MovieChat Forums > Fantastic Voyage (1966) Discussion > This movie really should be remade... wh...

This movie really should be remade... who would be a good cast?


With our more indepth knowledge of the human anatomy and the inner wonders and workings of the human body, combined with the nearly infinite possibilities afforded by the advances in special fx, CGI, et al, I think that Fantastic Voyage would be a PRIME candidate for a remake.

I mean, how many old and crummy 70's TV shows can they redo into movies? And for cryin' out loud, we're getting a movie of Fat Albert??? They're talking about a big-screen version of "F Troop"???? They are remaking movies that just came out in the late 70's or 80's... come on, folks, let's take a look at some of the promising SciFi flicks of the 1960's and imagine the possibilities!

Of course, if they were to remake it, I'm sure that Hollywood would probably ruin it anyway. The effects would be great but they'd put in somebody like Reese Witherspoon or (shudder) Jennifer Lopez to play the role of Cora Peterson. Vin Diesel would be Grant... or maybe Keanu Reeves. (Major shudder)

Who do you think would be a good cast?

reply


Your intentions are great, this movie is overlooked as a gem of 60's Sci-Fi. But I don't see a remake as being necessary. Granted remakes are hardly ever necessary unless the director is taking us in a completely different direction. One example of that would Scorsese's remake of "Cape Fear". According to an interview he did at the time he said he like the first version of "Cape Fear" but he felt the family in the movie was far too innocent and goodie-goodie, he wanted there to be conflict within the family. While I didn't enjoy his vision, I appreciated his effort and saw that he wasn't just retelling the story with a current group of actors, he was really telling the story with a whole new dramatic twist. So a remake was justified for him.

Being a big fan of "Fantastic Voyage" I don't know what else could be done to make it really better. Of course CGI would be employed to improve the effects, but frankly I think the visuals in this movie are very beautiful and making them more realistic wouldn't make them better. Even the effects for "Inner Space" were probably more realistic of human body internals than this movie, but they weren't beautiful to look at.

As for the plot, I'm sure some juggling of the roles to make the bad guy into a bad girl, or make the hero a black guy or make the good doctor blind or some other gimmick could be dreamed up but again it wouldn't make it better.

And doing a remake of any movie just to plug in current actors is a waste of time to me. So I guess for there to be a remake of "Fantastic Voyage" that I would want to see it would have to be done by a director who really had a vision going off in a completely different direction. I don't know what that is but then I'm not the creative sort, so who knows.

As for the science in this movie, of course there's the issue of the mass not being reduced and thus the sub would still weigh tons and crush the floor tiles. But I read one solution to this would be for the entire lab to be in outer space and thus with no gravity to worry about you just have to keep the velocities down to avoid any problems with mass. I agree this is pretty farfetched but it's better than Asimov's idea about reducing Planck's Constant. "Hey Isaac, that's why the call it a CONSTANT, it can't be changed, man."

tmw

reply

the movie was redmade. remember inner space? ok it wasnt a straight remake but it was the same idea

reply

dude! right on! that's what I was thinking! I mean, they are remaking all the other famous movies, so now they should redo Fantastic Voyage, with all the new technology! right on man!

reply

Grant - Christian Bale
Cora - Keira Knightley
Dr. Duval - James Brolin
Dr. Michaels - Jeremy Irons
Captain Bill Owens - Cuba Gooding Jr.

What say there, Fussy Britches? Feel like talking?

reply

good choices

reply

They should remake it with Martin Short, Douglas Quaid and... wait a second...

"Darling it's better, down where it's wetter"
- Sebastian

reply

Alot of the sets were designed by UCLA med student's and won an Academy Award for it. So WHY remake??? Well,...the obvious reason's,...$$$$$$CHA-CHING$$$$$$ & Some NUDITY!!! WHOO-HOO!!!

The Smoker You Drink, The Player You Get!

reply

It's DENNIS Quaid.

Way to try to diss "Innerspace"

"Just scratching around for something to believe in. Something to believe in..."

-Aqualung

reply

LOL! I stand corrected. I always make that mistake. It's because Arnie plays a Douglas Quaid in Total Recall.

BTW I wasn't trying to "diss" Innerspace. Just pointing out that a remake of The Fantastic Voyage already exists. Or a reimagining if you like.

Or a rip off.

"Darling it's better, down where it's wetter"
- Sebastian

reply

i beleive there was a remake called Inner Space starring Dennis Quaid

reply


Grant...Tom Hanks

Cora...Helen Hunt

Michaels...Robin Williams

Duvall...Kevin Spacey

Owens...Gary Sinise


I especially like Williams in the role of Dr. Michaels. He has a great touch with both subtle and manic. Although I think the roles of Duvall and Owens could be interchangeable. Just my 2 cents :)

reply

and completely do a Homeopathy job on it and SUCK the entire essence out of it and make it seem like Third world Paranoia garbage... all dark and dank EW.

Ticks Ticks thousands of ticks, and not one blessed TOCK among them!

reply

[deleted]

MOST of the 60's effects hold up far better than todays easy to spot CGI crap.
We can thank Fox's resident SPFX genius LB Abbott for this.
The PROTEUS should be left as is-except maybe digital readouts, keybooards and screens.

The one problem with the film-even if the antibodies 'devour' the ship into pulp, that pulp is still going to grow back into a hulking mess, roughly the mass and size of the original sub, thus exploding the patient.

Issac Asimov was smart enough to write that out of the novel- I beleive the divers 'coaxed' the antibodies that were eating the sub to follow them, and then, as in the film, they were plucked out of the eye in a tear on a glass slide, and all grew back to original size and mass.

reply

The process shots were pretty poor. All those blue lines.

reply

The one problem with the film-even if the antibodies 'devour' the ship into pulp, that pulp is still going to grow back into a hulking mess, roughly the mass and size of the original sub, thus exploding the patient.


That should actually be left in the remake. Maybe as everyone is celebrating that happens...

And would the antibodies grow with the expanding crew or stay microscopic?

reply

"come on, folks, let's take a look at some of the promising SciFi flicks of the 1960's and imagine the possibilities!"

I would rather just watch and enjoy the original flicks. I'm not against remakes as some have been good...but I can't think of any movie that I enjoy and think to myself- "This movie is good, they should remake it." If it did get remade I would go into it with an open mind and I could get lucky and find another The Thing or The Fly, but most likely it would be another Psycho or Planet of the Apes.
Personally I don't think any movie should be remade just so we can see it done with CGI...I'm still more impressed with the effects in the original King Kong than in Peter Jackson's version.


It's dead. We don't eat dead things. -Elizabeth(Spider Baby)

reply

No, this definitely needs to be remade.

reply

Grant - Paul Walker
Cora - Eva Green
Dr. Michaels - Steve Buscemi

reply

Am I the only one who likes the "Apes" remake?!

Personally I don't think any movie should be remade just so we can see it done with CGI...I'm still more impressed with the effects in the original King Kong than in Peter Jackson's version.


Are you serious?

"Just scratching around for something to believe in. Something to believe in..."

-Aqualung

reply

Yes, I am serious. I don't think the CGI in Jackson's version was all that impressive.

Leslie was the one covering people in apple butter.I was just an innocent on-licker

reply