she is a hero
maga
shareShe didn't do anything heroic.
share
MovieChat Forums > Ashli Babbitt Discussion > she is a hero
She got what she deserved.
Guaranteed you're one of the following phenotypes, degenerate dregs of society the lot of you.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EwaVxfyW8AUEurm.jpg
I don't know any of those people.
I am an American who believes in law and order and that America is not yet a third world, third rate totalitarian shithole where people run amuck and destroy public property trying to get their way.
How did the Antifa and BLM riots work out for you?
https://media.tenor.com/Ti4dksUQBCoAAAAM/bye-so-long.gif
share
Good riddance. Don't you have a Walmart to pilfer ?
Are you confused? I'm no antifa scumbag.
share
Then breaking into government buildings, destroying property and rioting is OK when it supports your cause, but it's bad when it supports the other side?
You mean when antifa were breaking in and the Trump supporters were telling them to stop?
https://twitter.com/ChuckCallesto/status/1633534860747759630?s=20
Or when Chanley was telling people to go home?
https://twitter.com/NewsBecker/status/1634045877999501312?s=20
Looks like very orderly rioting here are you sure you know what actually happened and aren't just repeating the bullshit as usual?
https://twitter.com/stevenvoiceover/status/1633218199981375489?s=20
Just a quick reminder what an actual riot looks like.
https://twitter.com/TheLaurenChen/status/1633718694210863104?s=20
Looks like very orderly rioting here are you sure you know what actually happened and aren't just repeating the bullshit as usual?
You mean this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AWMpTHLJXbw&t=9s
Tell me, if Trump had won in 2020 and Antifa had the same exact "protest", and an Antifa member was shot going trying to go through a barrier they just destroyed, would you defend the Antifa member?
Protesting is one thing, breaking down a barrier inside the Capitol is something else. These people weren't only naive and stooges, they were also violent.
*Anybody* who is breaking down a barrier to trespass in the Capitol should be shot.
share
Mostly peaceful.
https://i.imgflip.com/35dmxh.png
And in the ACTUAL definition of the words not the spindoctoring CNN definition
https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/035/101/CNN_Mostly_Peaceful_Protests_Banner.jpg
Some people acted badly. A handful came ready for a fight while others admit they were caught up in a mob mentality that unfolded over the course of the afternoon.
The overwhelming majority of protesters did not act badly or violently. Not only do security footage and other video sources demonstrate that is indeed true, the Justice Department’s own data supports it. “Parading” in the Capitol, a class B misdemeanor, is by far the most common charge in the Justice Department’s sweeping investigation. According to an update published this week, 919 out of 1,000 defendants face trespassing charges. Of the 518 who accepted plea agreements, 385 pleaded guilty to misdemeanors and 133 pleaded guilty to a felony.
The most common felony is not “insurrection” but rather obstruction of an official proceeding. Fewer than 20 people face seditious conspiracy charges.
Roughly 100 defendants are accused of attacking police officers with a dangerous weapon. No one is charged with carrying or using a firearm inside the building.
https://amgreatness.com/2023/03/09/a-handy-january-6-fact-sheet/
90% of cases are trespassing and parading.
10% are accused of attacking police
2% are facing charges of sedition.
https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/capitol-breach-cases
Save your faux outrage for someone as stupid or more stupid than you as they are they only people gullible enough to swallow your pathetic gaslighting. share
You didn't answer my question: If Trump had won and Antifia had "mostly peacefully" protested that day, and a handful got loose and broke down a barrier to get to Congressional members for whatever reason they had and got shot, would you defend the person shot by the police? That's a yes or no answer.
"Just imagine if that were the other side doing that"
Yeah like you guys give a shit about double standards or hypocrisy, get fucked!
https://media.tenor.com/OqzQKMevr6oAAAAM/point-and-laugh-schadenfreude.gif
Answer the question please.
"Just imagine if that were the other side doing that"
Yeah like you guys give a shit about double standards or hypocrisy, get fucked!
https://media.tenor.com/OqzQKMevr6oAAAAM/point-and-laugh-schadenfreude.gif
When people make asinine comments like that, I quietly pray hell exists because I know that's where they'll end up.
share
Well Comrade, anarchy and violent attacks on the government may exist in your part of the world, but in America, we go by laws. Babbitt was breaking through a barricade to get to Congressional members and got shot. This is how we deal with anarchists in this country.
Yes, I'm sure she was an anarchist, scribbling little anarchy symbols on her backpack and taking selfies where she gives the camera the middle finger. I'm sure that's exactly who she was...
sharestrntz is a disgusting gaslighting pos who doesn't believe Babbitt was a threat but will pretend she was and will pretend to have some kind of standards and belief in the US judicial system to "win" an argument on the internet with strangers but very likely looks like one of these https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EwaVxfyW8AUEurm.jpg
share
Instead of looking for an advocate to help you, why don't you answer my question? Here it is again. It's a simple yes or no deal:
If Trump had won and Antifia had "mostly peacefully" protested that day, and a handful got loose and broke down a barrier to get to Congressional members for whatever reason they had and got shot, would you defend the person shot by the police? That's a yes or no answer.
"Just imagine if that were the other side doing that"
Yeah like you guys give a shit about double standards or hypocrisy, get fucked!
https://media.tenor.com/OqzQKMevr6oAAAAM/point-and-laugh-schadenfreude.gif
Well Comrade, it was more than scribbling and selfies. She *broke* down a barrier and was trying to get to elected government officials who were being evacuated from the mob. That Comrade is the very definition of anarchist.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AWMpTHLJXbw&t=9s
Not much scribbling going on there...
She *broke* down a barrier
Yes
and was trying to get to elected government officials
Prove it or have it dismissed as left wing fantasy. share
Well, let's see... There were no reports of free pizza or pastry behind the barrier. What is your sober opinion of what they had in mind if they weren't stopped?
And I am not a "left" wing person. I am a true conservative who values truth and fairness. We don't apply laws only when it suits our side. I don't care *who* broke down that barrier, anyone who forces their way inside a government building to force their agenda should be shot. That's how Castro got in power. Conservatives are Constitutionalists. The law of the land must be obeyed.
I posit that Ashli desperately needed to go to the bathroom and thought there was one on the other side of the door. I support my theory with the same amount of evidence you supported your theory with ie fuck all.
You are not a conservative. You fool no one.
I posit that Ashli desperately needed to go to the bathroom and thought there was one on the other side of the door.
My theory has merit: she was breaking down the door in order to get to Congressional members. Here is my proof:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AWMpTHLJXbw&t=9s
Now, if you have a theory (besides the bathroom one) why she was breaking through a barrier besides the obvious, then by all means present your proof.
share
My theory has merit: she was breaking down the door as she thought there was a bathroom on the other side and she desperately needed to urinate. Here is my proof:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AWMpTHLJXbw&t=9s
https://media.tenor.com/sjqCVh4GiOoAAAAC/wanker-max.gif
So even supporters know they haven't a leg to stand on. Otherwise, why would you avoid the question instead of giving an honest answer?
shareWhat question did I avoid, Einstein?
shareOh dear. You lose the thread that quickly? I'll remind you:
"What is your sober opinion of what they had in mind if they weren't stopped?"
I posit that Ashli desperately needed to go to the bathroom and thought there was one on the other side of the door. I support my theory with the same amount of evidence you supported your theory with ie fuck allshare
So even supporters know they haven't a leg to stand on. Otherwise, why would you avoid the question instead of giving an honest answer?
shareProve my answer is not honest.
shareProve that she didn't mind control the Secret Service agent into shooting her.
Seriously, just how much of an idiot do you want to be?
Your concession that you cannot prove my answer was not honest is noted.
shareI don't need to prove that your answer is dishonest in order to know it's dishonest. It is so obviously dishonest, that I have to conclude you are a particularly stupid individual if you expect anyone to think it an honest answer.
You just can't give an honest answer, because you know you're siding with the bad guys. And your constant evasion is proof of that.
Your opinion on my answer has been noted and discarded.
Jan 6th was mostly peaceful. I watched livestreams in 2020 from all over the US as different cities burned and even the POTUS was evacuated to an emergency bunker. I'm sure you'll remember the bunkerboy insult all the NPCs had been updated with and were using against Trump at the time.
Jan 6th was a walk in the park in comparison and any attempt to paint it as an insurrection is the thing that is so obviously dishonest that if you even attempt that argument with me I cannot believe another word you say.
It was so peaceful that POTUS was evacuated... Right.
What is your sober opinion of what they had in mind if they weren't stopped?
Note, by the way, the question isn't about Babbitt. It says THEY. So stop playing dumber than you already are.
You see how you just completely dismissed the 2020 riots out of hand? That's exactly what I do to Jan 6th
https://media-cldnry.s-nbcnews.com/image/upload/newscms/2016_23/1570956/160608-trump_thelid-1614.jpg
We're not talking about the 2020 riots. You're trying to change the subject. Another tell-tale sign of a liar who has been cornered.
What is your sober opinion of what they had in mind if they weren't stopped?
You have yet to answer that question.
LMFAO GTFO and get blocked faggot, I owe you absolutely nothing!
https://media.tenor.com/sjqCVh4GiOoAAAAC/wanker-max.gif
It doesn't matter why she was breaking through the barrier
Fact is , she continued to do so after being warned by the armed guard.
You like imagining people burning for eternity. That's always been so gross to me, that people who like to purport themselves as moral get absolutely gleeful at the idea of people suffering in the worst way imaginable.
shareMore like zero. Terrorist and traitor.
Signed, million man.
Lmao... 😂
shareMore like a fool who got killed for a lie many (apparently) even on the Republican side didn't actually believe in. The officer who shot her had no way of knowing what was in her backpack, and once she and the rest of the deluded rabble got to the area the lawmakers and the votes (hostages?) were it would have been too late to do anything about it. If you think her shooting was violent, it would have paled in comparison to the chaos and violence that would ensued if we had a fullblown constitutional crisis.
share
There would have been no Constitutional crisis. While the mob's specific plans aren't *exactly* known, we do know they were a flash mob acting on their own stupidity centered around preventing Biden from being certified as president, but they had no power to effect any change. To have a Constitutional crisis we would have needed for a legitimate attempt to be made on the U.S. government and there was none. These dolts had no plan, no provisions for a protracted take-over, no help from the police, military, or even a single Congressional member.
They could have created a lot of mayhem certainly and a violent attack on the Capitol had to be met with any force necessary. If they managed to take hostages there could have been a stand-off, but there was no real chance they could achieve anything that would affect the transition of power, something the U.S. has always prided itself on.
Once the stopping of the certification had become a fait accompli you'd be surprised how many would start to fall in line just as some are doing even now.
Trump would likely have thrown them under the bus but spent the last two years still in power while he investigated "to find out what was going on". You don't seriously Trump would have given up after getting that far, do you? Because I sure don't.
Nah, just another ignorant Trumptwat who got exactly what she deserved...
shareSometimes I feel sorry for her, having been seduced by a lie and egged on by liars and bigots. But only sometimes...
shareI surprised that you're not calling her a crisis actor who faked her own death. Isn't that so fashionable these days among the MAGA elite?
share