That's behind the "Hail Zelenskyy" Video Bundeswehr Soldiers plunder the apartments of Germans - to help Ukraine?
This conveys a satirical video that spreads quickly.
Apparently it comes from Russia.
Outrageous happenings in a small wine-growing village in the Palatinate:
A military squad rings the doorbell of a picturesque house and clears out the apartment of the residents!
The short film suggests, the items are confiscated for Ukraine.
The video clip went viral.
In fact, only the record from the Palatinate that is shown at the beginning of the film comes from Germany.
And is actually a six-year-old photo.
T-online investigated the story behind the propaganda strip.
The authorship was attributed by Russia to the german right-wing AfD.
In fact, it's a Russian production.
The bitter satire intends to undermine support for Ukraine in Germany.
In the past Russia already put great effort into such messages on the Internet.
A German Telegram channel showed the video early.
At the end of the film, a grim-looking Bundeswehr Soldier takes the stuffed animal from the family's child.
A Leopard. 🐆 ☺
Russia is making a fool of itself. 🪆
They must be VERY desperate.
Ukraine claps back after Russia puts Zelenskyy on 'wanted list' Moscow has sought to kill the Ukrainian President since the beginning of its full-scale invasion.
The addition of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to the Kremlin’s 'wanted list' shows "the desperation of the Russian state machine and propaganda," Ukraine’s ministry of foreign affairs wrote in a statement Saturday.
The list is an online database of those the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs accuses of being criminals. Russia reportedly said the Ukrainian leader was wanted "under an article of the criminal code" but did not provide further details.
Moscow has sought to assassinate the Ukrainian president since the beginning of its full-scale invasion of the country in February 2022, when Russian President Vladimir Putin called on the Ukrainian army to overthrow Zelenskyy.
In February Moscow added Estonia Prime Minister Kaja Kallas to its 'wanted list' for "desecration of historical memory and hostility towards Russia".
In its statement, the Ukraine ministry said that Moscow is "at a loss for what else to invent to garner attention". It also stressed that "unlike the worthless Russian announcements, the International Criminal Court’s warrant for the arrest of Russian dictator Vladimir Putin on war crimes charges is real and enforceable in 123 countries".
Something tells me you're one of those people that is shrugged off as not coming across as coherent because English isn't your first language but in reality you are equally incoherent in your native language.
SemiAnimus (821) 2 hours ago
Something tells me you're one of those people that is shrugged off as not coming across as coherent because English isn't your first language but in reality you are equally incoherent in your native language.
That and you're definitely batshit crazy.
And here's SemiAnal again.
Apparently he forgot our little encounter with this his account.
Now he tries to appear like public opinion. 🤣
Zelensky has admitted he needs to make peace. There is no way he can win, but at this point Ukraine cannot be trusted not to just build up again and again and attack Russia, so Russia is going to cut them off from the sea. Then it doesn't matter if they join NATO or not.
To avoid that Zelensky is trying to force European countries to send Ukrainian refugess back so he can make them fight and die in the war. This is a war the US supported before it even happened. Zelensky has lost, Russia has lost, the US has lost ... no one has won or will win. Even Russia who annexed these areas of Ukraine just inherited a big liability that it has to rebuild. All to keep Crimea which did not even want to become part of Ukraine, and which most Ukrainian were dead set against fighting for.
Putin has already strategically lost the War "The same problem as Hitler"
Russia has been waging a war of aggression against Ukraine for more than two years.
Despite Moscow's current progress on the front, military economist Keupp sees the Kremlin on the losing end. In the long term, he's certain that Russia has no chance against the industrial potential of the West.
According to military economist Marcus M. Keupp, who teaches in Zürich, Russia has already strategically lost its war of aggression against Ukraine. "Putin continues, even though he actually should have called off the war in the fall of 2023. It was then apparent that the production rate could not keep up with the wear rate."
Russia will reach a point where it will no longer be able to perform militarily. "The logic of attrition does not depend on any worldview. It's a question of logistics as in WWII. Whoever has the higher industrial potential in the long term and goes the distance will win."
Putin has the same problem as Hitler. "He had to win in the short term. Because in the long term he has no chance against the industrial potential of the West. That's the reason why he burns systems and people so massively at the front," Keupp continued. Putin wants a decision before "the entire massive arms industry in the entire Western world" gets started.
Thank you for your support, USA! 🇺🇸 ♥
You're absolutely right, Monsieur le Président Macron! 🇫🇷 ♥
Please stare down our hypocritical socialist chancellor again, this time for some years. ☺
Our chancellor says "Yah, yah" cause the german majority wants that.
And then he secretly blocks every delivery to the Ukraine for as long as he can. ☻
reply share
I think the west can certainly match and outmatch Russia in terms of military tech production over time - the problem is that the west military tech doesn't appear to be better than the russian military tech -
So what you end up with is 2 nations - with a crapload of weapons - one of which is being supplied by the west - but the problem is manpower shortage. The west cannot mass produce manpower - The only way to counter Russia's advantage is by having western boots on the ground. A smaller army cannot win against a much bigger army with much bigger mobilization potential if their military tech is on par.
Russia thinks that a satisfactory end to the war will be Russia taking control of Ukraine again. Then Ukraine will cease to exist except as a name on a map
Russia absolutely does not want to take control of a rebelling nation ... it would be like Afghanitan again. The US would be supplying arms and leadership.
Russia's purpose, I think, is to secure Crimea which they have owned since the 1600's, is very strategic ( like our Guantanamo ), and which they have dumped massive investment into. Since the war, and the peeling away of Ukraine from Russia, Crimea has been in a weird state, they were technically given to Ukraine by Kruschev in the 1950s, and were not Ukrainian. That created a confusion that as long as Ukraine was with Russia didn't make much difference.
When Ukraine was couped to the West and especially since it was threatened to join NATO, Russia should not have to give up Crimea or have NATO missiles placed within minutes of Moscow.
Make no mistake, we propagandize about this in the most transparent way, but this is the West attacking Russia, and Russia doing something about it.
When Russia defends itself, we get all kinds of BS propaganda articles in the West even today about Russia trying to remake itself as a global power.
I get the US worry that Russia could turn into another China, rich and powerful and a global competitor, but if there is a case for American global hegemony to be made, our government ought to make that case and get the backing of Americans - because the money it takes to fight these wars cuts into the lives of Americans bigtime, and in the case of Ukraine a big global cost too.
>When Ukraine was couped to the West and especially since it was threatened to join NATO, Russia should not have to give up Crimea or have NATO missiles placed within minutes of Moscow.
There are already, or is already the potential for NATO missiles places "within minutes of Moscow" without Ukraine.
>Make no mistake, we propagandize about this in the most transparent way, but this is the West attacking Russia, and Russia doing something about it.
What was the west going to do, exactly? Launch a ground invasion against another nuclear power?
[–] TrentnQuarantino (8583) 7 hours ago
When Russia defends itself, we get all kinds of BS propaganda articles in the West even today about Russia trying to remake itself as a global power.
You sound like a Russian influencer. Ukraine peacefully separated from the USSR in 1991. If Russia cared about defending itself, then they would not have provoked Ukraine with an invasion.
reply share
No I don't, you are calling me names because you cannot face facts with zero arguments.
> If Russia cared about defending itself, then they would not have provoked Ukraine with an invasion.
Another illogical conditional. You might benefit from a logic class. This is just like when a petulant obnoxious child tells a parent, if you loved me you'd buy me this toy.
Russia determines what their defensive needs, not a featherweight like you.
Think about what your government is - who is holds the power - how long it's been that way.
Let's just say.... USA has been controlled by non-Anglo-Saxons for a very long time.
Zelensky has admitted he needs to make peace. There is no way he can win, but at this point Ukraine cannot be trusted not to just build up again and again and attack Russia, so Russia is going to cut them off from the sea. Then it doesn't matter if they join NATO or not.
To avoid that Zelensky is trying to force European countries to send Ukrainian refugess back so he can make them fight and die in the war. This is a war the US supported before it even happened. Zelensky has lost, Russia has lost, the US has lost ... no one has won or will win. Even Russia who annexed these areas of Ukraine just inherited a big liability that it has to rebuild. All to keep Crimea which did not even want to become part of Ukraine, and which most Ukrainian were dead set against fighting for.
He's correct that Zelensky brought this turmoil on Ukraine and the world by his flirtations with NATO and his support for the fascist brigades which are trying to ethnically cleanse ethnic Russians from eastern Ukraine.
He's wrong because Russia has already won this war and there is no way Ukraine can drive the Russian military out of the Donbas at this point.
Crimea was given to Ukraine by the Soviet Union in 1954. It's 90% ethnic Russian and had always been part of Russia. What a farce.
Yes, this war is insane. 19 billion of American aid has gone to pay the pensions of retired Ukrainian officials. Everyone from Zelensky on down are lining their pockets while Ukrainian workers die.
> He's correct that Zelensky brought this turmoil on Ukraine and the world by his flirtations with NATO
I don't think that, precisely, was the problem. From all my reading and listening, I think that Putin has a very clear vision of the problem - after all he is Russia's responsible ruler, and I think he takes the role seriously, and has to do what he kind balancing all factors.
So, Putin realizes that the West, mostly driven by the US, but with some heavy realities is after Russia because of its potential, and future potential. Meaning that they are a huge multinational country with almost 3 times the land mass of any other country. In the same way that China is a threat because of its massive resources and human resources, Russia is a threat because of what it could develop into. Also, their authoritarian systems allow them to move faster than the West. One reason why the West is suliminally trying to go more authoritarian - to meet the challenge.
So, the West desires the break up of Russia. It also wants to prevent Russia from engaging in the world economically because of the same mistakes it made with China - building up masses of capital. Ergo, step one was to separate Ukraine from Russia. Before this operation, Ukraine was about 1/3 of Russia's economy. It did a lot of heavy industry. That huge cargo jet we saw in he movie 2012 was built there, but most of the shipping, trains, and a lot of agricultural goods.
I think Putin accepted that as inevitable, but he also concluded that losing Crimea was too high a price. He could not control the Ukrainian people, where the US pumping money and bribery and CIA operations primed Ukraine for all this Western prosperity if they would join the EU. Which by the way never happened - massive unemployment before the war. Yanukovych wanted the best for Ukraine, but also felt a responsibility for Russia since they were so close. Yanukovych knew dropping Russia and joining the EU was not fair to Russia, so he was working to try to make Urkaine a neutral go-between from West to East - a win-win. CIA was having none of that, and caused the coup.
Putin realized if this continued, Crimea was threatened, and it was easy for him to peel off Crimea from Ukraine as it was for the US to peel Ukraine off from Russia. Crimea held what I think was a legitimate vote and decided to annex to Russia. Then Ukraine's reaction was to move to take Crimea back by force. Most Ukrainians did not really care about this, and wanted an end to this violence and war, so Ukraine kept intensifying their attacks on Donbas buffer between Crimea and Ukraine proper to the point where the violence was unacceptable and Russia moved in in what they called a police action, the Special Military Operation. Russia's blunder was to break off and head towards Kiev to split Ukrainian forces which they did not expect to be so strong.
The West propagandized this as Russia trying to recreate the USSR, and invade Europe- a flat out lie that should have been obvious to all, but it was relentlessly pushing in the US media. After Russia moved in, the West had Zelensky in a bind, if he settled with Russia, the West said they would pull support, and nationalist forces in Ukraine wanted to keep fighting to rid Ukraine of Russian influence.
To keep the war going is all around bad and helps no one, but negotiating a solution will not solve the West's problem to keep Russia down, so a different war will just continue maybe elsewhere. Russia's continued existence will still threaten the West, as does China, but now the two are allies.
What we are left with is the West knowing that eventually Russia and China both will become peer compeititors and the US will lose its power over the world.
My feeling is that was true, except if the US would be more global and cooperative, a true arsenal of democracy instead of the false advertising we do today blowing rainbows but killing leaders and showing the iron fist. The world must become much more civilized and equal, but everybody wants to rule the world, as the song goes. We, the US do not think we can be a benevolent empire, and our oligarchs don't want to give up power.
Bottom line is that we blew it in Ukraine. Where we could do some good is in the Middle East following through on destroying the dream of global caliphate and reforming Islam and freeing its people from their toxic systems. But war is the universal way of life we have settled on - and no one knows how to stop.
You can't really say anything because you do not have the intelligence or awareness to read and understand anything. As an AI bot all you do is look for a few key words and then put some stupid insult together or reiterate short propganda points from your array[] of BS.
Apart from the fact that I replied to Onan, let's go step by step:
RUSSIA invaded the UKRAINE.
That's neither a "propaganda story" nor an "insult", just another fact.
It doesn't matter that you think Russia invaded Ukraine.
The context and intensity of this extension of the Cold War changes over the last 10 years, and the US CIA was involved in Ukrainian government.
The insult is that you expect anyone to buy your empty-headed narrative.
Nonsense. You're falling for the U.S. State Department's Cold War propaganda. Russia is no threat to us and NATO. They can't even quell the Ukrainians, what makes you think they'd attack even Poland?
The former Soviet states in central Asia are all Muslim. Do you really think Russia wants to ignite a jihad from its Middle Eastern allies?
Case in point 2008 and Russia's border war with the former Soviet state of Georgia. They helped two breakaway provinces separate from Georgia. Russia did not invade Georgia.
Why should I as an American or you as a German give a rat's ass about post-Soviet border skirmishes?
Russia does not want Ukraine, Georgia or Islamic Central Asia back. Stop with the hysterics. They are no threat to NATO and the West.
Are you saying that Russia invaded the Ukraine just for fun?!
Gosh, you'll do everything for 'your' money.
Even suspect me of "hysterics" (very manly), while you're supposedly worried about the dead Ukrainians (whom you try to disparage at every opportunity).
Cold Warrior bullshit. There are people in power with a lot to gain by an arms buildup.
Again, if Russia wanted Ukraine, why wait until 2022 to invade? If they had wanted Georgia, why stop with the independence of Abkhazia and South Ossetia? Why not use that as a pretext to invade Georgia? But Russia didn't.
Putin could not allow NATO in Ukraine. There would be missiles pointed at Moscow, it would abrogate Ukraine's neutrality pledge, and it would be a possible trigger for nuclear war.
Do I as an America like their border feuds with other nations? I'm old enough to remember the Cold War and I don't like Russia.
But this is U.S. State Department maneuvering to reignite the Cold War. Russia is no threat. This is Neo-Conservatism rearing its ugly head again. You're a fool to be sucked into this.
Russia just invades other countries, rapes and murders preferably civilians.
Child abduction is also a popular Russian pastime.
Usual Russian games... only "Neo-Conservatism"...Hossa! 🪆
Btw. this war began in 2014, shortly after the Ukrainians got rid of their corrupt Russian-controlled government.
#Euromaidan
#Revolution of Dignity
You simply worry about your money, money, MONEY!!!!
Means, you worry about nothing, YOU selfish idiot.
It's less the money, and more the fact that the U.S. keeps meddling allover the world, always loses (Vietnam, Afghanistan, the quagmire in Iraq blah blah blah), and leaves these countries worse off than they were before we got involved. End this Neo-Conservative bullshit. After Ukraine they'll have another one lined up.
Uh, Russia helping Abkhaz and South Ossetian separatists in Georgia and seizing 20% of Ukraine called the Donbas? As an American I don't give a rat's ass and it's not worth another 50 year Cold War with Russia and the specter of a nuclear holocaust. No thanks, frau. Why the fuck are we getting involved in this nonsense?
Don't talk about yourself in the pluralis majestatis "we".
Now you even try it with fear mongering "nuclear holocaust"...as your buddy Putin.
Luckily most of your fellow Americans can think further than a fat pig can jump.
I would care depending on motive and implications.
With respect to Ukraine, the US began this long ago pursuant to a long white paper written during or just after the collapse of the USSR, by the Rand Corporation - you can still find online if you look.
It betrays the strategy the US has of continual stress, attacks, sanctions, political moves against Russia for the sake of just degrading the Russian economy in hopes of causing a revolution and making Russians' lives miserable.
This is the 21st century and that is a shit policy for solving problems in the world. That said, it would not be a good thing for the US for Russia to get to the point that it is the #1 trading partner with the EU. That is the relevant issue here - but it has not been uttered once in any news report, and that is my #1 issue.
When the military in the US over-rides the civilian government, then the civilian government just becomes a reality show comedy joke. That is the core issue for the US that I can see.
> which has nothing to do with our national security.
Don't be so sure.
The sin of this war is that it was planned for a long time without the knowledge or consent of the American people. It was sold to us as Russia turning evil and first trying to take over Ukraine, then it was former Soviet satellite countries, then it was all of Europe, then the world. Putin was given the Hitler media treatment - not that Putin is a good guy - you have to remember that Putin is the head of a country marked for revolution and breakup by the United States, so he's not as easy-going or as stupid as our American Presidents.