MovieChat Forums > Emma Watson Discussion > I'm not a pedophile, but...

I'm not a pedophile, but...


I think she was way cuter in Harry Potter films before puberty hit her.

reply

Noticing and acknowledging that a child is cute does not make you a pedophile, so don't worry.

reply

Especially when they chose the cutest possible girl they could find. But after that the growth of the girl was no longer something they can control, but luckily she grew into a good looking teenager.

But none could deny she was the cutest in the early movies.

Even to this day I have never found her hot in anyway, not even when she had the wardrobe malfunctions when she was around 20, maybe that cute little girl image was burnt into my consciousness.

reply

I was able to easily make the transition from cute kid to smoking-hot adult.

Lindsay Lohan was cute-AF in Parent Trap, but never had the "holy fuck" hotness as an adult. I have pointed it out several times on these boards though, that she did look great imitating Hermione on SNL after her B(oYo)Bs first came in. That's one of the funniest SNL skits I have ever seen.

reply

she did look great imitating Hermione on SNL after her B(oYo)Bs first came in.

Yes, that one was great.

reply

Exactly and you can say a child is cute without being sexually attracted to them, if that’s the case then you aren’t a pedophile

reply

LOL! What college taught you that? Dumbass A&M?

reply

It definitely wasn’t the retard college you barely graduated from

reply

Well at least I graduated. I didn’t lie about having two PHD’s.

reply

Get a life you loser

I live in your head rent free

reply

Nice Joker quote bro. At least one person on this planet is now thinking about you. Now stop defending your pedo thoughts on little girls and actually try enrolling in college for once.

reply

When did the Joker say that?

reply

While I agree with the others here that thinking a child is cute doesn't equate to pedophilia (who doesn't love cute kids?), the phrasing of your topic could be better.

"I'm not a pedophile, but..." is not the best way to open this conversation.

reply

Yeah, I was gonna say. This observation is fine. But starting the topic like that is a bit sus XD

reply

Or it is simply acknowledging how the statement would be interpreted by many people with the intent of trying to prevent that type of conversation to begin with.

reply

with the intent of trying to prevent that type of conversation to begin with.


Putting it in the headline like that is clearly clickbait at best, sus at worst. Acknowledgment of how the statement can be interpreted is fine. But self-awareness of presentation is a valuable thing in real life.

reply

There's a difference between saying someone is "hot" and someone is "cute."

And I agree she was cute in those early films.

reply

Girlfriends can be cute too.

reply

FBI wants to know your location

reply

Great... I'm sure they have it already, but I might be outside of their jurisdiction.

reply

She is like wine, gets better with time

reply

CREEPY.

reply

Well considering she was ugly back then, I think it really says you have bad taste. If you think she is attractive today then you may have some gay tendencies as she look very boyish like one of those guys that decides to be a trans.

reply

"Well considering she was ugly back then, I think it really says you have bad taste."

How nice of you...

reply

You present yourself as being creepy and defensive. Not a good way to present yourself.

reply

Sorry about that...

reply

No, you’re not. You don’t know how to be truly sorry. You’re just being pseudo congenial. It’s a sham, insincere non-reply.

By the way, educated people know that elipses have three spaces between the dots that usually, but not always, denote eliminated material in the statement. Four elipses are called for at the end of a truncated sentence, like your attempt, and they must all be separated by a space. Kate Turabian: The Chicgo Manual of Style.

Yes. I am mocking you.

reply