MovieChat Forums > Help! (1965) Discussion > Best-Looking Beatle

Best-Looking Beatle

posted 20 years ago by michelle_mabelle
191 replies | jump to latest

All of them are surprisingly good-looking (surprising cos they're all in the one band, really famous and talented and all)! Well, OK, Ringo maybe not, but he's just so darned adorable! So vote now - the most gorgeous Beatle! And I'll be the vote counter if over five people are bothered to reply to this overtly superficial thread.

I'll say Paul, even though I love John too, cos he's very very very cute.

Could those of you in the cheaper seats clap? And the rest of you just rattle your jewellery

[–] leosblueblanket88 17 years ago

GEORGE!

I want...I want...I WANT EVERYTHING I'VE EVER SEEN IN THE MOVIES!

[–] I_Shall_Be_Released 16 years ago

Yet again George appears to be the most popular beatle...when did that happen?

Anyway, I love these little posts. They can be a lot of fun, so here's my opinion.

George was beautiful. Not many men are beauitful, but George certainly was. He became beautiful around 1965, prior to then he was a bit gawky with the uni-brow and the crooked teeth, which I happen to adore. I think he should have kept the teeth- that silly little smile is all over the place and absoloutly adorable. Check it out:

Gawky/sweet

http://www.bopped.com/copyright/bopped_Beatles_George_Harrison_1964_bi gger_picture.jpg

Beautiful

http://archive.salon.com/people/feature/2001/12/01/harrison_kam/story. jpg

Paul was almost beautiful, but not quite. He was cute during beatlemania, which I thought was rather boring. Then come '67 and he gained sex appeal. I would describe him as handsome or lovely. My favourite in terms of looks- I can't get enough of Paul during 67 and early 68. Then comes let it be and the unfortunate beard. It was very odd and did not suit his baby-face. In fact it was kind of creepy. The mullet was also a very poor choice. I don't mean to be rude, but now he kind of reminds me of one of those droopy dogs. Sorry, that was quite mean

Handsome

http://abeautifulmess.typepad.com/my_weblog/images/2007/09/26/paul_mcc artney_344x481.jpg

Unfortunate

http://home.att.net/~chuckayoub/Paul_McCartney_Biography.jpg

Dog-like (sorry Paul, I'd still do ya )

http://www.smh.com.au/ffximage/2008/02/26/paul_mccartney_narrowweb__30 0x365,0.jpg

John was hot, sexy, unique, but I wouldn't describe him as beautiful (well a little) or handsome. HOT describes Mr. Lennon. The jeasus beard (and H) were his downfall. But we can still reflect on better times:

Oooh baby...*faints*

http://www.geocities.com/~Beatleboy1/c59.jpg

Hilarious,if not a little creepy. I'd describe this look as...'festive'

http://i161.photobucket.com/albums/t229/razoryan66/JohnLennon.jpg

Ringo was never hot, beautiful, handsome- but he was always endearing. Now he's cool. Here's a nice pic for fun

Endearing

http://timesonline.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/ringo_starr.jpg

Cool Monkey

http://www.showclix.com/event_pictures/Ringo-Starr.jpg

Rock stars. Is there anything they don't know?

[–] leosblueblanket88 16 years ago

I agree that he should have kept the teeth. I find imperfect teeth kind of sexy.

I want...I want...I WANT EVERYTHING I'VE EVER SEEN IN THE MOVIES!

[–] tpureti 16 years ago

Ugh! I can't choose between the *beep* Beatles! They were also so hot, and they all had their peaks of hottness. I'm gonna have to analyze here and then maybe I could decide. Most like I won't be able to anyway. Let's start with Paulie.

Paul: The Cute One. He was just the cutest thing back then. He stayed sexy from '64 to '67ish all the way. Big droopy eyes are killer. Plus, I think he was the fittest out of all the rest of the Bealtes. Definitely. His voice is sweet and... I'd do Paulie in a heart beat. So... um, Paul was the cutest and most huggable.

John: John... one *beep* word to descibe him is: Hott. Really hot. That's all that fits him. Very appealing, and a great songwriter/singer. I think he was best from '64-'66. Definitely. I miss him so much.

George: Gorgeous man. I loved how he was very striking. Love his eyebrows and teeth(he's got vampire teeth too), and he's a tad skinny, but that's how he was built. I love how he loved India also, it's a great feeling for me. He was handsome.

Ringo: Love Ringo, he's sweet, funny, and just plain awesome. Though he is the least attractive at first sight, he's just too lovable to ignore.

So, really, they are all sexy. But I think I'll have to go with Paul... no John! Or.. wait.. Georgie is.. ugh. Nevermind. Can't choose, sorry.

[–] 16 years ago

[deleted]

[–] sofaoutside 16 years ago

GEORGE GEORGE GEORGE GEORGE WHOOPS GEORGE WHOOPS GEORGE GEORGE!!!!

During "youve got to hide your love away" he acts as though he is jealous with Paul winking at Ahme, and gives her a dirty look, he is utterly gorgeously sexy beyond belief, i could explode!!!

Its a thingy!...a fiendish thingy!

[–] horrorchick5 16 years ago

george is amazing i love him. or when there in the bathroom for the 4th attempt to get the ring. and the blow dryer rips off george's shirt rawr.

[–] ImagineLuv 16 years ago

Its always been John for me.

Love is you
You and me
Love is knowing
we can be

[–] gwoman23 16 years ago

I thought it was brilliant too. And he's really cute when he covers himself inmediately. Though John is my favorite, George is my second favorite. I think he had a latin lover look that made him really attractive

John Lennon (1940-1980)
You'll never be gone for us

[–] ImagineLuv 16 years ago

George is def the second best looking, I love that wicked grin he would flash.

Love is you
You and me
Love is knowing
we can be

[–] SamandDeansgirl 16 years ago

This is a hard question! They are all so fricken cute and gorgeous! Hmm.... okay.... well John is.... well he's John and he's very good-looking.... as is George and Paul has the boyish face and Ringo is the cutest thing i've ever seen!

so.... John/George, then Paul and then cute little Ringo!

RIP River Phoenix-Brad Renfro-Heath Ledger
Strawberry Gusher

[–] nekoshoujo4805 16 years ago

I've always liked Ringo since he just so damn adorable.
But George was FREAKING HAWT!!! Especially that part where that thing in the restroom is pulling at them; George just walks in obliviously and his shirt suddenly gets ripped off. Lol, and when that seen is done he quickly covers up! ^o^

[–] saynotoRIC 16 years ago

I can't remember if I've replied in this thread yet, and I'm not reading through all the pages to see. So here we go, possibly again ;-)

I think the Beatles are cutest in the order of Ringo, Paul, John, and George.

Just watch this video of Ringo and Paul clips and tell me they are not just totally lovable. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6HIzlO4H00k

Funny story, my two year old daughter can now recognize each of the Beatles on my Let It Be magnet. For some strange reason though, she always calls John "mama". For the record, he looks nothing like me. There's just some feminine about him to a two year old. ROFL.

[–] gljbradley 15 years ago

LOL!!! Awww! Calling John 'Mama'? LOL!!! That's so adorable, saynoto! Your two year old is a little Beatle Fan!

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] nostawyn 16 years ago

I can't choose! I thought that maybe reading the thread would help, but no such luck. They take turns being my favorite in different "eras". So, in no particular order:

John (pre-heroin)= The sexiest. I would soooo do him.
Paul (sans beard)= The prettiest. He was almost girlishly pretty back in the day. Just look at those eyelashes!
George (pretty much whenever) = The most beautiful. Paul might be pretty, but George was always utterly beautiful.
Ringo (again, pretty much anytime) = The most adorable. I just love him!

-------------------------
"I like your Christ. I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ." --Mahatma Gandhi

[–] calico_skies 16 years ago

John, def. Then George. Paul and Ringo are just freakin cute.

[–] googirl925 16 years ago

I don't replying to this thread? I swear I did? I admit though I didn't really all the pages- it's over 15 pages (from my settings) and I'm too lazy (that people think I'm crazy...I'm only sleeping)

I don't have a favorite but...

John: drop dead gorgeous when he was WITHOUT Yoko. From 1940-1967 and 1974 he looked healthy, he looked fit, he looked happy even, AND, most important of all, he makes me smile all giddy

Paul: he's good looking however I really like looking at him in 1967

George: he was at his prime in 1968, his hair wasn't too long nor too short, it was just right!

Ringo: hmmmm well...I guess in 1965? He's a good looking man, I love his blue eyes (like me!)

[–] deniseactress 16 years ago

in this film ...george.

Zachary Quinto is ridiculously sexy!