1. We didn't see the moment Trump's ear bleed, we just saw him covering his ear. It's possible he put blood on his own ear. It's a common technique in WWE.
2. Trump has everything to lose, he was being convicted, and if he doesn't win the election he will be sent to jail. People will do crazy things to avoid going to jail.
So your theory is that Trump paid an assassin to climb atop a building, and bribed the Secret Service to leave that building empty. He told the guy to shoot and kill some of his supporters, and then he timed it so when the shooting start he slapped some fake blood on his ear and pretended to be shot? All in full view of thousands of people, and hundreds of cameras, with the hope that no one captured an angle of him slapping the fake blood onto his ear?
shareIt is more likely Trump didn't bribe the USSS, but told the shooter: "I ordered the USSS not to search that area, you would be fine to shoot on the roof of the building." The shooter would believe him, but the truth was that Trump never talked to the USSS. He knew the man would die, and the USSS would do all the work for him. And I replied many times about blood: it's more likely blood was put on his ear after they put him down, so no one can't see they put blood on him.
You had the chance to see a photo of Trump's wounded ear. A pretty good make-up artist might need 5-10 mins to fake this. But hey, Trump did this with just one hand and without any mirror... 🙄
Get out of mom's basement and find a job!
No no, Trump physically slashed his own ear with a razor, WWE-style, right after the bullet whizzed by his head (which we have photos of - https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GSaDvF6XYAA7rR1?format=jpg&name=large) to create a realistic looking wound.
Yes, this is an actual argument these nutbars are using.
Wow.
Are there really people this stupid.
The perception control of taking ‘sides’ is on public display after the Trump shooting. Those on the Trump-supporting right ask no questions when they would normally do so – and rightly – after a school shooting etc., except for those that confirm their belief system.
Meanwhile, the Trump-hating left claim that the shooting was staged. The Trump-supporting right condemn such claims when had it been Biden they would have been asking the same questions and making the same points.
Deciding a situation by reflex action based on your ‘side’ is no way to establish the truth about anything.
Proper researchers don’t take sides which can skew their perceptions and ask all the necessary questions before reaching their conclusions. Dispassionate forensic calm is how you reach the truth in any situation, not emotional reaction based on pre-conceived political or religious belief.
I am not saying that the shooting was not genuine, in whatever sense that turns out to be, nor that the protection squad do not have many questions to answer. I am saying that we cannot pick and choose what we question and what we don’t if we have any interest in establishing the truth in any situation.
If the questions are not valid then they will be shown to be so and we get closer to the truth that way. Not asking them and seeing if the answers stand up to scrutiny is the way we have been scammed over and over generation after generation.
Asking questions should never be condemned no matter if you agree with them or not. We've been down that road and it doesn't work.
I hope people dumb as you don't procreate.
shareWell, three other people were shot; one of those was killed. The shooter was killed by the Secret Service. Not a hoax.
shareNot a hoax, it was 100% real.
After everything they have done to him in the past eight years, why would you believe such BlueAnon nonsense?
People will do crazy things to avoid going to jail.
Zero percent chance
share