She hasn't done a press conference since announcing she is running
That isn't normal
shareTrue, and half the country just simply ignores that fact.
share
MovieChat Forums > Kamala Harris Discussion > She hasn't done a press conference since...
Most candidates are not proud rapists either, but millions of Americans have embraced that as their kind of normal. If I had to choose between no press conferences and a rapist, I would not be choosing the rapist.
shareThe fact that you have to go to lying, to defend your candidate, says all that needs to be said, not only about HER, but your true opinion of her.
Not lying. Not my candidate.
shareWhat is the basis of your retarded claim of "proud rapist"?
Because it makes you look like a leftard partisan asshole.
Trump brags about sexually assaulting women as perk of wealth. He was found responsible for a sexual assault. Ergo, proud rapist.
shareI doubt he’s raped anyone, sexually assaulted, yes probably, but the fact remains, our country is still better off in his hands that Harris’, and deep down you know it, and yes it’s fucking infuriating that this is where we are as a country, our options being that of an an incompetent imbecile and an amoral sociopath.
shareHe wasn't talking about sexual assault, he was saying if you're high status and confident they will LET you grope them. Big difference.
share1. Trump did not brag about sexually assaulting women. HE bragged about how groupies and gold diggers "let" famous men have their way with them.
Are you pretending that groupies and golddiggers are not a thing?
Yes, yes you are. And you are lying about this point.
2. A he said she said incident decades after the fact? That case has no credibility. The only thing to learn from THAT, is that the courts have been completely weaponized by your side into a tool of oppression and tryanny.
A vote for Trump is a vote to push back on such vile tactics and a vote in favor of civil rights for everyone, including people that the left hates.
Trump is opposed to civil rights, especially our 2nd Amendment rights.
share1. Trump did not brag about sexually assaulting women. HE bragged about how groupies and gold diggers "let" famous men have their way with them.
Are you pretending that groupies and golddiggers are not a thing?
Yes, yes you are. And you are lying about this point.
2. A he said she said incident decades after the fact? That case has no credibility. The only thing to learn from THAT, is that the courts have been completely weaponized by your side into a tool of oppression and tryanny.
3. Trump is by far the pro-civil rights candidate in this battle. THe dems are the party of censorship and arresting people for political reasons and political prisoners. To ignore all of that because of, what was it, bump stocks? Is absurd.
Are you pretending to be this naive? What about Trump's plan to confiscate any gun without due process and raising the age to buy a gun from 18 to 21?
shareNaive would be trusting the narrative being pushed by the people who want to arrest the leader of their political opposition.
I seriously and honestly addressed each of your three points. And you have NOTHING but a subject change in response?
That is you admitting that you KNOW that the shit you say, is shit.
If you believed that the talking points you constantly spout had ANY merit, you would be happy to pound those points home.
Instead you run away, like a little girl.
I don't trust any politician. Suggesting that I trust Harris due to being anti-Trump is naive.
You did not honestly address my points. You lied about Trump being a rapist.
I've been pounding away at Trump's anti-gun agenda and his pro-rape agenda for years. You choose to say otherwise for some reason.
1. Except you are trusting their narrative with out doubt.
2. Trump is not a rapist. Only a liar or a fool would believe that. You are trusting what your politicians and political leaders say, without question.
3. Yes, I did answer your points. And you ran away like a little girl.
4. Anyone who supports the dems, is not pro-gun. YOu are a shit talker.
I have posted nothing that says I trust anyone's narrative.
Trump is a proud rapist, why are you trying to take it away from him? He is proud of it after all.
I do not support anyone who is anti-gun. You support Trump the gun grabber though.
Everything you posts, says that you accept the left's narrative without question.
Then why can't you quote a single thing I said that supports your BS claim?
shareEVERYTHING you post, shows that you accept the left's narrative without question. EVERYTHING.
So when I object to Trump's anti-gun agenda, that shows that I "accept the left's narrative without question"?
Sounds as if you're claiming that the Democrats are the pro-gun party now. That is very stupid as everyone else knows they are not the pro-gun party. But then neither is the GOP.
When you attack one candidate, it looks as if you are propping the other up. Surely you understand this. How about saying who you DO support, instead of passive-aggressive dissing like a sucka?
shareNo, that is not the way it should be seen. I am not a politician running for office.
I support neither candidate as neither is one I like. However Trump has proven he is an unacceptable president and is unworthy of the office. Harris might be worthy.
I am not passively aggressively dissing Trump and have never done so. I have always been very aggressive in attacking Trump's positions, his character and his criminal record.
When you attack one candidate to tear them down, it's sensible to conclude that you want the other candidate to stay up. It has nothing to do with being a politician, it has to do with standing for something.
"Harris might be worthy."
See, was that so hard? Why beat around the bush about it?
I'm not sure I've seen a passive-aggressive post more passive-aggressive than your original post. Maybe be more aggressive next time.
The "other"? I have been attacking Trump since 2017. That does not mean I have supported the many others who have campaigned for President since then.
By original post, you mean my first post in this thread?
[–] Ranb (8599) 8 days agoshare
Most candidates are not proud rapists either, but millions of Americans have embraced that as their kind of normal. If I had to choose between no press conferences and a rapist, I would not be choosing the rapist.
Trump gets lied about constantly, but he is awful with 2A. Besides the ridiculous bump stock ban, he also said "take the guns, due process later".
That is horrific. Anyone who values their 2A rights should be very weary.
Still better than cackling Kamala, though.
And what do you think Harris's stance is on guns? You think she'll be better?
shareHarris is very anti-gun. She wants to ban assault weapons. Harris will try to grab guns just like Trump.
The question is, will she be as good at grabbing guns as Trump was? Will Harris want gun confiscations without due process?
Kamala wants to inplace a buyback program like australia.
https://moviechat.org/nm3668431/Kamala-Harris/66a12e3997f2121fed93a5e7/She-wants-to-smelt-AR-15s-and-flood-the-border
Isn’t it up to 28 days now?
shareDems don't want the voters to find out that she is an idiot. The same way as they were trying to hide Brandon's dementia.
shareSo what? It's not as if the presidency of "The Donald" was just an average, everyday, normal one! 🙄
shareThe fact that she was installed becuase "their guy" wouldnt be able to pull off a win in NOV and not giving the Amercan citizens their right to choose. And on top of that they are doing everything they can to keep her out of the public. Its criminal. Its bull shit. Its a dirty tactic.
Those are not the kind of people I want in the WH. These people will avoid the american citizens and do everything in their power to keep us in the dark.
How are the regular joes on the Left on board with this?
She'd have a hard time in a real press conference with actual, difficult questions, since basically she's trying to run against the mess she and Biden made.
share"basically she's trying to run against the mess she and Biden made."
Yeah, i'm super interested how they are going to maneuver that. She will eventually have to give an explanation, you would think anyway.
Aw, dude! You're using your brain! Some people are actually saying they're going to vote for her because she's a woman. The "check the boxes" type of people don't care if we climb out of this mess. And I wonder if they're not living with mom and dad and therefore don't know there IS a mess. Mom does the shopping for them, so they don't have that sticker shock at the grocery store or at the pump.
shareIf the rumors are true, that Biden was basically forced out of the race under threat on evoking the 25th amendment, that was a coup. Also, if the 25th applies to Biden(it surely does), they have a duty to get him out of office, not use it as a threat.
shareits been longer than 30 days now. 31 days in the longest month.
shareIt’s fine when D emoctats do it. If Trump went more than 30 seconds without answering questions the Democrat rectum was screaming reeeeeee Hitler Putin attack on ourdemocracy®️.
They hid Biden too.
And Obama his first time running.
And Kerry in 2004.
Democrats are inexperienced idiots who lack useful knowledge. If you need a liar talk to a Democrat. If you need someone who knows how to solve problems and get shit done, hire a Trump.
If Trump went more than 30 seconds without answering questions
He went a lot longer than that!
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/white-house-sets-record-longest-span-press-briefings/story?id=60472803 share