MovieChat Forums > Jaws (1975) Discussion > Why the shark didn't kill Hooper, but di...

Why the shark didn't kill Hooper, but did kill Quint and tried to kill Brody


https://www.reddit.com/r/FanTheories/comments/66stwg/jaws_why_the_shark_didnt_kill_hooper_but_did_kill/

The shark, or Bruce, is obviously not a normal great white. He's much larger and much more intelligent. If my theories right, Bruce is much smarter than it seems.

In one scene on the boat, after Quint has harpooned 2 buoyancy barrels onto the shark, he is hold rope when it is ragged out of his hands causing such bad rope burn, he bleeds. His hands are hanging over the side of the boat when this happens so it is fair to presume some blood fell into the water. Common knowledge, sharks can sense blood in the water from a few miles away, so if Bruce is a super smart shark and he's so close by at all times he maybe be able to recognize the smell of the blood and link it to Quint.

Considering the shark was willing to kill anything in its vicinity, provoked or not, isn't it unusual it went through the trouble of smashing up the shark cage which contained Hooper, and then ignore his body? He would have had an easy meal right there, but he ignored him and Hooper was able to hide from the shark long enough to surface after it was killed.

Bruce didn't want to kill Hooper because Hooper didn't try to kill it. Although the small harpoons were used before Quints rope burn, the shark may have been smart enough to link the attacks with Quints blood.

Now, say it's nothing to do with blood but with the literal attacks. Quint harpooned him 3 times, and eventually Brody shot him with his own gun a few times before the final scene with the rifle (idk what gun it was, I'm prolly wrong there). In the sharks eyes, Quint was an enemy from the beginning of the boating scene and Brody eventually became an enemy. Before the last 30 or so minutes of the film, when they're on the Orca, the shark doesn't purposely go for anyone in particular: The girl in the beginning was simply the only thing in the water to eat The little boy, Alex, looked like a seal because of his lilo - similar accidents happen to surfers irl The two men on the peer were fishing - fish were easier to eat if hurt by hooks and this is likely when the shark took a real notice of humans, as it was dragging the peer away but turned around to chase the helpless Charlie swimming back to shore The man in the boat is the only other one I have trouble figuring out. This was after the peer incident so maybe the shark did because aware of humans and tried its luck

TL;DR: Hooper never hurt the shark, so it didn't bother killing him even when he was easy to kill. Quint injured it several times and it got revenge by eating him, Brody injured it and it attempted to get revenge but failed.

reply

I just thought it was luck of the draw. Bruce probably gave up on Hooper and Quint was in the right place at the right time to be its next meal.

reply

When did the shark have a name

reply

The production crew nicknamed the full-size shark prop Bruce.

reply

This is nonsense, the woman swimmer and the little boy did nothing to the shark and it ate them. The only explanation perhaps why it wouldn't eat Hooper is that it was still full from eating Quint.

reply

It didn't eat Hooper because he escaped to the seabed and was able to hide after the cage got busted. The shark couldn't find him and then just started focusing on the boat again because that became the easier target. The mechanical shark is called Bruce but the shark in the itself movie didn't have a name.

reply

Thanks

reply

Also, Hooper was a shark scientist, and may have known what behaviors attract sharks and what do not, which would have helped him escape it's notice. Although that's a toughie, per Shark Week sharks are drawn to vibration and will attack things that tremble or wiggle, and who could avoid shaking like a leaf when you're in the water with a killer shark?

So no, I don't think the shark was unusually intelligent.

reply

That I didn't know. I know I'm the sequels he's cloned and has some sensors. That may be where the confusion comes from. But you make a complelling case

reply

I think that really they wanted the movie to be a little bit more exciting and to have a feel good ending compared to the book. Hooper dies in the cage in the book, and Quint isn't chomped in glorious shark out of water fashion, he drowns. The guys on the pier though were baiting the shark, not merely fishing.

reply

Also in the book, I seem to remember Hooper having an affair with Brody's wife.

reply

Correct. I think he was her ex's younger brother or something, but it's been a whole lot of years since I've read it. I also think the shark didn't explode. I think that the harpoon wounds got it.

reply

Likewise, it's been decades for me.

reply

Hooper should've died. I don't think Richard Dreyfuss was sympathetic enough to have him survive. The real life footage of the shark attacking an empty cage is no excuse, he could've easily been killed after he escaped the cage.

reply