโ€™t possess that sixth sense. Danger was lurking for the beach goers of Amity.

reply

Some say Pippet was so shook up by the floating stick incident that he/she took refuge with a new family on the beach, and lived in happiness to a ripe old age.

reply

No, that's just a fantasy that people choose to believe. If the dog survived, they would've had a scene later of it bounding into it's owners arms eventually.

reply

If the dog survived, they would've had a scene later of it bounding into it's owners arms eventually.


Not necessarily. That would undermine the tension that the Kintner beach scene was trying to convey: the push-pull of dread (Chief Brodyโ€™s nervous watchfulness because he knows something the island visitors donโ€™t) and the obliviousness of the beach frolickers. The tension breaks when Brodyโ€™s fears are confirmed and everyone experiences the shark-induced panic. A dog with a wagging tail reunited with its owner doesnโ€™t fit the tone.

I think Pippetโ€™s fate is deliberately meant to be unresolved because much of Jaws (especially the early scenes when the shark is unseen) is about viewers letting their imaginations fill in the blanks regarding the terror. We can apply our own interpretation to Pippetโ€™s fate. I just choose to interpret that Pippet escaped based on what Iโ€™ve observed/read about pet behaviour. To me, it doesnโ€™t make the shark any less terrifying.

reply

If the dog survived, they would've had a scene later of it bounding into it's owners arms eventually.

As in after they caught the first shark.
I just choose to interpret that Pippet escaped

Like I said, fantasy.
I think Pippetโ€™s fate is deliberately meant to be unresolved

Pipts's fate isn't unresolved because most people can grasp that the shark got him.

reply

Sure, I can grasp that the shark may have gotten him; but itโ€™s also not beyond the realm of possibility that the dog was spooked and would not go into the water. It would be fantasy if Pippet sprouted wings and flew off into a pink cloud. But running off because he had an animalโ€™s instinct for danger? Perfectly possible and plausible.

reply

If the dog survived, they would've had a scene later of it bounding into it's owners arms eventually.


No, because the film makers wanted Pippetโ€™s fate to be left to the viewerโ€™s interpretation. They gave neither a happy ending nor a sad ending to his/her screen time. It leaves the viewer somewhat unsettled, which is part of the filmโ€™s atmosphere.

reply

but itโ€™s also not beyond the realm of possibility that the dog was spooked and would not go into the water.

Ohhhhhhhh... so the dog didn't go in the water?? Ohhhhhhhh. Smh... welp, I'm done here. You stay in your little fantasy. K-bye. ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ

reply

Of course the dog went into the water; who says he didnโ€™t? But after a few fetches, he sensed danger and wouldnโ€™t go in again.

Thatโ€™s what I want to think anyway. I just canโ€™t accept the thought of poor Pippet becoming a shark snack when itโ€™s entirely possible that his instincts saved him.

reply

Your bias is clouding your judgement.

reply

Pipit's disappearance wasn't because he fled out of fear. It wasn't any boating accident. It wasn't any propeller. It wasn't any coral reef. And it wasn't Jack the Ripper. It was a shark!

reply

Mr. Ccr, what we are dealing with here is a perfect engine, er... an eating machine. It's really a miracle of evolution. All Pipit does is swim and eat and make little Pipits and that's all.

reply

Love to prove that wouldn't you? Get your picture on the cover of Dogster magazine...

reply

If we make an effort now we might be able to save August!

reply

I just found out that a cat got killed here last week. And you knew it. you knew there was a shark out there. you knew it was dangerous and you let people go swimming anyway. you knew all those things... but still my dog is dead now. And there is nothing you can do about it.

My dog is dead. I wanted you to know that.

reply

I donโ€™t care, Lady. I drink too much, let my kids play on dangerous swing sets and I frequently put zinc oxide on my nose. Ok?

reply

"Animals have a keen sense of impending danger; for example, they get skittish before earthquakes and storms."

I'm guessing you've never seen a nature show. Animals eat other animals all the time and while there's always a struggle between predator and prey, there's no reason that a dog in the water would not be vulnerable to a shark, especially THIS shark.

If your assertion were true that "animals have a keen sense of impending danger" with the implication that this is evidence the dog survived, then no predator would ever catch any prey and the entire food chain would collapse.

Yes, animals can sense danger. No, that doesn't indicate in any way that the dog would have survived.

reply

If your assertion were true that "animals have a keen sense of impending danger" with the implication that this is evidence the dog survived, then no predator would ever catch any prey and the entire food chain would collapse.

You missed one important point: My assumption is that Pippet didnโ€™t go into the water after the last toss of the stick. He stayed on land where he was less vulnerable and where the danger lurking in the ocean couldnโ€™t get to him.

Not every stalked/hunted animal gets killed. They use their natural defenses and their instincts to evade capture. If your premise is that this never works, then every โ€œlow on the food chainโ€ species would be extinct due to its predators.

I assume, however, that such a simplistic statement is not your premise, in which case we are back at the same point: the possibility that Pippet survived. Iโ€™m not saying itโ€™s a certainty, but itโ€™s not beyond belief either, especially based on my assumption that Pippet avoided the water in the middle of the fetch game.

I guess weโ€™ll have to agree to disagree: Youโ€™re in favour of one possibility while Iโ€™m in favour of the other.

reply

The movie does seem to imply that the shark took the dog. If he was spooked, he would have run back to his owner.

reply

Tippet, as you know, means friendship.

reply

A what?

reply

I heard "Tippet" is slang for a subtitle maker who's high, or a waiter.

reply

Mayor Vaughan, will you close the beaches?

reply

I don't recall the shark killing a dog. And the scene doesn't even make sense since dogs don't live in the ocean

reply

Why don't you go over and sit at the kiddie table, and let the adults talk? ๐Ÿ™„

reply

So go ahead and tell me about this dog that lives and swims in the ocean. I'll listen all the way from the kiddie table

reply

It's very simple... Before the Kitner kid was killed, a man was seen playing catch with his dog in the surf. Then, the dog disappeared.

You're trolling, and I am feeding you.

Or, maybe it was a "plot hole." ๐Ÿ™„

reply

Feeder ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚

reply

Ok, thanks. I don't recall the scene but its be a while since I watched this. Usually I put on parts 3 and 4 if I'm in the mood for Jaws

reply

Give Cruel Jaws (1995) a viewing.

reply

You could have asked your IMAGINARY "professor." ๐Ÿ™„

reply

I see what you did thereโ€ฆ and I love you for it lol

reply

Pipit was definitely eaten by the shark. He was probably swallowed whole. I believe Spielberg has addressed this before.

reply

Stick floating is a huge indicator the dog was eaten. Otherwise, why show it floating in the water? Why show the dog at all? It's a clear foreshadowing that the shark is there.

reply

When the boy was attacked by the shark, EVERYONE knew. It was horrific. Sure the dog was a bit smaller than the boy but the same scene would have happened. All we see is a stick floating. I doubt the dog would have dove deep and been gulped while fetching a stick. It's all fiction and they leave it up to our imaginations. If people choose to believe the dog was eaten alive, so be it. I personally believe the dog steered clear.

reply

Yes! We think alike ^

reply

Plot twist - Pipet ate Alex Kintner at the beach.

reply