"You need to get out more..."
Hmmm . . . always a bad sign when someone feels the need to begin a post with a snarky remark.
"The whole thing is called "single use plastic" and paper straws have been an issue with irrational liberals for decades."
When I said I don't know why steering away from plastic (in the context of my original post) has to be a liberal thing, I was referring to the idea that micro plastics may turn out to be very harmful -- as I originally said "may contribute to neurodegenerative diseases."
That we should ween ourselves away from ingesting plastic particulates should not be a part of any political divide. I know many conservatives who care about the environment, health issues such as nanoparticles, and even receive vaccines! So because I know many such people in my private life, I recoil at the idea of this concern being categorized as "liberal." That's my context.
Per the rest of your comment, environmentalists get it wrong sometimes, they "lie," but then, there are anti-environmentalists who lie. All that means is that we all are responsible for doing our homework on each issue and not just choosing a side and vilifying the other.
"I'm a liberal type but despise the irrational variety saying we should use cars, oil, straws, eat this or that, and so on when it's all not possible in our civilization."
The "irrational variety" -- a liberal? Who says we should use cars, oil, straws, etc.? I think you misspoke.
There are real concerns in the world that we should all recognize and support efforts -- the correct effort (no matter which side comes up with the best idea) -- to rectify before greater harm is done.
This includes nanoparticles, space junk, climate change, etc.
Ignoring it. Denying it. Pretending it doesn't exist. Will never solve the problems which will eventually swallow us whole.
And to suggest "there's no other way" is thinking like an insect.
reply
share