Fauci Killed Dogs


Fauci b/c he helped coordinate experiments where Beagle dogs had their faces eaten off by bugs.

https://x.com/DC_Draino/status/1797704299100942550

reply

Of course he did. He tortured them while experimenting on them.

Are you surprised? He's an evil Jesuit.

Read their Jesuit Oath.

reply

F him

reply

I want him in prison. And not Club Fed. A real hardcore prison. Hopefully where everyone on his cell block had a grandmother who died alone during the lockdowns; a wife who died needlessly from Covid while being denied ivermectin which would have cured her; or a child who had a bad reaction to the vaccine, and another one who dropped dead of a heart attack while playing.

Then just let rough justice take its course.

reply

Dude and everyone who knew and covered for him need to swing.

i am generally against the death penalty, but this is Nuremberg 2.0 level.

reply

One of the reasons that correcting Tetralogy of Fallot (blue baby syndrome) was successful, was partly due to experimentation on dogs. The procedure to restore blood flow was perfected on dogs before it was used on humans in 1944. The experimentation resulted in lots of dogs dying, so that humans could live longer.

https://www.lib.uchicago.edu/collex/exhibits/dog-fight-the-animal-experimentation-debate-in-twentieth-century-chicago/the-nsmr/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vivien_Thomas#Blue_baby_syndrome

reply

Don't care. Humans created dogs in the state they exist today, through generations of selective breeding. They rely on us for safety, and this is the evil shit we do. Another species is in no way responsible for our problems, unless there are aliens out there somewhere who genetically modified us.

reply

Would you deny any medical advance to the people if they were developed using animal experiments?

reply

That's like asking if I would stop using railroads because they were built by slaves. No, but we should build them differently from now on.

reply

We DO build them differently now and animal research has changed a lot, there are much more limitations put on the research. I love animals so much that I would say that human advancement isn't worth the extreme harm or death of animals. That may be your opinion too, but, it doesn't sound like it.

reply

I did not state my position on animal testing. I only said it exists.

reply

I know, I wasn't replying to you bro.

reply

You propped up animal testing. Reasonably, one could conclude you want it to stay up. Hey, how about actually standing for something?

reply

I'm against animal experimentation in virtually any imaginable circumstance, but it's an extra layer of evil when the animal is one that we made reliant on us.

I don't "love" random animals I don't know. I just respect their individual consciousness, and I think that should afford them protection under the human legal system. Not necessarily against death, but against suffering that is unnecessary to them on an individual basis.

If an experiment is that important to human life, get a human volunteer, or one in a permanent vegetative state. That would be better than punishing a completely different species for our own issues, which are usually self-inflicted anyway.

reply

It’s amazing people on here have to convince you how immoral that is and that Fauci is an immoral individual. Unbelievable.

reply

Mean tweets! Don't look at Mengele!

reply

[deleted]