...after 'Dispatches' puts a herculean effort into finding any woman who will speak out against Brand for payment.
Convincing, isn't it?
You live in a world now where a female can claim you raped her with no hard evidence other than she said so and they'll believe her over you.. All one has to do is look at Danny Masterson who gets 30 Years for something that may or may not have occurred and from 22 Years ago at that??
shareYup. Entertainers Rolf Harris and Dave Lee Travis were literally convicted on the basis of allegation. The groping that supposedly occurred decades earlier was absolutely unprovable in court, and everyone knew it. But once Operation Yewtree was launched, a handful of entertainers simply had to go down. Me Too, Time's Up and similar movements began to coalesce around that time, with the mantra of "believe [all] women" gaining significant political clout and infecting judicial systems.
shareI'm sorry, but we live in a world of trendy bullshit.
Some many years ago, it was trendy to be investigated and marginalized if someone was called a terrorist. No proof needed.
Some years ago, it was trendy to be investigated and marginalized if you somehow doubted that the covid 19 vaccine is actually so harmless. No proof needed.
Now its trendy to be investigated and marginalized if someone says you raped them x years ago.
It doesn't take too much brain to figure out that some people use msm in their advantage to just push forward some shit.
Who is to blame? Not the bad people, not the msm. Actually its the brain dead stupid fucks who believe this shit.
How many are there? A LOT ! When the internet became mainstream, all these people flooded in. People who you would normally ignore now have a voice.
So until human stupidity is solved, this shit gonna happen.
it's fucking insane fake justice.
ought not to be a thing.
10 year limit. if YOU didn't get your mental shit together about being raped for TEN YEARS, that's on you.
should be a 1 year limit.
No it should be 24 hours after the act, only longer if you were in capacitated or held against your will. And if you are able to get a rape kit done and don't then you can't file a report. If you do file a report after the fact then you should be arrested for obstruction of justice because lets face it if you really were raped and say nothin you have just enabled a rapist to victimize someone else. Do things like that and you would eliminate this buyers remorse bullshit that has become the norm.
It has gotten to the point that any time you sleep with someone you damn well better video the whole thing and keep the video for life because you never know when some woman is going to get pissed off and cry rape.
Very true. It's the waiting that is wrecking their own best support.
shareFYI it is legally possible to rape someone who has been voluntarily shagging you. If they so "no" that time, after having said "yes" before, then forcing them to fuck when they don't want to is rape.
And if you don't know that, then you should also know that "Spousal Rape" is illegal in all civilized countries. Because when someone agrees to fuck you, that doesn't mean that from then on, you get to fuck them whenever you want. Even in an established relationship or a marriage, consent is still legally required.
There’s rape and there’s ‘rape’. Violent gang rape where multiple males take turns on someone beaten and held down is distinct from sex where, at some point, one party was less than 100% certain they’re entirely in the mood.
Sex is messy, with plenty of power dynamics and role playing. I’ve had a few women request violent sex, including strangulation.
For there to be a pile-on years after the fact, clearly goaded by the media, and just when Brand cements himself as anti-establishment powers, is dodgy as hell. I don’t think anybody legit believes these allegations, or that those making them are sincere, it’s so obviously a political snipe job to silence an effective dissenter.
I say this as someone who doesn’t like Russell Brand.
Wrong. Legally, rape is rape, and it's still rape whether someone is forcing their wife to fuck when she said "no", or it's violent rape involving kidnapping and bikers or whatever. The distinction you are drawing has no legal force, it's just you making up your mind that you won't believe anyone whose experience doesn't meet your definition of violent rape.
So I strongly advise you to shut up and find out what the penal codes in your area actually say, before you get yourself in real trouble.
I strongly advise you to stop being a fucking idiot and read a post properly before replying. Nothing you’ve said addresses the points I’ve made, and then you layer on a load of straw-manning and smug, unsolicited ‘advice’.
Try again but this time read the post and don’t be a prick.
Nobody cares what your opinion about the law is except you. The law is the law, and like everyone else you obey it or you pay the legal penalty.
Because nobody's changing laws just because you find them inconvenient.
The fuck are you talking about? You’re arguing against points I never made, you’re arguing with yourself. Freak.
shareBikers? You're more likely to be raped by frat boys or accountants.
shareSo Brand would be guilty of "turning" on multiple women who were voluntarily banging him silly. None of whom were "able" to file a police report.
Got it. Highly convincing.
It is as convincing as Harvey's alleged rape victim that took him home to meet her mother after he allegedly raped her.... Of course the wacky jury believed her and he's stuck in prison... I think his only crime was probably promising to make some talentless woman a star if she boinked him and she was such a bad actress he couldn't turn her into the next Jennifer Lawrence
shareDUDE...NOW YOU'RE SIMPING FOR HARVEY WEINSTEIN?....WOW...THAT IS SOME NEXT LEVEL SCUMBAG BEHAVIOR.
shareIn the long run, men are gonna be wary of hiring or working with women out of fear to be called a rapist.
shareIn the long run, men are gonna be wary of hiring or working with women out of fear to be called a rapist."
I think that's a bit much, however, they might be wary of having a serious relationship with a female because of it?? Times have definitely changed, that much is certain.. When it comes to having sex moving forward in a relationship, the man is going to have to ask permission for everything and never assume, otherwise, he'll get 30 Years right off the bat from the Court of Social Media..
YEAH...THE MAN WHO HAS NO CLUE HOW TO INTERACT WITH FEMALES.
shareOh, I interact with females just fine, I'm merely cautious after seeing how men are being thrown under a bus and given 30 Years for merely saying someone raped them and 22 years ago no less?? Wouldn't you be a little more cautious if you're a male just based on that alone?? And why do you post in all Uppercase??
shareMORE CAUTIOUS OF WHAT?...FORCING MYSELF ON SOMEONE?...I HAVE NEVER RAPED...FORCED MYSELF ON OR PRESSURED A WOMAN FOR SEX...AND YOU KNOW WHAT'S WEIRD?...I HAVE NO WORRIES,MY CAUTIONS ARE NOT RAISED AND BEST OF ALL...I DON'T HAVE A DIM VIEW OF WOMEN.
sharelisten , amateur rape lawyers, Its very simple
These women dont come forward because to do so is an incredibly traumatic ordeal , and there is a 99% chance their claims will be dismissed, as well as them being sued etc . Rich celebs can buy more 'justice'.
Only when it turns out that this is serial rapist behaviour and many other women can back up that the same person did that to them , do they come forward .
Rightly or wrongly , thats what the delay is.
Your rather arrogant comment is laden with personal opinion and conspiracy.
shareLots of powerful people have been accused over the last couple decades.
The idea that they were afraid of powerful people doesn't hold water.
Bill Clinton and Harvey Weinstein all had 1000x the clout Brand has and yet the accusers are afraid?
Uh huh.
What he's going on about and his million+ viewers painted a target on him plain and simple.