needs to go away - Meghan Markle Discussion

[–] MilesSim (6) 7 years ago

Did your daddy hit you?

reply

[–] [deleted] 7 years ago

A b-grade actress with average looks and silicone breasts

reply

[–] MilesSim (6) 7 years ago

She's not a bad looker and her acting skills are alright. She's as good as they come and looks great in a dress. The prince did well.

reply

[–] lukejbarnett (1869) 5 years ago

she's not that good looking, her nose is how do you say big, wide and ugly shaped. she has an ugly nose and just kind of an ugly face. princess kate is a lot more beautiful than her.

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

She is average... Same as Kate. Neither one would win a beauty contest but neither is as ugly as the backside of a horse either. Frankly they both come across as looking fake.

reply

[–] TheChamCham (60) 6 years ago

B ??? You are too kind.

reply

[–] lukejbarnett (1869) 5 years ago

really, do you have the pics to prove it?

reply

[–] CRK1968 (1) 7 years ago

I agree. She was a nobody until Prince Harry started dating her.

reply

[–] sleepingtiger (712) 7 years ago

A "nobody"? Uh, she did have a life and a career before she even met the Prince. She's also divorced with a child. Her whole life isn't defined by meeting some rich English dude, than k you very much.

reply

[–] exatera (3953) 7 years ago

Wait, since when does she have a child??

reply

[–] orangeflava (1858) 5 years ago

she has a child now but not then

reply

[–] lukejbarnett (1869) 5 years ago

yes it is and no she was a nobody, a complete nobody before she met him. she had no life and no career before meeting him.

reply

[–] moxey (141) 7 years ago

She's a crap actress.

reply

[–] John Kyle (677) 7 years ago

[deleted]

[–] [deleted] 7 years ago

She’s aged pretty well so far. She looks 10 years younger than her 36 years.

reply

[–] Sandoz (2021) 7 years ago

She looks her age. That is, if you're looking at photos that are re-touched.

reply

[–] lukejbarnett (1869) 5 years ago

exactly she looks a lot younger than 38 now. and she's always(ever since she started dating harry) looked about 10 years younger than her age.

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

She's starting to look older now, that's what happens with you put your body through child birth. It changes how you look. Hormones change. You start looking more 'mumsy'.

reply

[–] lukejbarnett (1869) 5 years ago

mumsy? lol yeah but there is a diffrence between a milf and a mom. an some young girls who have kids don't look like mothers at all bc they are a teenager or a 20s girl.

reply

[–] exatera (3953) 7 years ago

Well, is he really anything special to look at, or does he have any particular talents?

All that matters is that the two of them clicked and connected, not what onlookers think of their union.

reply

[–] TandyMan (11096) 6 years ago

No, he's a monster too. His brother is much better looking.

reply

[–] exatera (3953) 6 years ago

Oh please, how is he a monster? Just a regular-looking guy. Better-looking, in fact, than many men you'd see in the street.

His brother is nothing special IMO, especially now that he is bald.

reply

[–] AnubisRaydeen (7897) 6 years ago

Seems like a lovely lady. I find her more charming now in this spectacle than before. She's not ugly, that's for sure. Perhaps not my type. I hated her as Rachel on Suits. Part of the reason I quit. Easily the fault of the writing (maybe) but regardless, I wish her well in her new crazy life.

reply

[–] TandyMan (11096) 6 years ago

I think she's pretty hideous, but to each their own. None of her facial features compliment each other. She looks like a Frankenstein monster.

reply

[–] Keelai (34858) 6 years ago

Samantha? Thomas?

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

yo mommas not that attractive or talented either , but you dont see us going on about it .

reply