Thinks there is nothing that can be done about climate change

Complete nonsense. I would consider myself conservative, right wing, whatever. No leftist, in no way, shape or anything. But Jordan is a sack of shit, a charlatan, con artist. He even admitted it once himself on a Joe Rogan podcast. It's a brilliant scheme, as he makes these nonsensical debates with people like Sam Harris or Dilahunty where he totally derails them with utter word salad and evasive mumbo jumbo. There is not one coherent thought from him. Allthough I do agree with him on the transgender and pronoun issue and climate change.

WHERE DID I SAY CORPORATIONS ARE TO BLAME

How the fuck can I move goalposts of something I never said.

are you on the slower end of the spectrum?

"The fact that the country's political leadership is exclusively, monopoly style, composed of COMMUNISTS is a fact that strongly contradicts your claim."

no it doesnt. its all within a paradigm. the "Overton window" if you will of what is acceptable.

that will vary in the US what is politically acceptable vs turkey vs china.

SO while the US may accept far larger views, from libertarians to democratic socialists to everything in between with no consequences

so within the communist party (which is a contradiction because it is one of the worlds biggest traders, for private profits, for the profits of their CEOs and shareholders) is there an acceptable variance of views. that may be far smaller, yet it still exists even within the Chinese bureaucracy and political leadership. again a country isnt "one rule", its positions on literally hundreds of thousands of policies. so within those, take your pick, there will be some more conservative elements, some more progressive views, on each policy, and again WITHIN THE ACCEPTABLE PARADIGM.

so for example, when it comes to communist party political stranglehold on China. the acceptable paradigm may be the conservative one (nothing can and should change) to a more progressive one (the party should remain intact but with some small changes and opening up to other views)

again this is a far smaller paradigm than would be acceptable in the US, but it DOesnt mean there isnt some variance.

its not a dodge just because you have no basic fucking understanding of political science.

"It is NO me that said about China "so far to the right". And now you say "within the paradigm of what is allowed" - so "so far to the right" is in the communist paradigm according to you. HOW CAN YOU BE THIS STUPID???"

if I could understand your shit I could address it better. post a coherent paragraph next time.


"And it's irrelevant what the one in the street thinks and if he is a nazi as long as he has zero power to influence politics and climate change policies you dumb fuck."

the point is there is variance within those with political power fucktard. just like there was in nazi Germany. even if the power centered around a dictator. it wasnt a monolith, Reich officials disagreed, some were more left some right. look at Ernst Röhm who was a straight up revoltionary leftist socialist diehard.

thanks for PROVING MY POINT.


"Stop acting like you know anything, you say the most idiotic and moronic things and then you try to fix your stupidity and ignorance by attacking others but instead you sound more and more stupid. As usual you just make noise to cover your stupidity and ignorance. "


hahahah in other words, "I have no argument or rebuttal ill just ignore everything you said and say you are ignorant"

fuck off now kid. you have fully deflated and dont have the knowledge to talk about this topic. you have a simplistic uneducated view of this topic and the fact the real world is more complex and nuanced beyond "all da Chinese are da communists who all believe the exact same thing" shows what an uneducated loser you are

you can leave now

more deep insight. nice to see the mental extent of conservative brains. its clearly very limited