King Charles Vs Donald Trump
Trump is Brash and has small hands.
Charles is Kind, wanted to be a tampon, and has big ears.
American Should go back to being under the Rules of The British Monarchy.
Absolutely not. Even England has turned the monarchy into powerless figureheads while the Prime Minister and Parliament do all the ruling.
Charles is a coward and an idiot. I would never want to be ruled by a fool like that. At least Trump has balls. Can't say the same about Charles.
Charles is weak and easily manipulated. It is a good thing he doesn't have much actual power. His mother, on the other hand, was a titan.
shareYeah, but she coddled both him and Andrew. There's a reason they both grew up spoiled and weak. Even Philip's attempts to have Charles grow a pair came to nothing with that boy's academy. It's interesting that Princess Anne turned out okay, as did a few of her other kids, but the crown prince and his brother grew up to be losers that are hated, lampooned, or ignored by most British citizens.
Charles wouldn't have stood a chance in ancient times as a king. Someone aggressive in the royal court would have been using him like a puppet while England fell to ruin, and sooner or later, he would be deposed or assassinated when a newer, more aggressive king came along.
I am impressed by how knowledgeable you are about the British Royal family.
shareThey are slumlords.
shareI'm planning on reading more, but I've heard a lot so far from reading about Princess Diana and what her two sons have been up to.
shareBravo. Only good things can come from reading more. I have a Ph.D. from a very prestigious institution, but I have learned far more just by reading on my own than from formal education. What I have learned is that you don't need a formal degree to be a worldly educated person. Just be curious...and absorb knowledge, be it from books, podcasts, or just talking to people that have experienced life. Going forward, should I see a post of yours I disagree with, I will just assume you know what you are talking about, and it is I who is uninformed and should educate myself before responding.
I'm unhappy to have found out, for example, that all the books I read on Diana back in high school for my Senior English book report were partially in error. She had them slanted in her favor to make her look like a saintly, innocent victim, make the royal family like a bunch of cold-hearted liars that tricked her into the institution and a sham marriage, that Camilla was an evil bulldog that "stole" Charles from Diana (when Charles was never in love with her to start with), and other shit like that. Turns out that Diana wasn't always the saint people made her out to be. She was bi-polar, probably borderline too, was very needy, not a very good mom, could get violent when she didn't get what she wanted, didn't like animals, loved to party in the city, had affairs with dozens of men, and it turns out that she was the architect of her own demise, not the royal family. I mean, you don't call the paparazzi, tell them where your car is going and to come chase you, then get into said car with a drunk driver, don't put on your seatbelt, and expect to live through that. In fact, the person who started that entire conspiracy theory about the RF "murdering Diana" was none other than her boyfriend's dad, who was scumbag himself when it came to sexually harassing women in his own line of work.
The RF weren't entirely innocent either. Both parties committed wrongs in this entire situation with the princess.
The sad part is, the worst of Diana lives on in Harry. She actually said he was "an airhead like her."
Anti-gun Trump has no balls at all. He folded like a lawn chair after a single mass shooting.
share