Him or Matthew Crooks

Crooks is more idiotic. Crooks put himself in a position from which there was no way to evade Secret Service snipers when he started to shoot.

Rittenhouse was a stupid kid who put himself in harms way and then shot three people.

Crooks was a deranged leftoid, a democratic donor who shot the republican candidate.

Rittenhouse is an upstanding citizen, enjoying the freedom that leftist monsters failed to take away.

Rittenhouse is a hero, only in modern day america is it a sin to defend yourself.

Those shines were out of control, FACT

You are the biggest idiot for even having to ask this question.

Idiot?
Rittenstud is the man!
He did rid society of a kiddy-diddler and wife beater.

You're the biggest idiot for thinking Rittenhouse is an idiot. He's a hero. He killed and wounded utter scum. The fact you're anti Rittenhouse says a lot of about you. Someone should check your hard drives...

There is no similarity. Crooks was a psychopath who attempted to murder an ex-president, and ended up killing a bystander instead. Rittenhouse was attempting to defend private property from rioters, was chased by thugs who were trying to kill him, and defended himself.

I'll never understand the hate for Rittenhouse. He wasted two violent criminals who were trying to stomp him into a coma.

There were videos all over the internet that summer of people being kicked nearly to death by mobs during the BLM riots - he wasn't armed and shooting for the hell of it, it was a warzone.

Rittenhouse even put his weapon down after a black rioter charged towards him but then put his hands up when he knew that Kyle wasn't fucking around. If he was a cold blooded murderer, he would've shot him, too.

Crooks tried to be Oswald but ended up killing an innocent family man who was well liked by his community and with no violent criminal record. There is no comparison between the two.