Jesus, even the Jurors chosen know this is a complete farce of a trial and are only participating in this to say they were on a Jury for the Former and soon to be 47th President, Donald Trump's Trial and for when this whole thing blows up in Alvin Braggs face because he's going to have to prove without a shadow of doubt, all 34 charges happened and he's not going to be able to do it
An impartial jury has to be nearly impossible. This is a serious issue that really should have been considered BEFORE the morons even started the prosecution.
LOL!!!! They're so quick to tossing the man in prison that they've made 1 mistake after another and if it's not this, it's that Fani Willis who should've already been dismissed along with that tainted case
If they were quick about tossing Trump in jail, then he would already be behind bars for violating judges' orders. Trump is getting kid gloves treatment. Few people are willing to hold him accountable.
If they're making so many mistakes, why can't you identify any of those mistakes?
This thread is about the NY criminal indictments related to hush money payments. Fani Willis is a DA in Georgia. Anything Willis does, has no affect on the NY trial that Trump is involved with now.
People don't vote because they don't think that their vote matters. ANd in most states, to a great extent is doesn't. Because most states are safe for one side or another.
That does not mean that the voter who decided to not bother going to the polls, has not been tainted by the massive lying that the media and government and schools and hollywood have been doing for so long.
The potential voter pool has been polarized to an insane degree.
The courts MIGHT be able to find a pool of ignorant people who managed to completely isolated.
BUT, do we really expect them to be even trying for that?
OR, will the goal be to find a jury of people that, at first glance, look like they might be ok, because of shit like "not voting",
but in reality are biased against Trump and willing to follow the lefty narrative regardless of the Truth or the Law?
Except, that is not all I do. You just left a very important point out.
I also, give massive examples to support my assertion, such as the joint cia-fbi cover up during the election to control the outcome of the election. Which succeeded.
ALL of the lefties in this thread, and the other similar one have refused to even try to address my point.
Almost to a man, they have constantly tried to pivot away from my point back to the laptop and more accurately their SPIN of the laptop itself, when my point was about the behavior of the dems/lefties in the cia and the fbi.
Because they know that they cannot defend the actions of their fellow lefties, and that my point is true.
I can give massive examples to support my assertions as to why we can't trust conservatives. You would stonewall and deny it. So I sm glad to cite my examples. Will you concede once I show them or you going to deny it?
Also you have given many claims which are empty. So you are also lying.
I haven't addressed your complaints about conservatives becasue they are off topic.
I'm kind of curious what you think you have that is of a level of some of the dem/lefties BIG LIES of the last few years...
the cia/fbi lap top cover up being the most recent huge one.
But it has nothing to do with this thread really. My point about the complete dishonesty of the modern left, and how we cannot trust anything they say or do, is...cleary true.
And you guys a validating it, with nearly every dishonest post you make.
Conservatives are deceitful as well. You have showcased that beautifully. In the end you can't trust either side. I don't align with a side like you..I can see corruption on either side where as you can only see it on one.
Your vote matters, In any state you vote for governor, county auditor, state legislators, initiatives, etc. You talk as though you have never set eyes on an actual ballot.
I don't think any potential juror is going to be asked if they voted.
The court wants people without preconceived notions of Trump's innocence or guilt.
I think there is more likely to be former MAGA's who feel betrayed by Trump's callous attitude towards the J6 rioters who needed his help and those gun owners that he screwed over.
I've been in several jury pools. It is easy to hide your feelings on the law or the defendant if you want to. I never tried to hide my feelings while questioned.
Bitter and alone (you) is no way to go through life. That's assuming that you are not being paid ten cents per post for this drivel that you dream up. Fast food in California is paying 20 dollars per hour so now is your chance to move up in the world.
I see that logic eludes you. Not all Trump supporters are MAGA people. That aside some people can see that this trial is a farce. Enjoy your delusions while they last. By the way McDonalds does accept online applications so you can take care of that in between your trolling efforts. At 20 dollars per hour you will forget about this place and be able to afford toilet paper which I would guess is the source of your crustiness.
I don't think they have said whether the excused jurors were biased for or against Trump. Although, it is certain that pro-Trump people would be unlikely to be truthful in how they answer questions.
Why do all of the 34 charges have to be proven? Is 33 enough? One?
I think the term you are looking for is actually called "beyond a reasonable doubt". I don't think any jury instructions ever included "prove without a shadow of a doubt". You have never served on a jury, have you.
This is all so fascinating to me because I can't help but draw parallels between this real life situation and one of my all time favorite movies, which I rewatched for the umpteenth time just recently. I love it because it's a story of true justice! https://moviechat.org/tt0313542/Runaway-Jury