Marilyn Monroe has been regarded as the (or among the) most beautiful women in the world that ever lived. Personally, I don't see why... other than she was a sex symbol helped her elevate herself into the dreams of men everywhere. Maybe it's down to our changing times. I, personally, thought that the other young blond actress was far more attractive than Monroe. I just don't understand what people saw in Monroe, but I guess that what one considers beauty changes with each generation.
I find Marilyn to be quiet androgynous... next to the little busstop waitress (in the scene on the bus when they're talking together on the way back to the busstop) she looks almost like a dragqueen! I actually think that's why so many people loved her (and still do): It's the true meaning of Universality!(and maybe most human beings are a little bisexual deep down inside...?)
I find your comment a bit hard to believe, considering it's one of the most famously feminine people you're talking about. She had soft, girlish features and a very womanly body.
I think she's beautiful but not the most beautiful to me or the type that I would use the phrase "drop dead gorgeous", in my opinion Liv Tyler is the most beautiful. Yes different eras, but I prefer Liv Tyler, she looks just like an angel!
^ I agree. Not only do I think she's absolutely gorgeous, but I truly believe she was a kind-hearted, gentle, compassionate woman that just wanted to make something of herself. In fact, like people have stated, she soon grew tired of all the praise and exultation concerning her looks. She wanted to be esteemed for her acting ability and not her looks alone. People were too quick to typecast her in the dumb blonde roles and thus, people were hasty to give her that label and nothing else. I've read a lot about her and I believe that it's not only her features that make her attractive but her personality. She was just a beautiful person all around. And it disgusts me to hear people like Paris Hilton say they admire Marilyn or even have the audacity to COMPARE themselves to her. There will never be another Marilyn Monroe and no one in Hollywood compares to her.
In my opinion, she is the ideal of what beauty is. Especially as Norma Jean, her face was that of an angel! I could look at pictures of her all night and day! She was truly a gorgeous lady, with or without makeup. The pics of her without makeup are very telling indeed of whether she was a natural beauty, or just done up for the cameras.
For me MM is the most beautiful woman in the world. It's not just her sexy ways or her beautiful face but it's the magic in her eyes. When she's playing "sad" or "happy" or "in love" the emotion she shows in her eyes is breathtaking and no actress in Hollywood can come close to that these days.
Beauty... it's difficult to know how 'beautiful' any actress was or is, including Marilyn Monroe, because so many of them had plastic surgery, including Marilyn (who at the very least, had a nose job). Since none of us knew Marilyn, personally, we don't know what she was like in her real life, only in her roles. I have seen several acting 'stars' up close and personal (because I am a writer and occasionally a screenplay editor)... none of them have lived up to the hype. I was 2 feet away from Goldie Hawn when she was filming 'Bird on a Wire' (1989). She was so damned old looking, then, up close. Wrinkled hands, obviously just 'scrubbed' face (face lift). Plumped lips. Fake breasts (I think). Goldie was NOT beautiful.
I saw Shirley MacClaine in 1984 at a book convention in L.A. She was 'supposedly' 50 then, but man! she looked at LEAST 65. Heavy makeup, lots of face powder. VERY wrinkled neck and hands. In other words, in 1984, Shirley MacClaine 'looked her age'. But she wasn't beautiful.
Jack Nicholson up close and personal is, well, SHORT, and wrinkled and bald and not good looking. I saw him at a party in the company of Gomer Pyle... err, Jim Nabors. I would not have recognized Jim Nabors, my friend recognized him. This was circa 1993-4. Jim Nabors was so old-looking (wrinkled) that he was like a caricature of himself.
What we see on the screen is two-dimensional representations of someone. If that someone is photogenic, then he or she may appear to be handsome or beautiful when, in real life, you'd pass them on the street and not know them.
The only person I've ever met (stood close to / shook hand of) was President Clinton when he was new to his presidency. I didn't vote for him. I don't like him or his wife. But up close and personal? The man was damned fine looking, just like his picture and he truly EXUDED sexual energy. I was quite nonplussed at my sexual response to him, since I don't like him, but I sure did want to boff him!
So why do we think actors are 'beautiful'? We don't know if they are 'beautiful'. We can believe certain of their acted characters are 'beautiful', perhaps, Life is a journey not a destination. Fear nothing.
If you really want a good look at Marilyn's beauty, this movie is not what you should base it off of. Like someone earlier said, her looks fit her character. She looked pale, and her facial features seemed more severe, like a pretty girl who has had a tough time.
There are so many different types of beautifuls out there, and Marilyn just exudes the drop dead gorgeous blonde. You may not be able to see it here, but in other movies its practically undeniable, whether you like her or not.
I've seen all the pics of the young Marilyn before she perfected her signature look, and I would say she was pretty or cute at most. Certainly she had a photogenic face with symmetrical features, but I don't think she was ever the most beautiful woman. She knew how to use everything she had to work the camera. She even said, "I can make my face do anything". There were times you could see through the facade and see that she was quite regular looking when she wasn't trying to project for cameras. And sometimes she looked too made up her face almost appeared ghost-like or a mask, almost unreal. I actually think she looked more appealing in her less glamorous films like the Misfits and candid pictures where she doesn't seem so acutely aware of the camera.
Beauty, or rather the perception of beauty, is a thing that does indeed change through time. And very often it's not even what we see as beauty but what media dictates. Yesterday it was the round, voluptuous 'sweater girls", or leggy pinups - today it's more trim, streamline or athletic types - somewhere in there was the emaciated "Twiggy" style and so on and so on... Marilyn was indeed a stunning woman, but she was also one who exuded a certain sexuality that more than compensated for whatever she lacked in true beauty. Elizabeth Taylor, in my opinion, was truly a beautiful woman. One has only to see the pictures of her in her prime. One look at that face and eyes tells the tale. And while she herself certainly had a great deal of sexuality, there was something even more compelling about Marilyn. For me there's nothing quite so wonderful and sexy as Marilyn in those blue jeans in "River Of No Return."
Marilyn was an extremely gorgeous and sexy woman who happened to be a very bad actress and worst singer/dancer. Anyway she was a gift for every men eyes. The perfect definition of the word: Ravishing!
In some ways, I agree with the original poster. Marilyn can looks sort of odd in movies - she had a big head and face (as do many big movie stars), and while she had a great body, in some movies she's definitely pretty chubby. At one stage of her career she also did that weird and irritating over-enunciating thing that twisted up her mouth. Conversely, in pictures, she's just the most beautiful woman I've ever seen - she looks like she's lit from within. But the main thing is that her physical looks are only half the equation. She did something with her eyes that made them sparkle in a way I haven't seen in any other person. She conveyed a totally unique combination of complete vulnerability, innocence/experience, and sweetness, with a sexiness that she manages to make it appear she's not even aware of. By comparison, other actresses before and since seem both hard and one-dimensional. Another posted provided links to pictures of her and remakes with Madonna - if those don't highlight her unique beauty, nothing does. She looks like a complex, brilliant diamond, while Madonna looks like a flat piece of cheap glass in comparison (bad, but typically arrogant, move on Madonna's part to even attempt it).
"I, personally, thought that the other young blond actress was far more attractive than Monroe."
In this particular film, I would agree - Monroe looked extremely pale and wan in this movie (although, apparently, this was deliberately done so that she would resemble Beau's idea of an "angel".)
As one of the all-time great beauties, I would not generally rank Monroe on the same tier as Elizabeth Taylor, Vivien Leigh, Grace Kelly, Ava Gardner, Greta Garbo or Gene Tierney but, she did possess truly stunning physical attributes and exuded a magnetic sex appeal (check out "The Seven-Year Itch").
Oh what is the freaking big deal about Grace Kelly, seriously? I can't recall a single outstandingly interesting feature on her. There's no discernible reason for rating her ahead of Marilyn as a beauty.