It’s been released about 10 times in the USA alone. Right now (12/25/2021), the movie is still airing in some theaters in Manhattan, such as IPIC Theaters.
In its initial run (~1939-1943ish), the movie pulled about $500 million adjusted for inflation. The many re-releases over the decades gave the film an extra $2.8 billion.
I've always assumed that - how could it not be. It was the biggest film of it's time when everyone went to the cinema. It's been released several time, used to be a big TV event and I bet the DVDs still sell well.
I do wish people would stop putting such an emphasis on "moneymaking."
It shows your advice is based on avarice and nothing to do with entertainment let alone artistic merit.
And with todays marketing practices, I would be more ashamed to say I fell victim to them rather than admit I gave some my time, or money.
I don't believe I do personally but - two part answer:
It does bug me when studios make their unadjusted claims which are then unthinkingly accepted and echoed.
Also, it's a little bit interesting watching how successful, or not, the big money franchise films are working out.
"I mean - why the hell would you not adjust for inflation?"
Because there's no way to do it accurately; there are far too many variables. A better metric is the number of tickets sold, though that isn't perfect either, because it doesn't take into account the state of the economy at different periods of time, theater accessibility, and the relative price of a movie ticket.
I've never seen any disclaimers on those online inflation calculators saying
"no way to do it accurately; there are far too many variables"
Sure its not an exact science but I would think it would be fairly easy to get a very very accurate picture , by looking at the prices of gold , houses , bread , wine ... whatever
and wages.
..much more easily than trying to work out how many cine tickets got sold
"I've never seen any disclaimers on those online inflation calculators saying
"no way to do it accurately; there are far too many variables""
Well now you know.
"Sure its not an exact science but I would think it would be fairly easy to get a very very accurate picture , by looking at the prices of gold , houses , bread , wine ... whatever
and wages."
Not even close. As one example, did you know that the average price of gasoline was slightly cheaper in 1999 than it was in 1980?
Look at bicycles. Even though the price of high quality ones is through the roof now, the price of entry level ones is still around $100 or less, the same as it has been for my whole life (nearly 50 years).
Some things get cheaper, some things get more expensive, and some things stay about the same price. On top of that, in order to come up with an accurate inflation calculator, you would have to somehow be able to assign a level of importance to everything that people buy, and that alone makes the number of variables go well into the millions, not that there's a credible way of assigning levels of importance to begin with.
"..much more easily than trying to work out how many cine tickets got sold"
It is way easier to come up with a reasonably accurate estimate of the number of tickets sold than it is to come up with anything even remotely resembling accuracy from an "inflation calculator." All you need to do is divide the movie's actual gross by the average or typical price of a ticket at the time.